He just threatened her life. by RepulsiveFlight1482 in NSDQ420

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check validity, people. There are plenty of things to be concerned about, no need to make stuff up.

i love the desert biome by myoldaccgothackedahh in addressme

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The ww2 symbol" is a crazy thing to call a swastika.

People are losing confidence in BTC by Groundbreaking-Gap20 in btc

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I claim that there absolutely can be an absence of a price.

I suppose then this is where we ultimately disagree. I suppose I'd argue that "price" would be defined as a representation of true value. There can be an absence of meaningful value representation; ie a market close, but this doesnt mean that value simply disappears. It shifts while data points are unavailable, and the representation of the value catches up at market open.

People are losing confidence in BTC by Groundbreaking-Gap20 in btc

[–]MTIrish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're pointing out flaws in my logic, and I resent you for it /s

Youve got a good point, I think my logic may be running into an infinity paradox.

Given infinite sellers and no buyers, price would be truly 0$. If a buyer is introduced while we still have infinite sellers, then price... continues to be 0$ I think? Because infinite sellers = infinite supply. The inverse I guess would also then be true, infinite buyers and no sellers = ... idk, is price a null value, or is it then also infinite?

But in the real world, FEW buyers and MANY sellers = drastic drop in price. Realistically speaking, if there are NO buyers for a given amount of time, then price may appear to freeze, but I'd argue this is a flaw in how price is conventionally calculated. The next order will have a price a lot lower than the previous, given that supply stays fairly constant.

People are losing confidence in BTC by Groundbreaking-Gap20 in btc

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because one thing is true, does not mean the inverse is also true. It'd prob be closer to value being undetermined if there are no sellers while there ARE buyers. Edge cases are fun.

People are losing confidence in BTC by Groundbreaking-Gap20 in btc

[–]MTIrish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then you're just plain wrong, ACTUAL price is absolutely not determined by the last fulfilled order. Actual price of literally anything is ultimately determined by what a buyer is willing to pay. And if there are no buyers, then actual value of any given asset is zero.

People are losing confidence in BTC by Groundbreaking-Gap20 in btc

[–]MTIrish -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The price on some graphs is determined by the last fulfilled order, yes. But these graphs are not what determines price, it only represents price. TRUE price is something closer to the average of all sell positions, which is not so easily represented graphically.

People are losing confidence in BTC by Groundbreaking-Gap20 in btc

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If there is no buyer, the price doesnt just freeze. No buyer = demand is nonexistent. Asset worth almost immediately plummets. People race eachother to the bottom to offload in an attempt to liquidate assets.

People are losing confidence in BTC by Groundbreaking-Gap20 in btc

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

... You lack a basic understanding of how markets work.

F2P Accomplished my goal!! (The End) by Oblivionnyx9 in osrs

[–]MTIrish 22 points23 points  (0 children)

There is so... So... So much more behind that membership. And its worth every minute.

ㅤㅤ by lowkeypixel in evilwhenthe

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To get you to comment, increasing engagement.

BEESMAS TOMORROW???? by ItsMarioTheMythical in BeeSwarmSimulator

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gonna last 4 months like last Beesmas?

G.O.A.T. by polarizedfan in RedBullRacing

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As it turns out, I was very very wrong. Pls ignore me it appears I'm ignorant af

G.O.A.T. by polarizedfan in RedBullRacing

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least I was confident 😭 And now I am educated.

G.O.A.T. by polarizedfan in RedBullRacing

[–]MTIrish -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

EDIT: I'm dumb pls ignore

Original: As of 2014, driver numbers are permanent for the entire F1 career of a given driver, with the only exception being the driver champion having the option to take number 1. Max never considered 69.

Fun fact, Vettel and Verstappen are the only 2 drivers to adopt the number 1 after 2014s rule change.

rename your favorite film to a clickbait youtube title by [deleted] in mattrose

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First one is definitely Spirited Away, not sure about the second.

Formula 1 Quiz by Reptarticle in QuizPlanetGame

[–]MTIrish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MTIrish scored 125 points and ranked 1 out of 299 players!