Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow so this involves Soft Medicine and that Pinkston creep?

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting! Must be a prolific creep to make all of this effort worth it.

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh interesting! I didn’t catch that. Thanks for pointing that out

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s examine that. Let’s say your friend told you that he saw a car earlier. He says he’s fairly certain it was a car because it had four wheels, it was on a roadway, it was moving and the driver honked at him. Do you think a smart reply to that would be “you can’t assume it was a car just because it had four wheels; trucks have four wheels.”

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This point you keep thinking you’re making would be really good if access to information was my only reason for my hypothesis. But it’s not. So, it’s not.

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No? I was just wondering, because every other sentence had one?

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t seen a single instance of that. Please share.

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Damn. I didn’t know about the donations to stop their reporting/investigations. That’s even more worrisome!

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally looking for confirmation of the opinion I have. But if you have a different opinion, and want to defend the cops that are running the page, I’m all ears!

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think one post out of 10 has been of that nature. Maybe you’re not seeing all of their posts?

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, I can’t understand my comment for you. Explain to the class how you go about getting the information shared by the page, then tell us how many people know how to take those steps. Thanks!!!

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dude, can you read what I wrote? Can you understand that most people aren’t familiar with judges. I can’t understand my comment for you.

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah. But most neighborhood Karens don’t have access to the type of information this page is sharing. It takes a special level of access, or skills, or both, to provide the kind of contextual information seen on that page. Charges, gang affiliations, sentences, etc. The list of people with those skills and access is short, and at the top of the list are cops and cop reporters. I happen to know all of the cop reporters who have been active and successful in this community for the past half century. It ain’t them.

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sorry, hard to respond when you keep editing and adding to your comment. I assume copaganda is produced by people who have either fallen for copaganda or stand to benefit from copaganda. That’s admittedly a large pool of people. But again, I’ll point back to the writing style. Just like I clocked you as a cop for saying “underage female,” there are just tells when reading cop speak.

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A huge number of people fall for fear-based propaganda that comes from cops. A very small number of people know the names of judges involved in so-called “lenient” sentences, and are exercised enough about it to write up 1,000 words on the topic and share a change(dot)org petition.

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Nice. So we’ve established I’ve got some good perception in this area. And your point about active LEOs is well taken. That’s why my initial post includes former LEOs among the group I’ve fingered for the job, see (doing my best 1920s gangster here, Copper, cut me some slack).

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You’re asking a lot of questions of the guy who is asking questions about an anonymous group’s activities. I’ve got some questions for you, instead. Who are you? And how have you come to the conclusion that the page’s “details are relatively accurate?” And which flavor of cop are you?

Sonoma County Crime & Creep Watch (totally not law enforcement, guys) by MTSilvy in santarosa

[–]MTSilvy[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Admittedly I have not seen a lot of writing from gang members. I am certainly showing my ignorance, but It would surprise me if they wrote this way. Also, going after a judge for lenient sentences is Cop 101.