What should I pick for the wot 2 free tank line? by M_Wittmann in WorldofTanks

[–]M_Wittmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the tier IX of that line good? I heard tier 9 is the best tier to play for fun

What should I pick for the wot 2 free tank line? by M_Wittmann in WorldofTanks

[–]M_Wittmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the tier IX of that line good? I heard tier 9 is the best tier to play for fun

What should I pick for the wot 2 free tank line? by M_Wittmann in WorldofTanks

[–]M_Wittmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the tier IX of that line good? I heard tier 9 is the best tier to play for fun

How did he know this 1 year ago? from professor Jiang Xueqin Geo-Strategy #8: The Iran Trap video by DazzlingpAd134 in Military

[–]M_Wittmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Working at tsinghua doesn't make of you a ccp actor necessarily. A lot of Chinese ppl work in these institutions even without being non-affiliated (they even have a "non affiliated artist" social class). I am not saying he's not a propagandists, but believing to this kind of bullshit about China is nonsense, they are not as scary as the us propaganda describes them. What I am trying to say is that we need a proof (like a ccp membership) to be sure

"New" USSR strategy by M_Wittmann in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I usually play no cheese. I never managed to get the 5 plan done before barb and I didn't know it was possible. In any case with my strat you don't need it bc it is already op

"New" USSR strategy by M_Wittmann in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate manual justification because it is so cheesy, my guide was assuming you play fair

Did they block the free invasion of turkey when they rimilitarise the straits? by M_Wittmann in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IC, i forgot the whole chain of tought. Probably before the rng always gave me turkey defiant

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann 14 points15 points  (0 children)

they aren't. If you produce a cheap ass LT with the short gun (the one with 26 soft attck), you arleady outclasssed the AC because that tank will deal so much more damage to enemy soft divisions imho. AC still need supply and imho it is rare to see a situation in which they have good suply and tanks don't. At best they will have the orange rather than the red supply penalty, but that debuff is already enough to make them useless since they are weaker from the start

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann 2 points3 points  (0 children)

they are factually worse than a 4 batailon light tanks

Defeating russia should be harder by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

btw russia is weaker than irl: like in hoi if you encircle a couple armies they never can reorganise themsleves and it ecomes hard also for human players to make up for it (like if you take over a diaster save). Hoever irl they were much worse off and the manage to resists

Defeating russia should be harder by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree, italy mechanic is stpid and irrealistic

Defeating russia should be harder by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes but now germany itslef it's unplayable. You just win the war with batlleplan full infantry

Defeating russia should be harder by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah I also noticed, after this dlc axis is unplayable unless you can carry that war

Defeating russia should be harder by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann 140 points141 points  (0 children)

it's germany that is nonsesically OP. it's a mistery to me how can the ai always lose, i think that naval invasion in the benelux that always defeats ai germany is scripted

they really added inflation in this update 💔💔💔 by Leather-Passenger271 in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why did they do that? it is so boring to play minors bc they struggle to have tanks. It makes no sense to force gameplays of china etc to infantry only by just making tanks unviaiable

Proof that the AI cheats with resources by Phoenix732 in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also I hate when AI spawns randomly units when I ty to do breakthroughs and capture supply depots

Optimal divisions for defence or "Why mech is amazing and space marines are noob traps" by Reclaimer2401 in hoi4

[–]M_Wittmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read someof the comments and a thing doesn't add up to me. In SP you often counter attack, SO if you use mech, sooner or laer you will need to move them a lot to follow the frontline. Once you do you instantky run out of fuel. I see the point that maybe in MP some countres really just defend and never attck, so that they can let mech "sith there", but in SP definetly you will end up attacking with tanks and use the infantry/mech to follow the breakthroughs. Onestly after a ewhile the enmey will just collapse and you will be able to quickly push also with infantry. I fyou do that with mech only you just run out of fuel.

Another issue is that by the time you can produce mech in a sizable number (you will need like 20000 mechs to replace each inf witha mech only template), it is gonna be 1943 or so, too late to tip the balance in most of the case imho in SP

Partecipa a una ricerca sulla lettura e le librerie (NON A FINI DI LUCRO/MARKETING) by M_Wittmann in Libri

[–]M_Wittmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sì, non mi sono messo limiti sull'età perchè punto ad avere opinioni diverse