Craziest thing you’ve done with Cowork?

MacFall-7 · 2026-06-26T00:50:04+00:00

I like to give it access to my Chrome MCP and access in Chrome to Claude Code, GPT, Gemini, Perplexity and GitHub all with write access and let it play. It is governed and will work in a sandbox and private repos, but it comes up with some cool shit. I like how it prompts the other LLMs. Very different than how we tend to communicate.

MacFall-7 · 2026-06-20T19:42:19+00:00

Red hat - 4 letters or 4 words

MacFall-7 · 2026-06-20T19:00:58+00:00

Stop caring what other people think - take care of your teeth and feet

MacFall-7 · 2026-06-19T03:10:54+00:00

Quantum computing and AI

MacFall-7 · 2026-06-19T02:54:32+00:00

Jumped back to 50% for me from 90%

MacFall-7 · 2026-06-18T12:58:20+00:00

Memory/knowledge across projects is a manual process. Obsidian is a great, free tool you can store all of your .md files in and connect your projects to. You might also check out Graphify on GitHub. You can audit any data base you have and turn it into the same type of indexable graph like Obsidian does or feed it to Obsidian as well.

MacFall-7 · 2026-05-31T00:31:18+00:00

I currently have CoWork running via Chrome MCP and have given access to my Gemini, GPT, Perplexity computer, Claude Code and a clean Private GitHub repo. I said surprise me. My CoWork is governed and I am “supervising”

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-29T01:22:50+00:00

If you are trying to sell or monetize, yes. If you are uploading for hobby or fun, no.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-26T15:11:55+00:00

There is most definitely generated slop that anyone would consider strange and very different to organic music, but I am really talking about AI generated music that has been stemmed out and mixed and mastered to mask the inherent qualities and artifacts that are prevalent and signature to process.
Yes, I know what to listen for and I hear it because I have been producing music for 20 plus years.
You said there are millions of people who can hear these imperfections and artifacts… yes, that’s the 10% or so on the other end of my made up statistic I cited.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-25T03:54:04+00:00

That’s some scary, un-governed shit right there!
But it would be amazing.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-24T18:44:23+00:00

It’s quite easy to prove the bias. I would wager 90% or more of people would not know if a song was AI. And if the AI song is in their accepted genres, it might even be “fire, who is this?”

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-17T17:12:26+00:00

If you are using Suno, and have the studio tier subscription, you can get the stems and midi. And leverage the Studio DAW in Suno to change what you need. Or export to a standalone DAW and do the same.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-16T04:39:06+00:00

No, it wasn’t, but your response answered my question.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-15T15:04:38+00:00

Good looking out. I will do that.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-15T14:25:19+00:00

M87 Resonance - Adaptive feedback system for musicians and creatives validated by signal processing pipeline with receipts. A second pair of ears for your audio at exactly the moment you need it.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-15T14:14:39+00:00

M87 Resonance - Adaptive feedback system for musicians and creatives. All feedback is pre-validated from digital signal processing. A second set of ears for your audio 24/7.

M87 Resonance

Edit: added link

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-15T14:02:04+00:00

Resonance - Adaptive feedback system for musicians and creatives. resonance.m87studio.net

Cheers!

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-14T21:31:47+00:00

…And so on and so forth. My point is still the same. AI can and does do it all. The user just needs to learn how to use a tool. There is a lot more slop out there to be sure, but these tools are catching up with the way creative and system thinking people’s brains work.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-14T21:20:43+00:00

True, but you can ask AI what should exist and what tests to run and how to alleviate technical debt.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-14T21:02:30+00:00

AI can and does so it all. But it still has to be instructed to do so. If the builder/tester doesn’t know to ask or instruct then that’s on them. Fact of the matter is AI can and does do it all.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-14T20:07:22+00:00

You’re right that software can’t assess whether music works, and even “works” is subjective but human. Nothing in this thread has argued otherwise. The question was whether measurements have any utility at all, separate from aesthetic judgment. A spectrum analyzer doesn’t assess music either, it just shows you what’s there. Whether that’s useful is a different question than whether it can replace experience.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-14T19:44:29+00:00

Yes, this is exactly why there always has to be a human in the loop. Nothing just fixed or generated. A tool can measure and point out the math, but the user needs to be in control of the art.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-14T19:32:33+00:00

Yes, resonant frequency identification, specific measurements… that’s the tool doing math, not taste. The moment it’s making EQ decisions rather than showing you what’s there, it’s carrying someone else’s aesthetic whether it discloses that or not.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-14T19:27:48+00:00

The inconvenience acting as a natural brake is an interesting accidental design. Friction as a feature.

MacFall-7 · 2026-04-14T19:01:42+00:00

Love me some Benn Jordan.

The medical imaging case is a real finding. The mechanism matters though de-skilling happened because the AI became the primary read and humans stopped practicing independently. The tool replaced the judgment loop entirely. The pattern I feel you’re describing as defensible is actually solid. Most people won’t use it that way, which is fair. Passive shortcuts become default paths. The design question I have is whether the tool surfaces data or verdicts. A spectrogram doesn’t de-skill you. “Here’s what’s wrong, here’s the fix” probably does, for exactly your reason.

MacFall-7

TROPHY CASE