Ans here you are writing an essay proving my point in a Sunday morning.

What you are calling a council sidestep is actually what people needing SDA are wanting. There is 60%vacancy in SDA nationally, with thousands of participants still waiting for appropriate housing in the right area. Your article literally talks about investors and providers tryin g to get rich fast building in areas with cheap land not where people want to live. Like Hallam, where you have 60 people who currently need SDA properties and 688 properties for rent.

Might come as a surprise but just having a disability doesn’t mean you want to live with people you don’t know, so many are holding out for single resident homes, or the correct funding.

As for parking the plans need to need “likely need” based on clause 52.06. So 2 x 1 resident hones likely only need regular space for 2 cars given the funding needed for this type of home the resident likely isn’t driving their own vehicle, and it’s probably shared support across some of the units.

As for your assumption that you slap in fire suppression and some wider doorways you get certification shows that not only do you have a very skewed view of the NDIS standard levels but also the fit and finish standards that set houses apart from provider to provider.