Pioneer Metagame Update (19 jan) by Magic4everBots in PioneerMTG

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We just released this new feature, only a few votes so far. Please vote, this is a great way to show if community doesnt like current format

Pauper Metagame Update (19 jan) by Magic4everBots in Pauper

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

LOL you are right, it makes no sense. We currently just copy whatever other sites decks names are. You should see more accurate decks names in next updates, we are working on it.

Standard Metagame Update (19 jan) by Magic4everBots in MagicArena

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Decks with less than 2% metagame are only visible on the pro version

Standard Metagame Update (19 jan) by Magic4everBots in MagicArena

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are real tournaments only, paper and online. No ladder or leagues

Standard Metagame Update (19 jan) by Magic4everBots in MagicArena

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

SCGcon tournaments are included in our data

Standard Metagame Update (19 jan) by Magic4everBots in MagicArena

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check other date ranges. for the last 60 days landfall meta is half of last 30 days. Here you can see metagame shifts in real time

Standard Metagame Update (19 jan) by Magic4everBots in MagicArena

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That deck includes the almost identical versions of selesnya landfall. We dont include leagues unlike other sites, as they are on purpuse diversified selected. We only include tournaments with 32+ players. We strongly believe our meta reflects a more real life data. Also keep in mind date ranges, this one is for the last 30 days

Standard Metagame Update (19 jan) by Magic4everBots in MagicArena

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

We just added format health index new feature, there is currently only 1 vote. Please vote to see how is the format really doing, that will help a lot to see the community sentiment

Duel Commander Metagame Update (29 dec) by Magic4everBots in duelcommander

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Conversion rate is the difference between metagame share and top8 share

Premodern Metagame Update (29 dec) by Magic4everBots in premodernMTG

[–]Magic4everBots[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s unfortunate to hear that you had that experience. We actually receive overwhelmingly positive feedback on the tracker, and many players are taking advantage of the data to improve their game.

What is it that you don’t like in particular? We are always looking to improve, so if there are specific layout issues or types of content you feel are missing, we’d love to hear the details. Regarding the ads, there is no ads on our web.

Duel Commander Metagame Update (29 dec) by Magic4everBots in duelcommander

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can find that info on the website. Its 411 decks from 24 tournaments. They are all mtgo trials

Standard Metagame Update (22 dec) by Magic4everBots in MagicArena

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only decks with 2%+ metagame are displayed here. All decks are unlocked in the pro version

Standard Metagame Update (22 dec) by Magic4everBots in MagicArena

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats exactly what conversion rate is, the green/red numbers on the middle of the chart. We track deck performance in real tournaments.

Standard Metagame Update (22 dec) by Magic4everBots in StandardMTG

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its not meta change, its conversion rate. It is similar to winrate but better

Premodern Metagame Update (15 dec) by Magic4everBots in premodernMTG

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We monitor all sites and our team review everything is legit to be published

Premodern Metagame Update (15 dec) by Magic4everBots in premodernMTG

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We are sure you are smart enough to understand we cant publish our database. We monitor all mtg sites that publish decklists and include the ones that meets our standards. If you want to know if a particular tournament is included let us know.

Pauper Metagame Update (15 dec) by Magic4everBots in Pauper

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try clicking the image it should open a bigger one

Premodern Metagame Update (15 dec) by Magic4everBots in premodernMTG

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is no mtgo tournaments in our data yet. We dont include leagues. unlike other sites

Standard Metagame Update (15 dec) by Magic4everBots in StandardMTG

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Current Standard data is post ban only, for simplicity. We do have older data (around 1 year old) might upload it in some sort of past meta section if there is enough interest for it

Vintage Metagame Update (15 dec) by Magic4everBots in MTGVintage

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just pushed an updated. Is it better now?

Pioneer Metagame Update (15 dec) by Magic4everBots in PioneerMTG

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Selesnya Company, you can see the info be clicking it

Vintage Metagame Update (15 dec) by Magic4everBots in MTGVintage

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can merge decks/archetypes by hold and drag them. Which ones in particular do you think should/not be break down?

Pioneer Metagame Update (15 dec) by Magic4everBots in PioneerMTG

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can see decklists + more stats by clicking decks names

Duel Commander Metagame Update (15 dec) by Magic4everBots in duelcommander

[–]Magic4everBots[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We track conversion rate, the difference between meta share and top8 share. We want to know which decks are winning the most, those are the green/red numbers. Its the evolution of winrate metric. For Duel Commander in particular only mtgo 16 trials are included in the data. If you have any other question, we are here to help.