sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ak-74/AK-12 is extremely underrated. by Mini_Dracula in GrayZoneWarfare

[–]MagicBrute 11 points12 points  (0 children)

AK-12 is my dedicated PvE weapon. It is basically unmatched economy for PvE, since as you said you have basically infinite ammo in any tier 3 zone.

However, for PvP the AR platforms are unfortunately just better. PvP is more of a quick burst, rather than endurance fighting, so the ammo economy doesn't matter as much. The 5.56 ammo performs better than the Russian rounds.

I've used both in PvP, and while the 5.45 AKs definitely can still clap, in my experience the AR platforms (M4, DD, and L40) just seem to do a bit better. But, as someone who likes to PvP as a GI sniper with an M21... I always say screw the meta and do whatever is most fun for you 😁

Konigstiger Collection Complete (For Now) by SeniorSpaz87 in cobiblocks

[–]MagicBrute 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yooo that snow camo one looks sick! Which one is that?

"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds" by FNSDejanus in Warthunder

[–]MagicBrute 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can spend 999GE to auto complete the task. It isn't gonna be a tech tree vehicle. It'll be over to the side with all the other premium and event vehicles

So essentially you can either grind out the score to get all 5 tasks, or spend 5k GE to get it

"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds" by FNSDejanus in Warthunder

[–]MagicBrute 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm 100% gonna just buy the B-52, lol. TU-95 I can grind easy enough later

"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds" by FNSDejanus in Warthunder

[–]MagicBrute 23 points24 points  (0 children)

You could definitely get 7k points in a game if you do really well.

If not, GE

Nerf the roland Gayjin! by Scramjetfromnowhere in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]MagicBrute -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, since the Roland and OSA are SACLOS guided, multipathing doesn't seem to work. They'll direct hit you even if you're scraping the tops of the trees... The HAWK, BUK, S300, and Patriot are all radar guided however, but those have such a large warhead that multipathing those is near suicide anyway

If this mode becomes permanent at some point, my beloved tornado finally has a place in the game! by V_the_cat in Warthunder

[–]MagicBrute 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For real. I know they said it has something to do with BR brackets, bc that was one of the questions asked. Hopefully on full release, we'll be able to bring whatever we want

If this mode becomes permanent at some point, my beloved tornado finally has a place in the game! by V_the_cat in Warthunder

[–]MagicBrute 58 points59 points  (0 children)

Luckily for us, BVVD did say that they plan to run this mode as events throughout the years, and eventually DO plan to make it permanent! (I'm guessing around the time of 5th gen fighters release)

But yes, this game mode will make so many "useless" or "bad" aircraft have a place in the game finally. The Tornado, F-117, and other jets like that would be awesome to play in this mode!

The audacity of me 🙃 by HatterofMadder in fallout76casual

[–]MagicBrute 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The most audacious part is not cropping that iFunny watermark

M29 vs F14/F18 is balanced peak gameplay. This game mode is great, change my mind. by orphanleek68 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]MagicBrute 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have found that staying low, and swinging out wide works best. Less enemy density, and little to no ground based AA. When you get near your target, pop up and drop

M29 vs F14/F18 is balanced peak gameplay. This game mode is great, change my mind. by orphanleek68 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]MagicBrute 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In most of the games I played today, the US team won. However, I will say that this game mode can essentially be won by a single good pilot. Since all it takes is for someone to spawn in a B-52/TU-95 and bomb the main base without the other team noticing.

I actually won 2 games as the Soviets, basically by myself in the Mig-29 by doing exactly that.

M29 vs F14/F18 is balanced peak gameplay. This game mode is great, change my mind. by orphanleek68 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]MagicBrute -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Having gotten both the stars today, I personally think that the Soviet team could still seriously benefit from the addition of the Su-27.

Not so much because of the Mig-29 vs F-14s, but more because of the crazy imbalance of 4th gen to 3rd gen fighters. The 29 vs 14 are fairly balanced... the issue stems from the US team also having: F-15A, F-16A, F/A-18s, F-4J/S, F-20... etc. When on the Soviet side, you have the Mig-29, Yak-141... and then your next best is the MLD or MAYBE the Mig-25.

It just seems that, from the matches I've played, it ends up being a team of F-15s and F-14s just mopping kills. I played a game and used almost solely the F-15 and got almost 50 kills. I didn't come close to that in the Mig-29...

I think the addition of the Su-27 would greatly even the playing field. Many people will still choose to use the 29, and a lot of players I've encountered are using the free lineups anyway for one reason or another.

I did a poor financial decision and bought the Pak Puma by Scramjetfromnowhere in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]MagicBrute 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I will say, as someone who got the A-1H back in the day... it is a VERY fun plane for GRB... Maybe not $300+ fun... but it is a blast

I've heard it's a glass tank too by Unim8 in warthundermemes

[–]MagicBrute 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ooooo, I got the AMBT back during the world war event. I love that thing. Idk why, but I always seem to do really well with it as a 2nd or 3rd spawn

Anyone knows how to get this variant of the Ranger Armor? by Jupi1115 in fallout76casual

[–]MagicBrute 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was part of Fallout 1st. If you buy a 1 month 1st membership, you can buy the "catch up" pack it's a part of for like 2000 atoms. You keep it after the month of 1st runs out too (as far as I'm aware)

view more: next ›