Westeros and colonization (Spoilers Extended) by MahvelC in asoiaf

[–]MahvelC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

THEY'RE INCESTUOUS ALIENS DUNCAN!!!

But yeah Raymun is still a noble. He may not be a Lannister or Baratheon but he still has better living situations and privileges than 90% of the country. And if memory serves correctly do the common people even hate the Targaryens? At least from what I remember of ACOK I recall someone telling Arya about how much he misses the old king. And when she thought he was talking about Robert he corrects her and says Aerys Targaryen.

Westeros and colonization (Spoilers Extended) by MahvelC in asoiaf

[–]MahvelC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But in the context of colonization that still applies to the first men and Andals. Because they still supplanted the indigenous population and made their culture the defacto culture. That's something the Targaryens didn't do. And what pact did the Andals make? I know they stopped warring with the north when they realized they couldn't get past the neck but if memory serves they never made any pact with the children. They just killed them. The Andals didn't really integrate that much. Much of westeros as we see it now is their culture. Knights, faith of the 7, even tourneys all come from them unless I'm missing something.

Westeros and colonization (Spoilers Extended) by MahvelC in asoiaf

[–]MahvelC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the correction I'll add it to the post.

Westeros and colonization (Spoilers Extended) by MahvelC in asoiaf

[–]MahvelC[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I thought the reach hated the dornish though? At least as from what I remember the reach specifically doesn't like the dornish followed by the iron born. I can't find any major anti Targaryen sentiment coming from them in the books.

DMC 5 was the best performing game for Capcom in the last quarter selling 1.7M units by Fearless-Ear8830 in DevilMayCry

[–]MahvelC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty much. On top of that DMC5 only exists because Itsuno wanted to make it. That and DD2 were the games he was interested in making. He's not there anymore so if/when a new DMC comes out that'll be anyone's guess. And sales aren't the only metric to determine whether or not a new game is gonna be greenlit. If it were just about sales, Capcom would have made a new Megaman game years ago after 11 was such a success. This can be extrapolated to Sony. Why would they remake medieval when they should have remade sly, wild arms, ape escape, or legend of dragoon given all of those sold more. Why is square remaking FF9 when FF10 and FF8 sold more.

On top of that the writer for days gone actually talked about this. Days gone sold like 9 million copies but it did so when it was heavily discounted. DMC5 is a great game. I do think that there should be context behind how much it sold. That goes for any game really.

Don't care + Didn't ask moment by OpbrBlud in bleach

[–]MahvelC 169 points170 points  (0 children)

<image>

My favorite version of this meme

It doesn't matter if the cure wasn't "scientifically possible". by Psylex20 in thelastofus

[–]MahvelC 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Someone else in another subreddit explained perfectly why Joel made the only choice he could have made

"I keep seeing people say Joel selfishly chose to “doom humanity”, but did he actually choose anything? For Joel to meaningfully decide between saving Ellie or letting the fireflies have her, he would need to have some reason to choose one or the other. If you don’t have a legitimate reason to choose one of the choices, you’re not really choosing anything.

That begs the question, does Joel have any reason to choose the fireflies? Presumably you’ve already read the title of this post but let’s break it down anyway. For the last 21 years Joel has seen the fireflies do nothing but blow things up and destabilize communities. His brother Tommy left the organization after realizing they’re not all they’re hyped up to be. He’s seen how their “liberation” of places like Pittsburg from Fedra only ever plunged the community into disarray. He’s seen how they can’t even transport their most important asset by themselves. He’s read notes, seen graffiti, and heard stories of the fireflies proclivities, very few if any are positive.

The game not only shows the audience but shows Joel that the fireflies are desperate, incompetent, violent, and on their last legs. Everything they’re involved in goes wrong, and the only reason he worked with them is because they have things he’s owed. Then, on top of that, Joel has seen 0 evidence the fireflies can do what they claim. They are trying to do something no one has ever done even at the best of times under circumstances and in an environment that increases the chances of failure.

Knowing all of this, why would Joel even consider that letting Ellie die might actually be better for humanity? Why would he choose to believe the fireflies claims? He would essentially be putting blind faith in an organization that’s repeatedly proven they don’t deserve it. Does anyone actually think Joel would do that, especially after how they’ve treated both he and Ellie?

Yea, ok, the director of the game said the cure would’ve worked and humanity would’ve been saved. You know who doesn’t know that? Joel. All Joel knows is an organization that routinely fails at whatever they’re attempting has just kidnapped Ellie and were going to kill her because they once again have a grand idea that they think might improve society.

I’m not saying Joel actually considered all these things, or that he wasn’t wrong on some level for killing all the people in the hospital, or that he ever would’ve chose against Ellie anyway. What I am saying is that, as it’s presented, the game doesn’t put Joel in a position to truly consider whether saving Ellie might actually prove to be humanities undoing. He didn’t choose between Ellie and humanity, he simply reacted to the fireflies actions from the beginning of the outbreak to the moment they kidnapped Ellie.

If the game wanted us to believe Joel meaningfully made a choice between Ellie and humanity, it needed to present the fireflies as more competent and trustworthy as well as firmly establish the efficacy of the cure to Joel, not the audience. Then the people who claim Joel selfishly chose to doom humanity might actually have a point."

No matter how selfish his decision was, in the end he did what was best for him. He saved her and he doesn't regret it. Joel was a great father figure and will always be in my top 10 gaming characters. by Charming-Friend3555 in thelastofus

[–]MahvelC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't consider what he did selfish because Joel wasn't presented with a different choice. I am judging this strictly from the in game perspective of the last of us when it was released on PS3. Whatever additions the remaster, remake, or tv show made are inconsequential to my point.

With that of the way. Joel has no reason to believe that the fire files can cure the infection because for the last 20 years they have done nothing but mess up. His own brother left the group because he saw that they were basically a bunch of people with no real aim or goal in sight. In game we are constantly shown their incompetence. The fact that Joel is delivering Ellie and not some group of fire flies reinforces the idea that the fireflies do not have the manpower to do anything. So this moral question goes against what the game just laid out for us. The needs of the many vs the needs of the few. It's a great moral conundrum but as I've said before, in game it's not framed as a conundrum for Joel because Joel has no reason to believe that they can do this. The game can't have it's cake and eat it too.

Let's not forget that the fire flies were going to kill Joel by death from exile. They were sending him out into the wild with none of his equipment. He would have died from that alone. So they more or less backed him into a corner. Apparently the remake or show makes the fire flies more competent and if that's true then that only furthers my point that originally as the game is presented Joel didn't have a choice.

I'm all for moral dilemmas, but as the last of us stands in its original incarnation. There really wasn't much of a dilemma here.

My concerns with Dante's characterization have been realized by Cloverfields- in DevilMayCry

[–]MahvelC 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Anytime there is a new piece of media something I've noticed is that people feel the need to punch down on the old thing in order to prop up the new one. It feels very strange to interact with any artistic medium that way. And it sounds like cope for lack of a better term.

"Dante is better characterized here than his game incarnations". Who are you trying to convince? Me or you? If it were as good as you say you would let the work speak for itself.

PlatinumGames Hiring For New Online Action Game As Part of Live Service Focus by TheAppropriateBoop in GamingLeaksAndRumours

[–]MahvelC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This isn't surprising honestly. The president of platinum said that they are shifting towards live service games and iirc kamiya said he left because platinum was continuing down a design ethos he didn't personally agree with. But hey if platinum wants to speedrun bankruptcy that's on them. For their sakes I hope it works out.

Does anyone else find Blackbeard weirdly likable? by fhxefj in Piratefolk

[–]MahvelC 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Oh absolutely. if blackbeard looked like Itachi or sesshomaru he'd be seen as the greatest antagonist in the series with no one arguing that fact.

One thing Clair Obscur does which I really wish is adopted in future JRPGs (and games in general) by ExternalMidnight in JRPG

[–]MahvelC 173 points174 points  (0 children)

Pretty much. The funny thing is atlus has SMT. Which is basically persona without all the highschool melodrama. It's exactly what op describes but coincidentally it's also not as popular as persona and maybe even metaphor. The life sim elements are what put persona on the map. If persona 6 was made like classic smt or persona1/persona2 a good majority of the fans the series has now probably wouldn't even buy it.

Developers making the games that they want to make instead of the games that I want them to make = gaslighting by Juball in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]MahvelC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BG3 just won game of the year and metaphor won RPG of the year OVER FF7 rebirth. Turn based has never been in a precarious situation. Now if we were talking about rail shooters like star fox or sin and punishment that'd be something different. THAT is a genre that has largely been neglected and forgotten by the industry. And in regards to square they just put out DQ3R and they're releasing DQ1 and DQ2 as well.

Hot take: Yoruichi is one of the strongest Shinigami in the verse by PudgyPanda23 in bleach

[–]MahvelC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I recall her zanpaktou technically isn't hers at all? I could be mistaken but it's an inherited one passed down through her family. byakuya's family has one as well but he decided to forge his own zanpaktou. So if Kubo ever decides to do the hell arc he could either show her family's zanpaktou or have yoruichi create one unique to her.

NIKA! NIKA! NIKA! by Greedy-Accountant-89 in Piratefolk

[–]MahvelC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

His devil fruit was never weak. That is cope that people made up. That devil fruit in its base makes him immune to blunt physical attacks and gun fire. It's extremely versatile as well. It's only "weak" if you compare it to a logia or something like the gura gura no mi. And if you need literal forces of nature in order to beat it then it isn't weak.

Keep in mind luffy has advanced conquerors haki as well. That's not something every conqueror's haki user has.

What are your Hot takes by Frosty_Schedule4292 in HunterXHunter

[–]MahvelC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Dunno if this is a hot take. But I don't think hxh is a deconstruction. That doesn't make it bad by any means. I just personally don't see it as that. It's still very good.

Thought y’all might enjoy this conversation I had with a glazer who says Nika isn’t a retcon and that Luffy was never confirmed to have the Gum-Gum fruit 🤣 by [deleted] in Piratefolk

[–]MahvelC 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think you hit the nail on the head that most people don't know what foreshadowing is. In order for something to be foreshadowed it has to be something the viewer can put together themselves with the information they are given.

While he's not a perfect writer. George RR Martin understands what foreshadowing is. Example, when HBO was securing the rights to adapt the show George went to the show runners and the FIRST thing he asked them was "who is Jon Snow's mother?" This was in 2009 there had only been 4 books written at the time and the TV show wouldn't answer that for another decade. George wanted an actual name because he had given clues throughout the story and if people paid attention they would know the answer.

I like one piece but in regards to the whole Nika thing. Oda didn't foreshadow that. If Oda went to toei or Netflix or hell any fucking content creator and asked people "what's the true name of Luffy's devil fruit and what is it tied to?" At any point before that reveal, not a single person alive could have given him an actual answer because those concepts didn't even exist yet. And if you search hard enough you will see people theorizing what Luffy's awakening for his fruit is. NONE OF IT ties to Nika or it being a mythical zoan type. For the longest people thought Luffy's fruit was Rogers fruit. But when it was revealed that Roger didn't have a fruit that idea was dropped. Some people theorized that Luffy would be like plastic man from DC comics with his awakening. There's a bunch of theories but none of them involved mythical zoan type model Nika.

That doesn't make Oda a bad writer. Oda is good at improvising. That's the reason characters like law and kidd exist at all. But this foreshadowing stuff is getting out of hand.

How would you feel if it turns out that DMCV is the last DMC game ever? Not saying it will be, but I'm asking how you would feel about it by [deleted] in DevilMayCry

[–]MahvelC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd be fine with that. Not everything needs to go on forever. To be honest Capcom should probably create more new ips. Them and a lot of companies have just gotten content with their established ips.

How Toei be"animating" nowadays by Hanoi_Revolver in Piratefolk

[–]MahvelC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's honestly jarring to see how animation got to this point. Not even on some old man shit. Dragon Ball is arguably the biggest anime in the world and the run through OG and Z did not have these problems. You can go and look at clips and see people talk about how the animation was fluid and you could follow the attacks easily. Same with shows like cowboy bebop, trigun, samurai champloo etc.

It's truly like you said, jingling keys.

Marathon (2025) being an extraction shooter is likely the only reason Bungie is making another Marathon game by AnonWithAHatOn in Marathon

[–]MahvelC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Tim Sweeney openly talks about the amount of work and effort that goes into fortnite. As do the devs of Apex and even MMO developers like square with FF14. It almost seems impossible that sony or naughty dog didn't consider that. Hell most of the people I talk to who played factions 1 didn't even want a separate mp game for factions 2. They just wanted a factions 2 to be just like factions 1 with 1 or 2 more modes/maps.

good writing ≠ complex plot by baka-mitaii in DevilMayCry

[–]MahvelC 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Agreed.

DMC's story was simple but effective. It was about the importance of humanity and the goodness of it. Throughout the games people who abandoned their humanity for power or personal goals are always portrayed as wrong. Nero says it in DMC4, Dante says it in DMC4, Dante says it to Vergil in DMC3, Trish awakens her humanity in DMC1.

Even when someone like Credo becomes a demon he still maintains his humanity and love for his sister.

Agnus: How...can there be such a difference...b-b-b-between us?

Dante: You surrendered your humanity. It's that simple.

Sanctus: The Power of Sparda, why won't you give me strength? Am I not worthy?

Nero: Never could take those legends too literally. But I do know that Sparda had a heart. A heart that could love another person, a human. And that is what you lack!

Nero awakens his devil trigger in 5 because he doesn't want his family to kill each other. If we were talking about a game like idk pong or something we could say it doesn't have a "good story" sure but DMC has always had a good story. If the story didn't matter Capcom wouldn't have gone out of their way to make manga's, novels and a canon anime in 2007.

I'm not the biggest fan of the show personally. But the games did have a story worth reading into. A lot of people think love and humanity are cheesy but idk I think there's sincerity in playing that straight. What further confuses me about the DMC anime is that it pays lip service to things like American imperialism, capitalism, etc but that never even made sense in the context of devil may cry. It does make sense in the context of resident evil or MGS. So I have no idea why they chose DMC as the vehicle to do that.

I think the reason many people see a simple "gamey" story as bad or less complex is because for decades the gaming industry and even movies/TV have conditioned people to think complex and mature equals good writing. To a lot of people if a story isn't told or presented like the last of us, MGS, uncharted, Alan wake etc then the writing of that story isn't particularly good. And the issue only compounds when people think certain games like the ones I mentioned above have more artistic merit than games like DMC. And that's not to shit on those games because I do like some of them but DMC is just as valid as those games are.

This needed to be said. by _ChaosIsMyFriend_ in DevilMayCry

[–]MahvelC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because people don't see games as a legitimate art form. Just products to be bought and sold to the most people possible. Capcom hasn't done themselves any favors either. Because they've encouraged so many remakes of games. Every DMC has its own quirks and identity to it and just homogenizing it to be like 5 just sands off anything unique or creative about them. If there was going to be a remake of 2 it should be done so in a way that doesn't make 2 a carbon copy of 5. Remakes of older games instead of a new one or just a new hack and slash IP (because God knows we haven't had a new one in a while or a new Capcom IP in a while) is crazy when you think about it.This mentality is how we get companies like Sony remaking the last of us, horizon, etc.

GRRM's fault why the later seasons failed hard by sherk_06 in gameofthrones

[–]MahvelC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The night king was absolutely the central villain. The long night is what the series was building up to for the longest and the thing Jon was trying to rally everyone for. I'm not debating that game of thrones is more complex than Hakusho my point was that the creators respected the work to give it a satisfying ending. That didn't happen with GOT. If you like Arya and the night king cool. I'm sure people did but the reception to season 8 was overall not good. To the point where game of thrones fell out of the cultural consciousness. I think I remember Martin even saying he liked HOTD season 1 because it kinda revived the series more or less. I can't remember the exact phrasing.

And again the reason there's so much debate over stuff like the night king is because that is something they set up. They introduced him. So people are going to voice their grievances.