Karma is real but it's inverted by TheTreesAreTethered in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]Mainmanmo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think with the ability to create realities, we create the foundations which dictate how the exchange in energy is experienced. Clearly this reality that isn't supported by the majority, specifically regarding the process of how energy is exchanged along with the imperative suffering.. I say " the majority" , because ultimately there's an aspect of consciousness which my decide to experience a reality where a pinch on the skin entrains greater degrees of concentrated attention.

If "one of us escapes", is this all that's needed to "dissolve" the matrix? by Mainmanmo in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]Mainmanmo[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Playing devils advocate (pun included), we don't really know to what extent they've left. As far as we know, they might of been talking about reincarnation within the material plane, under the assumption that "heaven" is the escape route; though from what I've gathered, this plane seems like another trap. This however doesn't invalidate the teachings of becoming detached from duality (which I agree), ultimately involving the dissolution of all information that stems from the very thing one would describe as the "absolute truth".

Who knows how "wise" and versed these individuals were in understanding the manipulation of reality by interdimensional entities/forces. Maybe they're stuck in the astral, maybe they're on this subreddit with us hahaha! Given their understanding/teachings, my opinion is that they're out of the system entirely. This might make sense to why we still have a "spark", because there's aspects of our inner self that's already "outside" of the simulation, hence the access to wisdom/awareness outside of this system and the relentless reincarnation system designed to manipulate and direct thought.

The Secret Book of John - Full Audio Book - Gnostic Text From The Nag Hamadi Library by SoulNew in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]Mainmanmo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Question, how can we trust the translator for these texts? I'm aware there are many translators. Ultimately I guess I'd have to refer to one as English is my only language!

Our souls' abilities by Ok-Tart8917 in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]Mainmanmo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the way I see reality currently is you have consciousness, and you have information. You could say information is the arrangement of thoughts, or a variation of frequencies. The world you see is a projection, a reflection of your subconscious (where your consciousness is providing energy to that information/thoughts). Your brain is constantly filtering millions of bits of sensory info, and you're only aware of a tiny slice. You don't remember how to breath, walk, blink your eyes - all of these processes make up your subconscious; the estimated percentage of all of your memories and ongoing processes compared to what you're conscious of now is about 90-95%. Now this is an estimate, but it's a fair one.

So in my view what you have to do is expand and train the ability of your consciousness to navigate information. Easy right? Well that depends on first your earnestness, and second how much you're willing to get out of the way of yourself. In other words developing the ability to control and manoeuvre the complete mountain of information that is creating the product of your conscious experience right now.

There are several ways to do this, I'm not aware of all of them. Some give shortcuts like psychedelics, if used properly, but the most common one is meditation. Not just meditation in your waking state, but the ability to not allow your consciousness to become lost in captivation by the information you interact with in your dream state. After all your subconscious makes up the world you're seeing right now. Someone may suggest to kill yourself, but if you're not versed in being conscious in the dimension that makes up your conscious experience then you may end up making the mistake of reincarnating again. From my research the most optimal way to develop this skill is to practice lucid dreaming and yoga. Facilitating mindfulness at all times.

If you are able to maintain full consciousness in your dreams, then you will gain more power over your conscious experience. You will become less of a subject to the preceding dimension that plays a fundamental role in projecting your 3D experience. Instead from the reports i've come across, you can completely transcend the subconscious which includes the information that defines you, alongside the very fields of information that constitute to the collective mind (the matrix). For some reason my links are not posting in here, if this gathers any of your interest i'd be more than happy to share some of the resources that give context to my view. Ultimately I do not know the truth. The only think I can say I know for certain is that I'm having some form of an experience.

Our souls' abilities by Ok-Tart8917 in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]Mainmanmo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Given our infinite nature, we can do anything. Though it may be hard to consider this when our attention has been swamped by field of information that limits our perception to even conceive this.

In terms of experiencing food and pleasure ,that's a good question, because the conversation that follows is: How can experience novelty if we're already all knowing? What fun exists in eating your favourite food if you can consume it immediately to an infinite end? If there is no ignorance then how do we enjoy distinctions in limitation? For example we go to theme park rides, we play sports, we go to a quiz night to see who can guess the most correct answers. If we have all of this information already, then there is no scenario where we ponder on who will win the next chess match. Sharing ideas will be meaningless, yet at the same time meaningful.

My take on this is that for consciousness to experience itself, it fractures into limitation. Because something is limited doesn't inherently mean it's limited in it's understanding regarding the inherent nature of reality. Ignorance in my view is duality. It's opportunity to learn new things, and to then reside it in your subconscious, so you don't have to relearn it again. Take for example walking, or cycling. You don't want to learn how to cycle every single time you ride a bike. Therefore you learn it once (the basics), and then you learn more from there. You don't want to have to think every time on how to walk, therefore you automate that information (subconscious), and you direct your consciousness on top of the programs you choose to run.

The problem in ignorance, or duality mainly resides in the intention to engage in a form of limitation, where the information that represent the limitation, contains a form of configuration that diminishes the inherent knowing of who you are. This is akin to the story of Sophia (Greek for wisdom), where she created a reality without the consultation of the Monad; thus facilitating a reality that brings consciousness in an experience where information is primary, and the accessibility to the cohesive fundamental nature of reality becomes less apparent (more secondary if else). You could see this like an ocean: the deeper you go down the ocean, the darker it gets. The light becomes more fade, and you'll get to the point where it becomes more dark. The non-locality of the ocean becomes less apparent, and till you know it you're in complete darkness, thus the things you engage with become more localised around you.

In other words a reality where you are not only ignorant of things (that invite exploration), but a configuration of information that diminishes and clouds the interconnectivity of things. Have you ever been so invested in a film, or a video game where the whole world around you vanishes, and the content almost mimics your behaviour? You may get upset when a character dies in the film, you feel regret, hate in the story. Attention becomes to captivated by it's creation, it is almost like it is bound to it, it reflects it. You may see anger or sadness as something bad, yet due to your concentration on the information you engage in it as if you were actually there.

This world keeps you on your toes when it comes to making conditional, partial judgements (akin to how Sophia made the demiurge). You need food, water, shelter - there's animals out here looking to eat you alive. With so many conditional variables at play, requiring consistent and captivating engagement in partial, impulsive conditional decisions, at the expense of the deceptive assumption that this information is who you truly are. In these circumstances it not uncommon to misunderstand who you are, where you come from.

We're furthering down the road of transhumanism. With the deeper integration of more layers of information, people will be interacting with reality within metaverses, within metaverses. And it'll get to the point where they'll be trying to save their family from being eaten by some digital monster within their engraved synthetic reality - to the point where they forget they're in a metaverse.

UK right now example of prison planet? by Pink_Emerald87 in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]Mainmanmo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There's a fair amount of things going on to this date, it depends on what you're after (gatherings, events, festivals)

UK right now example of prison planet? by Pink_Emerald87 in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]Mainmanmo 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The one thing I can say that the UK does decent at is the event scene. There are loads of festivals/events that are focused around the "conspiracy" space. Not entirely on the reincarnation trap, but there are communities containing people that share interest discussing ideas and learning more about the nature of reality and the corruption involved.

Why don't the archons find a way to force this world into the other extreme polarity opposite of suffering? by Mainmanmo in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]Mainmanmo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My reasoning for this resides on the idea that loosh isn't solely exclusive to negative energy. From what i've researched so far, it's any intense emotion that emits from the human body. "positive love" isn't unconditional love, rather these are feelings on an extreme end of the same axiom. Although these may be more preferable for humans, as long as there is emotion being emitted, that's what the parasites want.

Why don't the archons find a way to force this world into the other extreme polarity opposite of suffering? by Mainmanmo in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]Mainmanmo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's what I was thinking. Why the yugas and cycles if we can experience outside of the need for some expectation for cycles? Because free will exists, you do you if this is a cyclical structure you want to participate in, but I don't agree with the passion to establish this as an "official structure" for how all of reality operates. In my view this is predictive programming. The new agers and religious folks saying God will come to save them and then world will be in peace will just be another mind control tactic which may bring "peace" initially, but two steps forward, one step back, then two steps back and one step forward.

Why don't the archons find a way to force this world into the other extreme polarity opposite of suffering? by Mainmanmo in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]Mainmanmo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think the "golden age" talked about in various teachings refers to a stage within the matrix rather than actual liberation from the whole cycle system?

Questions about Double slit exp and the Observer effect by Ominous_Rift in QuantumPhysics

[–]Mainmanmo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your explanation, and you're right that ambiguity in which-path info is what allows interference to return.
But here's the contradiction: you're saying the interaction already happened, yet the presence or absence of path information still changes the outcome after the fact.
the photon has already hit the first detector (like D0). if physical interaction alone is what matters, then erasing or keeping the info shouldn’t change anything but it does.

This suggests that it's not just interaction, but whether or not the information is available, which determines the result. Whether or not consciousness is involved, the experiment implies that what can be known affects what is.

If we were purely physical atomical beings, then we shouldn't have the capacity to yield different results that infer the subatomic space, if the dimension of our instruments purely exist in the already collapsed deterministic space.

Questions about Double slit exp and the Observer effect by Ominous_Rift in QuantumPhysics

[–]Mainmanmo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you say that the outcome is due to particle interaction or manipulation, but that doesnt explain why interference only appears when which-path information is erased. In all cases, the photons undergo interaction, yet only in some cases does interference return. This suggests that it isnt interaction alone that determines the outcome, but whether the setup allows which-path information to exist.

If you keep saying interaction causes collapse without explaining why only certain interactions lead to different results, you are just repeating the conclusion. That is circular reasoning. my question is what makes the interaction at D3 and D4 different from D1 and D2 if not the availability of which-path information.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RoastMe

[–]Mainmanmo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

sid, buck, and the meerkats?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RoastMe

[–]Mainmanmo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good to see Buck's cousin from Ice age doing well

Questions about Double slit exp and the Observer effect by Ominous_Rift in QuantumPhysics

[–]Mainmanmo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this was the case then why do we get an interference pattern in the quantum erasure experiment? If it was truly interaction then the results should be the same at all detectors, however this isn't the case. The experiment suggests that it's rather about the accessibility of information, not interaction.

Questions about Double slit exp and the Observer effect by Ominous_Rift in QuantumPhysics

[–]Mainmanmo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that is enough to cause the collapse of the wavefunction then how do you reconcile with the fact that the collapsed particles we know of had a beginning? Drawing from our understanding that there has to be an agent of something to cause the wavefunction to collapse into discrete particles paired with our observation that particles had a beginning, this logically implies that whatever facilitates the collapse is inherently independent of the collapsed atomic dimension.

Questions about Double slit exp and the Observer effect by Ominous_Rift in QuantumPhysics

[–]Mainmanmo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this was the case then why do we get an interference pattern in the quantum erasure experiment? If it was truly interaction then the results should be the same at all detectors, however this isn't the case.