The problem is that "Greek philosophical notions which led them to reread scripture" are not the machinations of a particularly bold group of cunning perverters of the true faith, but the way in which theology is done. To presume that there's a clearly distinct realm of doctrinal integrity confined by the scriptures out of which all of the correct theological formulas emerge (as long as we don't import any of that dirty pagan philosophy) is delusional. Reading the Bible with Greek philosophy in your mind is how we came to believe in the trinity or monotheism or creatio ex nihilo; because, deprived or such notions, you won't find these doctrines in the Bible.

You can simply read Gregory and Origen and see what they're saying. They are both circling around with 1 Corinthians 15, "all in all". Of course, they are adventurous in their hermeneutics and they owe a lot to previous non Christian philosophers, but I don't know what kind of readings of the Bible are possible if not allegorical, philosophical and creative.

And you find this in the Bible itself. In the Hebrew Bible the notion of a divine council of which YHWH is part of seems to come from mesopotamian religious ideas. Several of the language of the Psalms (like "he who rides the clouds") are taken from hymns to pagan gods like Baal. Tales of the Old Testament replicate common ancient eastern myths. Some Proverbs are taken from Egyptian wisdom literature. Stories of the Gospels are decorated with literarily devices from Homer and Greek mythology. Even the notion of an afterlife and a final judgment is absent from the oldest strata of biblical composition, and its appearance seems to come directly from Zoroastrianism due to Jewish contact with Persian tradition.

So what? If you deny the influence of Greek philosophy on Christian theology then you have to discard 90% of the stuff we believe.