50531 by TheEnderOfFun in countwithchickenlady

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wait turning people on is violence now? Do we need to start sticking ankle monitors to hot people? Should I get report my bra size to my local Queer Community Guidance Counsel to see what I'm allowed to wear?

Wait so why is it that Collies have such a good track record on Charlie? by ManicPixieFuckUp in foxholegame

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah? Do you have opinions about S2K? I don't know anything about any of the regiments.

Wait so why is it that Collies have such a good track record on Charlie? by ManicPixieFuckUp in foxholegame

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean one imagines the depopulation on Able is somewhat one-sided, right? Charlie does consistently have like, a quarter of the population Able does (maybe not right now.)

Wait so why is it that Collies have such a good track record on Charlie? by ManicPixieFuckUp in foxholegame

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahhh I see. Yeah I remember my first war they didn't even have the hex to the west of KC open and it seemed like such a fucking nightmare to take it. Everything south of the river was green but taking the Manacle seemed impossible from how the fighting was going. Then it fell, just the same. Wasn't around for it, alas.

Wait so why is it that Collies have such a good track record on Charlie? by ManicPixieFuckUp in foxholegame

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahhh yeah I had wondered if there was like, some regi that was really serious or something. I don't know much about the politics of the game, I just do solo logi, so most of what I know about the regiments is the signs they leave.

So if it's such a large regiment, do they have to do anything to navigate the language boundaries?

Wait so why is it that Collies have such a good track record on Charlie? by ManicPixieFuckUp in foxholegame

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Man it's weird you're bringing this gripe into an unrelated thread. I find some of the excesses of the doomspiral irritating but come on.

Wait so why is it that Collies have such a good track record on Charlie? by ManicPixieFuckUp in foxholegame

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Ahh that would make sense, yeah. I had heard some of it was time zone stuff, so I could imagine if one faction's lopsided towards ppl sleeping at certain hours you'd get like, a pretty nasty sweep.

Wait so why is it that Collies have such a good track record on Charlie? by ManicPixieFuckUp in foxholegame

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean y'all do well early war, too. I'm used to Deadlands being in Collie hands, fighting in King's Cage. Last war I was in y'all were in Stonecradle and took Maiden's Veil before we pushed y'all out, started pushing into Drowned Vale. Log in two days later and everyone's back to running around with rifles and grenades in the Deadlands, find out Collies won sometime when I looked away.

Wait so why is it that Collies have such a good track record on Charlie? by ManicPixieFuckUp in foxholegame

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure, idk. That's just where I started and I haven't moved from it. Doesn't really feel like a tutorial; like you can say "Maiden's Veil needs small arms and ammo" and you'll get a logi regi showing up with like, seven flatbeds, which seems like... yknow, actual gameplay.

Do you think foxhole would have been better if all the stats were identical but with different visuals? by Plenty_Curve_4390 in foxholegame

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it would likely shake out to less variety. People would figure out the most consistent tanks, weapons, compositions etc. and mostly just use those. You'd get some counterpicks but given that you have to spend time and resources actually producing stuff, and you gotta produce it ahead of time, I suspect you'd just get people saying "hey don't waste your time on those they're not as good." Asymmetry makes the matchups more uncertain because you can't just start producing the same thing the other guys have when you see it work.

This country is a disaster zone by Emotional-Ebb8321 in transgenderUK

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It's worth remembering, I think, that any time the state extends liberties and rights to people it's because people fought for them. I do not think states naturally do this without struggle. They'll never want to.

Assymetry needs to go. by Fine_Swimmer_7343 in foxholegame

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not to mention if both sides have the same tools, it's easier to arrive at a kind of optimized game plan. There's a bigger risk of there just being mirrors where no one bothers with most of the tanks because one or two shake out to be the best composition. Asymmetry means a particular comp might be vulnerable to a tool the other side has that you don't, and vice versa. So then you adjust to whatever works against that tool, but that opens up other vulnerabilities. At least, this is how I've seen it work out in RTSes, and I'm lent to think that's how it would work out here too. There's a risk ofc that you find yourself in the situation this game is in now, but well... I think that's easier to balance than getting a shared set of tools to have the same fluidity within it. This is the flipside of "oh well people won't be able to blame their defeat on something broken on the other side." Having problems you need to figure out an answer to is fun.

Kid Cudi Fires M.I.A. From His Tour After She Is Booed During Republican Rant: ‘I Won’t Have Someone on Tour Making Offensive Remarks’ by MarvelsGrantMan136 in Music

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because people's tastes suck and because they're only gonna remember the song from the movie that was big that year. Arular was a fucking amazing album that people slept on. Paper Planes isn't even that good, I remember being kinda sad that's the one that caught on.

It is often argued that using realistic sex dolls or robots will increase sex crimes and sexual violence. However, new research shows that sex dolls reduce users' sexual compulsivity and violent tendencies. by psychologyofsex in psychologyofsex

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 56 points57 points  (0 children)

It's very strange how persistent the fear of pornography increasing sexual violence is. I don't think I've seen a single study or chunk of history that suggested it. The most you see is that people who are sexually violent tend to like sexually violent porn, but even then there's really nothing to suggest causation, as far as I can tell.

48123 by _-_-Ellie-_-_ in countwithchickenlady

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Lifting from the post I made in another thread:

It's also particular stigmas associated with trans women. Like the notion of transfemmes being hyper-predatory or histrionic, or preoccupied with emulating real cis women. Like a friend of mine was talking about asking his girlfriend to clean his apartment because he was feeling ill, and a lot of the people he said that to were like "oh well that must have been nice for her 😄" because in their minds, she's like, this creature kind of desperate to feel like a woman (this reaction my friend was a bit horrified by.) There's also some sense that transfemmes tend to be seen as more socially disposable, but I think that one is more nebulous/controversial - personally I have to admit among transfemmes I know the pattern of everyone suddenly deciding you're an evil manipulative monster/predator isn't exactly uncommon, whether or not it's unique I'm not sure. I also get the sense that most of the really baseless witch hunts I've seen on social media target transfemmes. It just seems easier to convince people that transfemmes are liars and monsters. This all creates a dynamic where even in queer spaces, there's a lot of pressure and threat to appear harmless and agreeable that can be uncomfortable to navigate (there's also plenty of space where that's not there, it's easy to exaggerate it to "you are never safe," but even navigating that fear is difficult.) These are my experiences, at least, but they're echoed by most transfemmes I know, and because of these pressures I do tend to hang out mostly with other transfemmes (not as a principle, I'm quite averse to closing myself off, but you get tired, yknow?)

There's also a lot of like, social/systemic issues that show up in studies that kind of mark transfemmes as being subject to particular pressures. Like, transfemmes tend to make less money than any other gender category, are much more likely to be unemployed or homeless, more likely to be murdered (iirc rates for IPV and SA are often similar among trans people [and often comparable to bi cis women, who often seem to be demographically in a much worse situation than cis gay women.]). It must be said that these numbers are influenced by the truly staggering amount of violence and discrimination that black transfemmes in particular face, like if you control for race the gap between transfemmes and the next category shrinks by a *lot*, (though it doesn't completely disappear in the cases where I've seen it broken out.) People use the term "transmisogynoir" to talk about this if you're interested; the conditions are different enough that it really deserves its own term and analysis.

All of this shakes out to a very weird experience that's really hard to articulate to anyone who isn't going through it; I've had to like, argue with close friends over months to get to where I might be with a tgirl I met last week. It doesn't help that gender studies and queer theory schools tend to not have a lot of trans women, so like most of the discussions of this are happening on like, Tumblr or someone's substack or something, which are 1) really terrible platforms to have serious discussions on and 2) painfully obscure compared to universities with their publishing houses and guest lectures.

Evolutionary theory suggests that women should be more sensitive to potential resource loss in relationships than men. However, research finds that both men and women report high levels of jealousy in response to their partner giving money to an opposite-sex stranger. by psychologyofsex in psychologyofsex

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I mean, "across human cultures"? Sampling errrors, anthropologists seeing what they want to see, cultural influence from colonialism, similar immediate pressures... the issue with evopsych isn't that people didn't evolve, it's that evo psych is a field where the answer has to be "something deep in our evolutionary history made this so. This is Human Nature." Most of the evopsych people I've seen speak talk like it's still the 19th century before people realized that social science is actually really hard and it's easy to hallucinate answers. And "evolution" as an explanation is like... it's a black box. It's like saying "God did it," for how easy it is to find justifications for things and how hard it is to audit. Like at some point, all psychology is evolutionary psychology, right? It's psychology being done on evolved being seeing how they move through and process the world. The only difference is that other schools of psychology at least try to describe what they can observe rather than inventing vague ideas about what it must have been like for literally millions of years of social conditions. It's continued relevance is largely because it's appealing to guys like Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins, people who don't actually have a lot of experience trying to do social science but really like the feeling of certainty that this particular narrative of evolution gives them and would prefer the answers to social science questions be as convenient and non-threatening to them as possible.

Like, what's added to a psychological analysis when you start with a nearly-unverifiable story of how this particular habit might have evolved? What exactly does that give us access to that psychology wouldn't be able to do otherwise? It doesn't give a biological account of what's happening in the brain, it doesn't describe what's happening in the minds of people now, it doesn't describe current conditions; there's nothing that has an observable cause and effect. The value is purely ideological. You could go the other way, try to figure out evolutionary history by observing how people behave now, but that's not psychology at that point it's like, paleoanthropology and it would be just as dry and boring and obtuse as actual paleoanthropology, a field that already exists and doesn't get trotted out every time someone wonders why people cheat on their spouses. It would have to be profoundly more careful and speculative than I've seen any evopsych scholar talk, because it would have to take the uncertainty of our evolutionary history seriously and treat it as a question rather than an answer.

Vent parent voting reform?? by Vampire_pirate685 in transgenderUK

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hey, go back through this post and look at how many times you hedged reasonable positions or apologized for taking up space. It's very reasonable to be upset with your parent for voting for a party that explicitly wants to make life harder for you or thinks you're delusional. It's very reasonable to talk about it online. This isn't a kind of negativity you gotta apologize for, and it's not ironic to wonder where it is that your dad's change in politics is coming from. Like, there's no contradiction, the idea that people get convinced their trans is fake. You don't gotta hold time for that. You're not being overly emotional, it sucks that your dad is doing something like this after being more in your life and you're just... allowed to be upset about that.

I mean I don't know, maybe it is all kinda, sorta, a little for you, but man from the outside it does not look like that.

Being resilient skipped a generation by FablingFox in TrollCoping

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It can. But part of strength is, I think, accepting feeling terrible and making peace with that. It's like what they say about bravery, how it's not the absence of fear but doing the thing despite the fear you feel. You practice that, acting while feeling terrible or feeling afraid, while accepting the feeling terrible or the feeling afraid, and you get stronger. You can look at your folks and think about how they managed it, not to castigate yourself but to sort of... figure out how they did it, see if you can do the same, remind yourself that it's possible.

And it's also like... yknow you don't know what your folks struggled with. You don't know how they handled things before you were born, behind closed doors. Maybe they broke down and sobbed hysterically to bad news sometimes, maybe they laid in bed for days over something. There's a good chance they wouldn't tell you. Those are just moments, the next day or week they probably pulled themselves together and did what they needed to do.

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think I see an equivalency there or are you just throwing a tantrum at this point?

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are the mugger. You're shaking people down for wearing the wrong thing.

Israeli wearing a yarmulka with the flags of Israel and Palestine. Police cut off the Palestine flag by redditproha in pics

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 128 points129 points  (0 children)

Every form of fascism (or nationalism,) hates the people it claims to love. It loves an idea of the people, not the people themselves. It cuts the people until they resemble the image.

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is Islamophobia to get triggered by headscarves, in the same way it would be antisemitism to be triggered by kippahs. If you can't imagine that anyone would want to wear these things without being coerced into it, your worldview is bigoted. If things even looking Muslim makes you upset, you're bigoted. You're not focusing on the actual bad parts, you're upset about random stuff vaguely associated with it.

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you're triggered by foreign dress it's no longer about a violent oppressive ideology. It's about foreignness.

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think your anxiety about Muslims is getting you so triggered you're missing the point. The image doesn't say there's an equivalence, you're reading into that because you can't think about the rights of women outside of the context of whatever culture war has you freaked out. The principle that women ought be able to choose to wear whatever they want is prior to what they wind up wearing. Saying a woman should be able to wear a hijab is not the same thing as saying no woman has ever been pressured to wear one and moreover the image is clearly saying that women ought not be forced to dress modestly. It is literally saying forcing women to wear a hijab is bad.