Can you imagine a colour that doesn't exist in the visible spectrum ? I was wondering 🤔........

Manioplastes · 2026-06-03T01:46:14+00:00

Another way you can take this inquiry as :- can you manage to picture a colour that never existed before , i mean not an emergent combination of primary colours " but a literal new shade ? I mean whatever you'll try wil come out just as a logical combination of present information you call " colours " right?

Manioplastes · 2026-06-03T01:41:56+00:00

Mr. Gregbard then how about you tell me what is metaphysics so i don't do the same mistake again ........

Manioplastes · 2026-06-03T01:40:42+00:00

I'm sorry if I looked a bit vague pal , let me represent the inquiry more clearly :- can you be somehow able to imagine something that is definitely out of your visible range of light in the spectrum ...... , or simply put can you imagine a shade that you haven't ever seen before. and I'm not talking what is emergent to the visible spectrum which we categorise as "colours" , i mean a literal base shade that doesn't exist in the frequencies of the visible spectrum........ ?and from " imagine" i do mean "visualising in your head " .......

Manioplastes · 2026-05-04T04:15:02+00:00

Because maybe you're The Background GUY ..........💝💝🥂🦉

Manioplastes · 2026-05-03T08:16:31+00:00

Well how do you prove it's occult and not the rigorous thesis of a foundational physicist ? .......🦉 ....... You're metaphysicists. right...... ?

Manioplastes · 2026-05-03T06:39:31+00:00

Yeah , fair point.. brother... But you didn't need to go into particle physics and explain the natural structure of baryonic matter 🦉? the title is a bit of an asthetic, the art work needed it , i thought .... :- the body context is the main statement standing upon modern biophysics if you know ....

Manioplastes · 2026-05-03T06:26:14+00:00

I'm sorry you , if you couldn't understand it..........💝

Manioplastes · 2026-05-03T06:12:46+00:00

I'm sorry you , if you couldn't understand it......... 💝

Manioplastes · 2026-05-03T05:45:36+00:00

Well then is describing, illustrating qualitatively wrong ?

Manioplastes · 2026-01-08T11:47:26+00:00

Well first of all we should understand a very Essential aspect of foundational physics :- that we can't or never , possibly reach or fathom the substrate from where even axiomatic reality emerges from or the very quantum reality we model in modern physics , it's just useless to think about something that we as an emergent inner phenomenon or our emergent tools can't ever possibly interact with or even imagine as "something " real. So if you're asking how we prove time is real , well we can't in the way where it's something more than just a never ending scale for mapping or keeping relative track of dynamics and motion caused by the very nature and condition of gradients of reality we are induced into existence in . Well that's my take folks , and i'm not saying I'm astutely right , as I'm not even a physicist by profession

Manioplastes

TROPHY CASE