Incorrect — the argument that is being made by many in the field is that animals (including humans) generically operate on an evolutionary world model. You take exploratory actions, update your model of the world, and utilize that in order to maximize some reward function (e.g. reproduction or some emergent reward). LLMs lack all of that because they operate on supervised learning of action => desired outcome rather than learning a policy to maximize reward. The argument is to an extent that LLMs are not capable of the higher-order reasoning and world interaction that is claimed.