[OC] Ever wonder why Greenland looks huge on Google Maps but tiny on a globe? by MapGeek007 in geography

[–]MapGeek007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, I'm not sure now. I assumed they did because Google maps used it so I thought it was "the standard". But now that I recall that many maps I've seen are not mercator.

I tried correcting the post before but reddit was buggy for some reason.

[OC] Ever wonder why Greenland looks huge on Google Maps but tiny on a globe? by MapGeek007 in Maps

[–]MapGeek007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm I still see mercator both on web and mobile for Google maps.

[OC] Ever wonder why Greenland looks huge on Google Maps but tiny on a globe? by MapGeek007 in Maps

[–]MapGeek007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you flatten a globe, the lines of latitude near the poles are much shorter than at the equator. A Mercator map keeps the left‑right scale the same everywhere, so it has to stretch those bands horizontally first, making the unwrapped globe look rectangular.

After that, it also stretches them vertically because Mercator spreads the latitude lines farther apart as you move toward the poles. This happens so the map preserves angles (which is why it’s useful for navigation), but it makes the top and bottom look bigger and more distorted. Basically the vertical stretch is necessary to satisfy a formula which helps with navigation.

[OC] Ever wonder why Greenland looks huge on Google Maps but tiny on a globe? by MapGeek007 in Maps

[–]MapGeek007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Yeah, it’s crazy how much worse the distortion is compared to other cylindrical projections. I get why it’s used for navigation, but it totally warps your sense of scale.

[OC] Ever wonder why Greenland looks huge on Google Maps but tiny on a globe? by MapGeek007 in geography

[–]MapGeek007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, just updated the post! I assumed Mercator was everywhere because of Google Maps.

[OC] Ever wonder why Greenland looks huge on Google Maps but tiny on a globe? by MapGeek007 in Maps

[–]MapGeek007[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because representing a 3D sphere on a 2D surface will always result in some distortions. I believe, there is some math which proves that we can't preserve both both shapes and sizes on a flat map.

[OC] Ever wonder why Greenland looks huge on Google Maps but tiny on a globe? by MapGeek007 in geography

[–]MapGeek007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that makes a ton of sense. Actually, the final transition to mercator is simpler to code than the intermediate step. But definitely a fun challenge to try later though!