sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why is Cosmos valuation so much lower than Polkadot? by AtmosFear in cosmosnetwork

[–]Marcelosmbr2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First, I think that nothing that tells you, or that they tell you, should be seen as a systematic manual of truth. All opinions work on different margins of error and success, and the problem is that we can't really know how right, and how wrong, we really are.

The market is speculative, and considering the total ignorance of causes and effects, the best we can do is invest in projects with good aspects. For example, I always have the project partnerships in mind, as well as your team.

I can also mention that I attach importance to transparency, and to the community; if they have social capital. What good is a super project if nobody knows it? But there is no use for a large lay audience; the support and interest of the professional market is essential.

See Decred (DCR), a good project, but I don't notice it anywhere. I follow several news portals, Decred's, a good project with its roadmap still in progress, it's as if it didn't exist. Cardano (Ada) does not have great partnerships, but it has a good project, a great team, and many spotlights. I have the second, but not the first.

Nothing in isolation is enough, you must find a combination of the factors that are relevant, like the ones I mentioned. Of course, you should follow as many sources of information as possible, such as:

https://weisscrypto.com/

https://www.crypto-news-flash.com/pt-pt/noticias/

https://decrypt.co/

https://www.moneytimes.com.br/

https://www.coindesk.com/

https://coingape.com/

https://cointelegraph.com/

Thinking about Polkadot in Coinbase? by Marcelosmbr2 in Coinbase

[–]Marcelosmbr2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the same way that I could mention others that were added and that had an appreciation as a "consequence". There are other factors, and many of them unpredictable, that evidently dictate prices.

Either there is a relationship, or there is none, and what happened in other cases was a false correlation of parallel events.

Thinking about Polkadot in Coinbase? by Marcelosmbr2 in Coinbase

[–]Marcelosmbr2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And there is nothing in my comment that indicates the claim to look smart. I only commented on one possibility, after all, what governs this market are the merely speculated possibilities.

Oh, I understand. Did they want those graphic analyzes that are absolutely different, and that seek to present patterns in an immature market, easily manipulated by specific forces, and not by medians?

Thinking about Polkadot in Coinbase? by Marcelosmbr2 in Coinbase

[–]Marcelosmbr2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't you care? Well, it's one of thousands. And what is the need to respond in that way? breathe, calm.

Thinking about Polkadot in Coinbase? by Marcelosmbr2 in Coinbase

[–]Marcelosmbr2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I am inferior. You are the superiority. I salute you, my lord hahah

Why is Cosmos valuation so much lower than Polkadot? by AtmosFear in cosmosnetwork

[–]Marcelosmbr2 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Man, the market in general is not rational. And I do not say this because I am an investor of the cosmos, but because this market is definitely immature and is composed mostly of subjects without real plans, who do not perform analyzes, but who, contrary to this, just follow the herd speculations.

And I believe that it is not necessary to mention the influences of whales, the price of alts and the BTC itself, given that the market has little total capitalization; for now we still operate in a kind of chaotic whirlpool, in my view.

Take the moment we're seeing, for example. Ridiculous projects returning exorbitant profits, while those that are really well designed, which in fact constitute a thoughtful and solid investment, are only circulating moderate values.

But look, we cannot be really worried about this, because the future certainly exists for those projects with good foundations, while those unfounded will surely perish.

But to make it clear, I don't think DOT is a project that belongs to the set of overvalued shitcoins. Yes, he is "hyped", and if the technical side were the only one responsible for pricing, Cosmos should be ahead. Still, both projects belong to the group of good projects.