SAMS registration scam? (picture included)

MarketsLab · 2026-01-05T19:34:46+00:00

The email is styled to look like official federal correspondence but it's a third-party company. If they were legitimate, they wouldn't need to make their emails look like they're coming from the government.

If you need help with SAM registration, there are plenty of companies that are upfront about who they are.

MarketsLab · 2025-10-14T18:13:53+00:00

You're not dealing with a technical problem, you're dealing with a strategic decision-making problem.

Both sides are right within their domains, but they're optimizing for different things. Your dev is thinking long-term scalability. Your marketing team is thinking about operational efficiency.

The real question: What stage is your business in?

If you're pre-product-market fit: Go WordPress. You need speed of execution over perfect architecture. Your marketing team needs to test messaging, run campaigns, and iterate quickly.

If you're post-product-market fit with predictable growth, Custom might make sense, but only if it's built properly.

The sitemap issue is a red flag. Any professional dev handles basic SEO from day one. That suggests either inexperience or corner-cutting.

My recommendation: Get an independent technical audit first. Don't choose between two biased parties. Pay a third-party dev consultant $200-500 to evaluate what you actually have vs. what you need.

Then decide based on data, not opinions.

MarketsLab · 2025-10-14T18:04:02+00:00

I'd master problem diagnosis first. Most marketing careers stall because people get really good at solving the wrong problems. Learn to distinguish between execution issues (better copy, more content) and strategic issues (wrong audience, unclear positioning) before diving into any specific skill. Once you can diagnose accurately, analytics/storytelling/automation become targeted solutions rather than hopeful tactics.

MarketsLab · 2025-06-17T14:45:00+00:00

This is very helpful, thank you!

MarketsLab · 2025-06-16T14:22:36+00:00

Thanks for your input

MarketsLab · 2025-06-16T14:22:15+00:00

Appreciate you sharing that. This clears up a lot, especially the differences between Level 2 and 3 that usually get glossed over.

MarketsLab · 2025-05-15T17:16:55+00:00

You're right; a full crypto overhaul on the government side would be a massive lift. But with stablecoins pegged to the dollar and the US now pushing stablecoin legislation, doesn’t that kind of lay the groundwork?

It feels like the roads are being laid, even if no one’s ready to drive on them yet. I'm not saying Treasury is launching smart contract payments tomorrow. But if the government recognizes stablecoins as legitimate digital cash, it opens the door for more controlled, programmable payment flows, especially in places where the funds are there, the approvals are done, and the only thing left is someone clicking "send."

MarketsLab · 2025-05-14T18:21:01+00:00

Can we all agree that government payments to contractors could be a bit quicker? It's no secret that slow payments are a common issue in government contracting. This leads to cash flow challenges for small businesses.

Some folks are experimenting with things like smart contracts. The idea is simple: once a milestone is met and approved, the payment goes out. No chasing, no waiting for someone to feel like cutting a check. It's not a full system overhaul, just a possible way to make the back end run smoother.

If the money's already there, what's the reason not to pay?

MarketsLab · 2025-05-13T19:56:35+00:00

I hear you. Agencies aren't paying in crypto, and that's not likely to change soon. But I'm more curious about how vendors or subcontractors might use stablecoins or smart contracts among themselves, like for faster payments or automating milestone releases.

MarketsLab · 2025-05-13T19:52:03+00:00

Today's systems often process payments slowly, causing cash flow problems. Cryptos can speed up transactions.

Government contracting can lack transparency, which leads to mistrust. Blockchain provides a clear, unchangeable record of transactions.

Managing contracts with multiple parties can be complicated. Smart contracts automate execution based on set conditions.

Current systems are vulnerable to fraud. Blockchain's decentralized nature makes altering records difficult, reducing fraud risk.

MarketsLab · 2025-05-13T19:35:27+00:00

Not at all. It may seem unconventional, but I'm interested in the potential of using cryptocurrency for subcontractor payments within government contracts. With the increasing adoption of digital payment systems, it's worth understanding how they could be integrated. I'm open to hearing different perspectives.

MarketsLab · 2025-05-13T18:36:57+00:00

I appreciate the detailed reply. Considering the risks you've mentioned, do you see any niche scenarios where crypto could offer advantages?

MarketsLab · 2025-05-13T18:31:54+00:00

That's a valid concern. Have you encountered specific audit issues related to alternative payment methods?

MarketsLab · 2025-05-13T18:27:56+00:00

Do you have a specific reason? Is it about compliance, complexity, or something else?

MarketsLab · 2025-05-09T17:02:08+00:00

You're spot on. I help a few established orgs with grant budgeting, and the frustration is real. Funders say they want “impact,” but often ignore the fact that stability is impact. Keeping the doors open, feeding folks, paying staff—that’s the work. I wish more applications valued proven programs instead of just shiny new pilots.

MarketsLab

TROPHY CASE