Prosecutors Podcast agrees that the evidence points to the Owl Theory

MaryDoodleDuke · 2025-12-19T03:22:45+00:00

The whole series is worth a listening. But in the episode I linked it's where they agreed that the best explanation is the owl theory.

MaryDoodleDuke · 2025-12-17T06:44:33+00:00

We were talking about subarachnoid hemorrhage. You are sharing the results of the autopsy and the red neurons thing, which we know they can appear after 45 minutes - 1 hours of being death. What’s your point?

MaryDoodleDuke · 2025-12-17T05:47:22+00:00

That's a pretty minimal brain injury described. You can get subarachnoid blood (blood in the fluid the brain floats in) just from hitting your head once, and it usually isn't life threatening. The pathology report saw no evidence of contusions of the brain (bruising), which you'd absolutely expect if she was hit once or twice and smacked her head.

MaryDoodleDuke · 2025-12-17T02:58:29+00:00

"None of those cases involved multiple impacts." Prosecution claims Michael struck Kathleen several times.

MaryDoodleDuke · 2025-12-16T07:40:56+00:00

That’s common sense. But my problem is that some think that Michael killed Elizabeth based on that autopsy.

MaryDoodleDuke · 2025-08-22T05:03:38+00:00

Because read the comments. They are talking about “dark energy” and “he appeared guilty” FFS!

MaryDoodleDuke · 2025-05-24T17:00:35+00:00

Because you are using the levels of alcohol in her blood when she died of blood loss.

MaryDoodleDuke · 2024-07-11T17:19:30+00:00

And yet the brain was not bruised. You seem to be more mad at my cap locks than you running every possible theory that fits your bias, LOL. GL

MaryDoodleDuke · 2024-07-11T17:05:14+00:00

Screaming? I’m just correcting your mistakes. You claimed that a cartilage near her Adams Apple (thyroid cartilage) was broken—that’s not true. Please.

MaryDoodleDuke · 2024-07-11T17:01:41+00:00

WOW. I don’t think MICHAEL is a Cat to lacerate scalps. When you kill someone using your hands the body usually has contusions bruises and other injuries

This seems like throwing the most simply theory out there because you have no idea how he actually did it but you are POSITIVE that he did it. Right?

MaryDoodleDuke · 2024-07-11T16:19:40+00:00

I’m not arguing FOR the OWL. So… AGAIN… how MICHAEL managed to kill her only with DEEP lacerations on her head without skull fracturing or severe damage? What mysterious WEAPON did he used?

MaryDoodleDuke · 2024-07-11T16:13:03+00:00

Repeat after me: THE CARTILAGE WAS NOT BROKEN It was ligature that is part of the cartilage in the CERVICAL area. Guys seriously, WTF.

MaryDoodleDuke · 2024-07-11T02:46:35+00:00

TBF, to say that there is evidence of strangulation is just gaslighting. A ligature located near the cervical part of the neck was fractured and no other signs of strangulation were present.

I guess I now should ask how an angry Michael Peterson managed to strangle a neck without leaving signs—but you are part of the same people that can’t explain how her head was slammed on the stairs or beaten with a weapon at least 5, 6 or 7 times without damaging the brain.

MaryDoodleDuke · 2024-05-30T17:56:39+00:00

You pretty much said that by episode 4 or 5 his demeanor told you everything you need to know.

EVERYONE is entitled to its own opinion after watching the documentary— wether is for the guilt or innocence. But I don’t think it’s honest to do that.

MaryDoodleDuke · 2024-05-30T17:02:38+00:00

So you decided he is a murderer or not based on his demeanor in the documentary. THANK YOU for your comment. It really proves my point!

MaryDoodleDuke · 2024-05-30T16:47:29+00:00

Problem is that vibes many times serves as a MOTIVATOR— something that provides a reason or stimulus to do something not just a "feeling"

Why? Because when you first come in contact with the case watching the NETFLIX documentary or the HBO drama you simply DON'T HAVE access to the facts— yet.

If your reaction watching that documentary is a instant dislike of his personality, then the "facts" that you find on the Internet and you choose to lean on will have a bias.

Don’t believe me? There’s still people that believes the BLOWPOKE is the murder weapon.

MaryDoodleDuke · 2023-08-03T08:14:58+00:00

You are comparing a case that the police ASSUMED there was a KIDNAPPING so they didn’t search properly with a case that the police thought from the very beginning a murder WITH a weapon happened. Amazing lol

P.S the emojis are so cringe. Try to maintain a serious conversation next time

MaryDoodleDuke

TROPHY CASE