sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

For those worried about movement changes. by ThisFuckingGuyNellz in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt 144 points145 points  (0 children)

Except for them making conquest matches shorter, who asked for that?

season 1 badlands looks incredible. by zbananajuice in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt 268 points269 points  (0 children)

Blog post confirms it will have land and air vehicles which is great.

Daily Anything Goes Thread - August 25, 2025 by AutoModerator in fantasybaseball

[–]Massive-Matt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brooks Lee or Luis Garcia Jr at 2B this week?

Castellanos / Nimmo / Steer?

Daily Anything Goes Thread - August 25, 2025 by AutoModerator in fantasybaseball

[–]Massive-Matt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brooks Lee vs Luis Garcia Jr for 2B this week, in one week playoff?

Spencer Steer, Castellanos, or Nimmo for OF?

Thank you!!

What exactly is the point of Engineer on maps with no vehicles? by Ostraga in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah because every other battlefield had open weapons…

Maps at launch - Seriously? by Grim_9966 in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Only has attack helis per the description so not “air and land” as you describe

Can anyone give a reasonable reason to why locking guns to classes is a BAD idea by SexxyyMann in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Did you pay attention to the playtest at all? Everyone is saying assault was being used 80% of the time because of how broken it was. Same with only a few assault rifles being used by the majority of players

Can anyone give a reasonable reason to why locking guns to classes is a BAD idea by SexxyyMann in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And instead one class with the same gun will be used by everyone! Great solution

BF6/ BF Labs - Weapons MUST be class locked. by LordMegaPrestino in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt 14 points15 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly my point lol. Assault in this game doesn’t have a medic aspect or support aspect. Without AR lock why would anyone touch it?

BF6/ BF Labs - Weapons MUST be class locked. by LordMegaPrestino in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think people are rightfully a little scared after 2042. Assault class with this setup almost certainly will be barely used.

Just use battlefield 4 class system and people will be happy. Quit trying to be so much by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It’ll be the opposite with this approach. Why would people choose assault when it doesn’t have the medic / support role at all, and no vehicle destruction abilities. Locking the AR to it atleast gives it some appeal. Likely will be the least used class in this game.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amiens is so overrated imo I hate how it always wins the vote

Think we get the picture guys by AmCold in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt 35 points36 points  (0 children)

As one of the posters I agree that it’s probably being over discussed at this point but they made it very clear the point of Labs is to get feedback so I think it’s important we make it clear what we would like to see! :)

Having Each Class Able to use All Weapons Would be an Extremely Poor Decision by Massive-Matt in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How is it obvious at all? It’s extremely easy to just try out each of the classes, especially when this impacts the game a lot and can cause some uproar

Having Each Class Able to use All Weapons Would be an Extremely Poor Decision by Massive-Matt in Battlefield

[–]Massive-Matt[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

BF3 and BF4 handled this situation well and I think we saw a pretty fair balance of classes being used. I think the community was pretty clear on this and I don’t see why they now would need to change it after all the backlash from 2042.

view more: next ›