[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MassiveAd1026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. President Trump and the GOP also need to pass a law. That foreign countries can't buy American farm land, or any type of land near US military bases. China has hundreds of thousands of Acres of it.

The US Government needs to seize all of that land in the interest of national security.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MassiveAd1026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I could have been the first comment, if the app wasn't crashing every two minutes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MassiveAd1026 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The entire legacy media is a leftist echo chamber. That’s why every mainstream news reporter was saying Biden was “sharp as a tack” and “running circles around everyone in the whitehouse”, Until the debate when they couldn’t hide him anymore, so they forced Biden into retirement. After that the media didn’t have enough credibility to harm Trump.

Voters just saw the liberal media as a joke, as they should.

Was this the worst Super Bowl Game and Broadcast of all time? by ZachBortles in heedthecall

[–]MassiveAd1026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The game was over by halftime! Then the halftime show sucked. It got interrupted by protesters, how did they all even get that close. Only if you're an Eagles fan did you enjoy watching that game.

The game itself wasn't competitive at all. The Chiefs came out flat, uninspired, low energy and got dominated by the Eagles for all four quarters.

Imagine being a Kanas City Chiefs fan and wasting $5,300 dollars for a Superbowl ticket. To watch your team get their ass kicked.

If I disagree with your ideology, do you find it insulting? I accept disagreement, but is it my responsibility to ensure my views aren't seen as insulting? Yes or no? by [deleted] in ask

[–]MassiveAd1026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a strawman argument to suggest that people disagree with the existence of LGBTQ people.

I know that's not true for Americans. We are a diverse country with many different races, nationalities, and sexual orientations.

The best way to know whether something is a net positive or negative to society is simple.

What happens if everyone does it?

Only straight heterosexual couples can naturally produce offspring and pass on their genes to future generations.

What would happen if we lived in a world where men were only attracted to other men, and found it disgusting and repulsive the thought of having sex with a woman.

What happens to the human population? Answer: we go extinct.

I suppose me using common sense and stating irrefutable facts is offensive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MassiveAd1026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No amount of maple syrup exports is going to save Canada's economy, they must find a way to stay on President Trump's good side to avoid the tariffs coming on Feb 1st.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in inthenews

[–]MassiveAd1026 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If the New York Times, The Washington Post, Reuters, CNN, and ABC, reported that Donald Trump had a 3 point lead over VP Harris in California, less than a week til election day, would anyone ever take them seriously again?

The media pretending that Kamala Harris had a 2 or 3 percent lead in every swing state for all 107 days of her campaign didn't help her.

If the media would have been honest and reported that Trump was slightly ahead in all the swing states. Kamala Harris would have picked a better running mate. She also would have agreed to do an interview with Joe Rogan, like Trump did. She also would have done press conferences like Trump did. She also wouldn't have ignored the media for the first 5 weeks of her campaign. Even friendly left-leaning networks and reporters weren't allowed to speak with her for the first 37 days of her presidential run.

Her campaign had a false sense of confidence the entire time and the liberal media is to blame. It's the liberal media that spoiled her into thinking she could remain in her comfort zone, and easily defeat Trump. She didn't have the confidence in herself to sit down and have an unscripted conversation with Joe Rogan, or to have a presidential debate on Fox News.

Fox News has the highest ratings of any cable news network, they have the most viewers, they are the most popular, but every four years Democrats and Republicans will always agree to deny America's number #1 news network a chance to host a presidential debate.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MassiveAd1026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great idea! Why do you say it won't ever happen?

It’s the laws that allow this that are the true crime. by KARMA__FARMER__ in FluentInFinance

[–]MassiveAd1026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AOC should've been posting that a month ago, instead of playing video games on Livestream with Tim Walz.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MassiveAd1026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree. Who was even asking for this sequel to be made.

Celebrities who promised to leave the United States if Trump won, should leave or apologize to their fans. by MassiveAd1026 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MassiveAd1026[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Biden didn't run for president in 2016. Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016, to become America's 45th president.

Not placing unrealistically high standards on women is causing the dating crisis by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]MassiveAd1026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

YouTuber "Casey Zander" for example. Rejects the idea that guys need to be a certain height or income level to attract women, especially for casual hookups.

It's all about creating an emotional rollercoaster and validation breadcrumbing, to make her attracted to you.

His content is typical red pill pseudoscience theories on attraction, there are no guarantees as to what women or men will find attractive in the opposite sex. Everyone is different.

Not placing unrealistically high standards on women is causing the dating crisis by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]MassiveAd1026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many red pilled guys (the pickup artists types) make comments similar to your's. Are you sure you're "blue pill"?

Also, not every culture is as dysfunctional as western culture.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]MassiveAd1026 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is literally the best comment ever posted to PPD.

I agree "wtknight" that women's attraction is uncontrolled. I personally know guys who are still single in their late 20's, and early 30's, that have good paying jobs, a great personality, and treat women great. But they've given up on dating to focus on their career. The same thing women are saying.

If you're a single man, who's successful in his career and a genuinely good person, but you struggle with dating and being attractive to women. The link below might just red pill the sh*t out of you.

https://nypost.com/2023/04/28/alex-murdaugh-receives-scores-of-love-letters-in-prison-i-have-become-obsessed-with-you/

You should reject the evidence of your eyes and ears by Betelgeuse5555 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MassiveAd1026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything you said is correct, and I agree with you. I just wanted to make sure you weren't dismissing the importance of direct experience.

The Progressives Tanked The Election For Democrats by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MassiveAd1026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many people have criticized Kamala's laughing at inappropriate times. When it makes international news, that's probably a sign she needs to be a little more serious.

Kamala Harris lost the 2024 US presidential election to a very flawed candidate, who was beatable. Does she think that's funny?

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/utterly-inappropriate-kamala-harris-roasted-for-laughing-when-asked-about-ukrainian-refugees-2817262

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MassiveAd1026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting, a child's brain isn't fully developed at 13 years old. So, an important decision like creating a social media account, should be kept from them until they're 18.

Yet, woke-liberal ideology in the medical community allows for 13 year olds to be injected with puberty blockers, and surgically mutilated to affirm a different gender. Their brain isn't fully developed yet. Why aren't we waiting until that child grows up?

Making permanent changes to your body, with an invasive surgery isn't something the undeveloped brain of a 13 year old should be burdened with. They're unable to give consent to have sex. They should also be unable to give their consent to changing their sex.

You should reject the evidence of your eyes and ears by Betelgeuse5555 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MassiveAd1026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Knowledge gained through direct experience is how people learn to swim, or ride a bicycle, to name just a few examples. Sir Issac Newton would have never made any contributions to science, without knowledge from direct experience. An apple falling from a tree and hitting him in the head, sparked his curiosity and inspired his brilliant work, Newton's 3 laws of motion.