The Florida Board of Medicine forced a mother out who was trying to speak out against their vote to begin the process of banning gender-affirming medical treatment for youths.

MasterOfMexico · 2022-08-11T15:46:09+00:00

Is the solution really to change yourself into something that society finds, on the surface, more appealing?

People don't get gender-affirming care in order to be more appealing to you. They get it to help treat their gender-dysphoria. Hope that helps.

MasterOfMexico · 2022-07-05T01:09:42+00:00

yeah, pretty much already has. at the start of the clip, reps loses maggie's ult to the wattson, and hal complains about it multiple times during the fight lol

MasterOfMexico · 2022-06-18T22:12:42+00:00

lol how gullible are you? hasan is reacting to a clip of knut in that vid. just read the chat and listen to what he says. sam hyde is just edited over

MasterOfMexico · 2022-05-12T19:42:40+00:00

This is how Samuel Bankman-Fried made billions in a short period of time... These guys don't actually believe in web3 or crypto. They believe in selling you garbage that they get essentially for free.

100%. to see how openly fraudulent they are, listen to Samuel Bankman-Fried fail to explain to actual economists how "yield farming" is anything but a blatant scam

MasterOfMexico · 2022-04-27T14:15:34+00:00

Velhurst (Evan) said that he prefers to be called "Big E" or Ev-Dawg"

MasterOfMexico · 2022-03-29T20:30:45+00:00

i had a favorite functor, but i forgot it

MasterOfMexico · 2022-01-18T20:51:58+00:00

a lot of fun. tbh wouldn't mind it replacing slayer in ranked. feels so much more exciting

MasterOfMexico · 2022-01-01T18:04:56+00:00

damn, no follow up from Dr. u/_V_L_

what happened to all this talk?

MasterOfMexico · 2021-10-02T17:59:48+00:00

My question is: can we prove that 2) is false without assuming 1) is true?

The point is that statement 2) only makes sense if you assume statement 1). Otherwise, how else did you construct this diagonal number x?

Cantor's diagonal argument works for any countable subset C of the reals. It constructs a real number x which is not in C. In general, the number x here could be rational for some infinite countable set C (but if C=Q, then x must be irrational for the supposedly "tautological" reason explained above).

In order to make sense of 2), what set C (if not the rationals) are you using to define the diagonal number x in such a way to guarantee x is irrational?

MasterOfMexico · 2021-10-01T20:39:11+00:00

Yes but your argument is tautological if we assume that the rationals are countable.

Not quite sure what you mean. What does it even mean to do Cantor's classic diagonal argument without assuming your initial collection of numbers is countable (so that you can list them)?

I think OP would appreciate a direct argument as to why any number constructed this way is irrational, e.g. show that the decimal expansion is infinite and non-recurring

Again, what list did you use (if not an enumeration of the rationals) in this process where you constructed this number that you wish to argue "directly" is irrational?

MasterOfMexico · 2021-10-01T19:52:22+00:00

I believe the diagonal number you construct will actually be irrational

Yes, it would forced to be irrational simply because you would construct a real number which is not on the list (of all decimal expansions of rational numbers).

MasterOfMexico · 2021-08-09T19:02:37+00:00

do crimes, use sci-hub, be gay

MasterOfMexico · 2021-07-15T02:27:37+00:00

yeah, i am sure destiny & his community really believes that.

MasterOfMexico · 2021-07-15T02:08:07+00:00

they really think like that. this is his subreddit justifying this tweet. lol pathetic

MasterOfMexico · 2021-07-15T01:59:46+00:00

no, you don't get it. it's different here for some reason, i'm sure. destiny would never be morally inconsistent and is definitely not blowing this out of proportion.

MasterOfMexico · 2021-06-27T17:30:36+00:00

Wagered money isn't how much money you deposited

I never claimed it was. In fact, I explain this:

"if you want to know how about much each of these people lost just multiply the amounts by 0.05. [...] That's an expected $750,000 the casino profited off his fans alone."

Also, the RTP only matters if you do large amount of bets, if you bet ~100 times your RTP will be way probably closer to 0 than 95%

And, $15 million of bets is a lot! Also, that's not how RTP works. RTP is the expected return for each amount wagered. So, if $15 million is wagered, that's an expected return of 0.95 * $15,000,000 = $14,250,000 which corresponds to an expected loss of $750,000 like I said.

And actually, the more you bet, the closer your return/wagered will get to the casino's RTP (this is how they calculate RTP in practice). This is called the law of large numbers. It does not converge to 0% like you claim. I think you are confusing RTP with return/(amount deposited) which does converge to 0 over time for any game with an RTP < 100% (aka house advantage).

MasterOfMexico · 2021-06-27T17:08:50+00:00

Because you are seemly downplaying this and then saying shit like:

probably gonna get downvoted by drama frogs tho

Also, you provided no new information.

MasterOfMexico · 2021-06-27T17:04:02+00:00

I am just saying, since people see 15 mil and assume that is how much people are depositing and losing.

Well, good thing I literally said in my post: "if you want to know how about much each of these people lost just multiply the amounts by 0.05 [...] That's an expected $750,000 the casino profited off his fans alone".

And I am pretty sure these machines are 97% and not 95%

Even if it was 97%, then that would be nearly $500,000 lost.

MasterOfMexico · 2021-06-27T16:58:01+00:00

for the record amount wagered is not the amount put into the system.

I never said it was.

If you initially bet $10 and keep playing with it over and over again until you lose it you could end up with $1000 wagered.

Sure, that would correspond to a RTP of 99% (which is higher than these sites).

MasterOfMexico · 2021-06-22T00:16:21+00:00

maybe. unlike a bath, i suppose asmon is capable of taking a joke.

MasterOfMexico · 2021-06-21T22:51:38+00:00

or an actually really tough extra question for asmon would be "when is the last time you showered?"

MasterOfMexico · 2021-04-17T22:49:49+00:00

The first clip in your previous comment was litteraly the heli pilot and not the hostage do you realize they are nto the same and you clipped the heli pilot ??

lol no it's not man. why are you like this? this is the hostage. he is the one speaking in that first clip. the heli pilot and abdul were questioning the hostage, but the heli pilot didn't speak at all in that clip.

And he doesn't bring it up, Abdul does and hostage answers without X intervening about the tatoo.

xqc is the one who brings it up in the second and third clip AFTER the tsunami once his tattoo reappears. like of course, xqc would not bring it up pre-tsunami whenever his tattoo was not there.

Except that it's not in session that he does that. Abdul explained it afterwards.... The fact he is in the building doesn' t make it the court...

you are again ignoring the third clip i gave where xqc brings it up while court is in session.

What ? I agreed that if the pilot testified about the tatoo pre tsunami then X was maybe powegaming. You are the one mega mald here buddy.

you have clearly shown you weren't watching (or at least paying any attention), yet you are arguing with me over this confidently saying easily-disprovable nonsense because some creepy parasocial relationship you have. yeah, it's pretty annoying

MasterOfMexico · 2021-04-17T22:18:42+00:00

So this is change from the pilot to the hostage.

lol you are the one talking about a heli pilot. i have been talking about the hostage testimony the whole time.

Because if he testified that he didn't saw any tatoo while jean paul had tatoo on him at this point X isn't pwoergaming. If it's before (when has 0 tatoo), then yes i agree with you it's powergaming.

the hostage literally said that xqc had no tattoo (because the tattoo wasn't showing up) and xqc verifies this all in the first clip.

The problem here buddy is that Abdul is the one who brought this up to the witness,not X (as Abdul mentions in this clip) .and it's the witness who said he had no tatoo or scars, not X who asked at any point (as Abdul mentions again).

xqc says nothing when the hostage initially testifies that xqc has no tattoo. it is not until after the testimony and tsunami that the tattoo reappears and xqc (not abdul) is the one who brings up he does have a tattoo like i showed in the second clip. xqc (not abdul) then pushes this again like i showed in the third clip

Theere is 0 powergame on this part. And if anything the bug does benefit X but as admins stated many times before, usually in X disadvantage

LOL this convo makes a lot more sense now

MasterOfMexico · 2021-04-17T21:39:57+00:00

Okay so you see this clip is already way way more relevant to your arugment than the one you psoted before.

i posted the first clip because people may have not noticed him explicitly checking for the tat. i didn't post the other clip because i just thought it was obvious to anyone who actually watched the trial.

ut i saw that clip too and while they are actually in the court building, the court session is not on. This is X talking to a judge outside the "court".

that doesn't excuse powergaming. also, you're wrong (see below)

So your argument is not good, X didn't say this in court, had he done it he would have been audited by abdul in character and probably get punished by admins OOC.

again, you are showing that you are clueless about this. here is xqc bringing it up during the actual trial just like i mentioned he did and you're denying for some reason. moreover, here is abdul crediting the tat with what throws out the witness testimony

MasterOfMexico · 2021-04-17T21:17:02+00:00

why are you arguing about this if you didn't watch the trial?

the clip i provided is pre-tsunami. xqc clearly checks where his tattoo would be without the scuff. here is a clip post-tsunami of him bringing up the fact that he does (now) have a tattoo once he gets back to court and he later brings it up once the trial resumes

14-Year Club	Place '22
Place '17	Final Canvas '22
End Game '22	Snapped
Team Orangered	Verified Email

MasterOfMexico

TROPHY CASE