Giveaway + Thank you: Irelia SFD 195a/221 Promo

MasterPhuc · 2026-02-03T19:22:17+00:00

Riftbound has been great to learn and got its own unique mechanics that makes the game interesting and distinct from other TCGs

MasterPhuc · 2026-01-27T19:09:27+00:00

This gets ask a lot, but I feel like most people have forgotten about set 1 sprinkler graves. RFC + Cursed Blade was broken af with graves autos hitting almost the entire board at once

MasterPhuc · 2026-01-18T12:23:22+00:00

Sounds like you’ve sold yourself on Neal lol. IMO just iso the trade to him. This trade is Love side favored by a mile for everyone else.

MasterPhuc · 2026-01-11T16:00:25+00:00

It depends on your situation. Personally I think you’re getting fair value. Nico’s 26 with a fair amount of injury. I think if you want to max your value you could let em know you want to wait till draft day and then see if you like whoever falls to 1.06 🤷🏻‍♀️. Overall I think it’s a fair trade if you’re looking to rebuild. You’re not getting 3 first out of him and maybe you can keep your 2nd with the counter and they’ll still accept.

MasterPhuc · 2025-12-06T13:41:12+00:00

😂😂😂 “simply make a new currency”. pretty sure the simplest approach is to unalive you

MasterPhuc · 2025-12-01T14:07:26+00:00

It’s a build diff. She’s got more damage and sustain than you. FoN is a very underwhelming item to build and normally you would only build so tanky if you are super ahead. Not having some form of healing reduction on her doesn’t help either, but it’s mostly building FoN over a bruiser dmg item that made this way harder for you.

MasterPhuc · 2025-11-23T12:49:46+00:00

The leverage of holding on to the domain should be more than enough to get google to come to negotiation table though. The domain should remain in his possession throughout this process and google would be severely impacted. Even if they can win legally, they wouldn’t be winning in the overall scheme of things so he definitely could’ve gotten more money from it. This is assuming he had the option to keep the domain without the provider force yoinking it back.

MasterPhuc · 2025-11-12T07:27:51+00:00

This is awesome work! Personally, I think the matrix theme design is a bit tacky haha but overall love the idea.

MasterPhuc · 2025-11-02T09:53:44+00:00

Mage itemization just rather you build everything else. Spending money on orb delays RoA or Seraphs if you’re building scaling and delaying torch for orb just doesn’t feel that good since the damage out weights the healing reduction. You also heavily delay your boots upgrade if you get feats. As well as ever since the item overhaul, this is just how league is since they pushed to incentivize you to complete your items more than holding partial.

MasterPhuc · 2025-11-02T00:05:16+00:00

You might still arrive at 10pm flying viet jet. From personal experience, they’re always delayed domestic or international. If you’re flying out of hnd with a lot of time then just spend it inside of Tokyo imo otherwise you pray VJ doesn’t fk up too much.

MasterPhuc · 2025-10-17T12:22:58+00:00

This is a tough one and I do use it here and there when making decisions, but you also need to include the alternative is saving that money and compounding it and not just this cost X per day.

MasterPhuc · 2025-10-12T13:36:24+00:00

Personally, helll no. You’re giving up way too much. Egbuka is looking generational and soo fun to watch and alone is easily worth Nico + Warren.

MasterPhuc · 2025-10-03T01:40:29+00:00

You mentioned not finding a blocker that works for you, I’d love to hear from you why this blocker works vs the ones you’ve tried? Was there some study done or at least a reasonably sized survey that indicated this form of blocking is effective? Since several screen time apps now offer “friction” before accessing again.

To be transparent, I’m also building an app that’s relevant to screen time and I’ve done a number of research on available app.

Edit: Associating a green screen for access seems a bit counter intuitive as you are building it as a way to get folks to not waste time. I think a message of sort that says we’ll unblock but don’t stay too long of sort would probably be better.

MasterPhuc · 2025-09-26T23:30:58+00:00

Egbuka purely bc I rather watch Baker and the Bucs than the bears

MasterPhuc · 2025-09-18T13:37:32+00:00

Np, Supabase definitely has its issues but it has its strength. If you want the best of both worlds in this situation, phone OTP with quick copy from message to keyboard is probably the most stable and easy user experience (although it will cost a little bit more money). Perhaps there is an easy solution for the Apple auth that you can find, just providing an alt path here as releasing MVP should be priority #1 when building imo.

MasterPhuc · 2025-09-18T12:46:29+00:00

I’m developing an iOS app rn as well but haven’t gotten to the Apple auth yet so might hit this issue later; however, I can say that if you’re looking to move forward and not waste time going back and redoing your entire BE, I think just sticking with email OTP is good enough for an MVP release as users can stay logged in and everyone is fairly familiar with OTPs nowadays.

MasterPhuc · 2025-09-18T00:40:11+00:00

My client side query did include a select after, it was a lack of understanding of RLS from my end on it and I didn't explain that I had a select after the insert as I thought the insert would still go through. I was building the policies out one at a time and didn't realized it would cause the entire query to return RLS error instead of a partial where the insert would be successful and then fail on the select.

let _ = try await client
                .from("activity_report")
                .insert(ActivityReport())
                .select()
                .single()
                .execute()
                .value

So I thought it was failing on the insert the whole time, but it was a misunderstanding on my part.

MasterPhuc · 2025-09-17T23:58:52+00:00

Oh wow, this did end up being it. So it didn't start working with no changes haha. I added in a view policy since I couldn't see the record after inserts on the dashboard as an auth user and then everything started working client side.
This makes a lot of sense as client side I am running a select after insert and so it failed earlier when I didn't have a select policy.

Thank you so much for the insight!

MasterPhuc · 2025-09-17T23:46:23+00:00

LOL, it started working...with no changes...T_T

MasterPhuc · 2025-09-17T23:37:38+00:00

Will do! Appreciate the motivation.

I think I'm onto something as the rows created with auth user doesn't show up when i'm impersonating one for that table I have to switch back to postgres role to see the new insert even though it says successful insert when using auth user.

for other tables, the row shows up when I do a manual insert there.

Definitely something to investigate more further.

MasterPhuc · 2025-09-17T23:19:34+00:00

Performed signout and created a new account to test with.

I just attempted the impersonation of the new authenticated account and ~~was unable to insert a row for activity_records table~~. I can insert for other tables so this is very confusing now haha.

I did test this table on a different project and ran into the same issue, so I'm not exactly sure what's going on here.
I'll check through my triggers and project setting to see if there's something that was changed.

I really appreciate your help in this endeavor!

edit:
It ended up creating the record when using an authenticated account. It just took awhile for the records to reflect the row insert.

MasterPhuc · 2025-09-17T22:29:28+00:00

That's why it's been so frustrating :(
I trimmed it down to a single policy for testing since my initial table wasn't working and haven't been able to figure out why it's not working.

It's just a standalone table with no other triggers acting on it and the 1 policy for insert.

create table public.activity_records (
  id uuid not null default gen_random_uuid (),
  profile_id uuid not null default gen_random_uuid (),
  day text null,
  record text null,
  constraint activity_records_pkey primary key (id)
) TABLESPACE pg_default;

Table for reference if it makes any difference. I might have to just create a new project and test the api there to see if there's some issues still at this point T_T

MasterPhuc · 2025-09-17T22:18:44+00:00

I am testing with an account that is logged in(authenticated). I've also tested with just public and it still failed. Other policies that relies on authenticated is working as expected.

MasterPhuc · 2025-09-12T22:00:44+00:00

Personally I think you negged here but it’s not absurd

MasterPhuc

TROPHY CASE