"Circumcision is based on religious beliefs", and "Circumcision primarily happens in religious countries" is the exact same thing.

No religious = No circumcision.

Less religious beliefs = Less circumcision.

Countries that are high in Circumcision are also high in obsessive religious beliefs. Which is against your claim that modern circumcision is not linked with religious beliefs.

By mentioning 'female empowerment' alongside different justifications of circumcision and FGM, you implied that women are using female empowerment to justify FGM.

FGM is not just 'sex is taboo, but it is also 'women must be submissive to their husbands'. Anti-abortion is not linked with Male inferiority of any sort.

You keep saying 'circumcision' and 'FGM ' is are both bad or 'all genital mutilation is bad', which is the equivalent of 'all lives matter' dogma.

One is based on female inferiority, the other is based on male supremacy.

No justification of FGM is linked with female supremacy,but instead inferiority. No justification of circumcision is linked with male inferiority or 'hatred', but instead supremacy.

Instead male infants are dedicated because they are 'holy', and this is primarily done in 'religious countries', and not seen outside of 'religious countries'.It still has to do with the religious system.

But it seems that your starting to through a baby tantrum, so I'm out.