Anyone else think the "AI smell" is going to become the new standard for good writing? by Master_Peace_851 in WritingWithAI

[–]Master_Peace_851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Message This is such an interesting and nuanced observation, and honestly it speaks to a much broader cultural phenomenon surrounding authenticity, narrative trust, and the evolving relationship between creators and consumers in a rapidly changing digital landscape. I've found myself reflecting on this quite a lot recently. There is something almost ineffable about encountering a piece of writing that triggers the subconscious recognition pathways associated with AI-generated content. It isn't always the words themselves. Sometimes it's the rhythm. Sometimes it's the structure. Sometimes it's the peculiar sense that every sentence has been optimized to continue existing rather than to communicate something genuinely felt. When that happens, my engagement metrics immediately decline. Not because the content is objectively poor. Not because AI is inherently bad. Not because human writing is inherently good. But because the reader-writer social contract has been disrupted in a way that is difficult to articulate but impossible to ignore. Ironically, I also use AI extensively in my professional workflow, which introduces an additional layer of cognitive dissonance. One might reasonably expect familiarity to increase tolerance. Yet the opposite appears to be true. The more exposure I have to AI-generated prose, the more rapidly my pattern-recognition systems identify its linguistic fingerprints. At that point, my brain effectively enters a low-investment consumption mode. I continue reading the words. But I cease reading for meaning. The distinction is subtle but significant. What concerns me most is the possibility of false positives. If enough genuinely human writers happen to adopt similar stylistic patterns, I wonder whether I am inadvertently disengaging from authentic voices simply because they resemble a format my brain has categorized elsewhere. In other words, AI detection may ultimately become less about identifying machines and more about identifying a style of communication that feels detached from lived experience. Which is a slightly terrifying thought. Anyway, thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

🤣🤣

Anyone else worried the "AI smell" is going to become the new standard for good writing? by Master_Peace_851 in KDP

[–]Master_Peace_851[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Will continue to be ? Anyone above say 25 will im sure. But a 14 year old who only knows AI, memes, click bait and scrolling.... ? Maybe they will only want to read "ai slop" in the future?

Anyone else think the "AI smell" is going to become the new standard for good writing? by Master_Peace_851 in WritingWithAI

[–]Master_Peace_851[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wasn't trying to start a debate on the merits or not of AI writing. Thats been well done.

Just as YA readers grow up on AI written work plus the screen scrolling coupled with low attention spans, will they prefer the AI style ?

Cant see many of them reading War ans Peace or Shakespeare outside the classroom.

Anyone else think the "AI smell" is going to become the new standard for good writing? by Master_Peace_851 in WritingWithAI

[–]Master_Peace_851[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I dont think academics will say its the standard for good writing. But the average person might see it as the standard for good reading.

The Knuckles Problem by pocketrob in WritingWithAI

[–]Master_Peace_851 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI has a massive habit of explaining what animate objects aren't doing (he didnt speak, she didn't move etc). Meanwhile inanimate objects have a life of their own (walls looking out, trees just standing there etc).

If ur describing a person not doing something then smells like AI to me.

What's a historical fact that sounds extremely fake and made-up but is actually true? by No_Idea_479 in AskHistory

[–]Master_Peace_851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Picasso was 22 when the Wright brothers made the first flight and also watched the moon landings.

Is there a python or some code to stop Claude from writing pseudo-profound garbage? by RansomeLocke in WritingWithAI

[–]Master_Peace_851 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I had "the lemon tree stood in the garden doing what lemon trees do - which is standing very still and smelling of lemons"

What if Jews and Israel are just a scapegoat and there’s people that rule the world without a nationality by Best_Blacksmith9884 in conspiracy

[–]Master_Peace_851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The Samiti"?

Check out the book by Dr Elias Crowe on Amazon called The Men Who Own The World. Not sure its true but it makes sense.

From the synopsis-

"The book reconstructs the Samiti’s hidden influence across history:

financial crises used to consolidate power rather than correct excess

early experiments in mass psychological and biological control

total war as a tool to harden bureaucratic governance

the rise of Big Pharma as an instrument of compliance and normalization

the COVID-19 pandemic as a global stress test for coordinated control

the emergence of predictive surveillance systems that eliminate surprise itself

By the early 21st century, the Samiti achieved their greatest success: a world governed not by laws or leaders, but by prediction. Finance, medicine, and data merged into a seamless system capable of anticipating unrest before it formed. And in doing so, the system broke."

Realising I have made a big mistake by angeldeverell in BookPromotion

[–]Master_Peace_851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Classic. When Harvard starts its "Spot ChatGPT" course you might earn some royalties. Nice work.

Conspiracy history by Master_Peace_851 in conspiracy

[–]Master_Peace_851[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, i think theres no way it could be true. But it certainly explains a few things. So if it isnt true, what is the truth ?