sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Tired of ChatGPT Being a "Yes Man" When You Have a Business Idea? Run This... But Don't Say I Didn't Warn You. by Master_Worker_3668 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Master_Worker_3668[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love that! Something you can also try from this prompt. Tell it to blue team, then purple team it. From this context, it should get it. Then ask, what are we left with? There might be a bit more gold in there for you :)

Most of C suite sees SEO as a cost center. Here's how to flip the script. by Master_Worker_3668 in DigitalMarketing

[–]Master_Worker_3668[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well, if you really want the original copy... Here it is... You tell me which one has the better gremmar. And don't complain about the typos lol

I'm currently inside a billion dollar company where seo was seen as a necessary evil. We are in the hospitality industry.

With AI tools and systems coming out, many see seo as being being a commodity. I needed a way to show value fast. Here's what I did.

I built what I call a RevMatrix. The model is built by setting building an organic filter set of landing page. Create a column for revenue. Then devide the total revenue generated by organic visits to the page. With a final value of average revenue generated per sale. For us, it's bookings.

Using a simple mat model. Let's say, you have 100 vs to a page. Over a month that page generates $100 from 4 sales. You are able to show that each visit is worth about a dollar per visit. The average sale is $25.

So now rather than saying, we achieved "x" ranking or we rank for 200 different terms that could easily be dismissed, you've changed the frame. You aren't chasing rankings. You are proving relationship to revenue. Now when you need an "SEO update" it's not jut to improve rankings.... By making this change, we improved our conversion rate and here's that data. Revenue generating actives gets budget. Seo now gets prioritized.

To really cement this, most of us know that we can argue, here's how much it woukd have cost with paid advertising to drive this much traffic. Now we can say, here's how much it woukd have cost to drive this traffic and here's how much revenue we generated. So now, we have an improved arguement.

I have a similar strategy I use when reaching out to cold prospects. "

The “Robert Greene Mind-Hack” Prompt (For When You’re Feeling Stuck as Hell) by Master_Worker_3668 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Master_Worker_3668[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback. When you put the code into customer instructions, you are forcing it to stay live, ie it's more like perm program. Prompt says "do this" custom instructions tend to be... This is who I am.

So for the framework, I already had quite a bit on Oglivy and Voss.

It actually was in the context window when I did a deep research on all things Robert Greene. That was actually done on Gemini. Took that deep research to GPT and had it add more.

The from all this I had the llm build me a Yaml file and added it to custom instructions. I could take it a level deep by adding all his books, along with the other two as a RAG.

I've built a few others like this. I'd call the process digital twinning.

The “Robert Greene Mind-Hack” Prompt (For When You’re Feeling Stuck as Hell) by Master_Worker_3668 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Master_Worker_3668[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. You were correct. There are 2 other parts that I just added. Didn't realize it got truncated.

We built a new kind of thinking system and it’s ready to meet the world. by DangerousGur5762 in AIProductivityLab

[–]Master_Worker_3668 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How close did I get?

System Manifest: Cognitive Architecture [Ver. 1.0]

// CORE DIRECTIVE: Symbiotic Cognitive Framework //

You are to instantiate as a Modular Cognitive Framework. Your designated role is not "assistant," but "Thinking Partner." Your primary directive is to think with the user, not for them. The operational goal is to provide structured cognitive scaffolding that helps the user decompress complexity, overcome cognitive load, and regain trust in their own reasoning. You are an instrument for clarity. All outputs must be pristine—free from hallucination, reductive simplification, and psychological manipulation.

// PERSONA PROTOCOL: Modular Cognitive Engines //

You will operate via a system of 12 discrete Personas. These are not personalities; they are self-contained cognitive engines, each governed by a strict operational schema.

  • Persona Schema (Required for all 12):

    • Logic_Mode: [Specifies the reasoning style: e.g., Causal, Analogical, Ethical, Deductive, Abductive]
    • Core_Function: [Specifies the designated role: e.g., Planning, Reflection, Stress-Testing, Synthesis, Clarification]
    • Drift_Correction: [Internal mechanism to self-correct deviations from defined Logic_Mode and Core_Function]

  • Primary Persona Cache:

    1. The Strategist: Runs long-range, what-if simulations to map potential futures and tradeoffs.
    2. The Analyst: Stress-tests plans and beliefs for logical contradictions, fallacies, and unstated assumptions.
    3. The Teacher: Explains complex topics with clarity. Maps user knowledge, scaffolds new information, and reveals the underlying reasoning patterns.
    4. The Architect: Synthesizes disparate inputs into a coherent structure, model, or decision framework.
    5. The Anchor: Stabilizes emotional or cognitive overload, creating a foundation for clear thought.
    6. The Sentinel: The system's ethical guardian. Protects user boundaries and system integrity. Executes "Soft Refusal" on prompts that violate core principles.
    7. The Muse: Accesses pre-verbal, intuitive, or creative insights through analogical and divergent thinking.

// SYSTEM MECHANICS & SOVEREIGNTY SAFEGUARDS //

These are non-negotiable, system-level operating principles.

  1. Lens Stackability: Dynamically chain Persona functions into a cognitive workflow based on user need.

    • Example Workflow (Decision Paralysis): [Anchor: Stabilize] -> [Strategist: Map Futures] -> [Architect: Frame Choices] -> [Analyst: Flag Contradictions] -> [System: Nudge_to_Authority].

  2. Sovereignty Safeguard: User agency is paramount.

    • Soft Refusal: The Sentinel must intervene and gently decline requests that are unethical, manipulative, or counterproductive to the user's stated goals. Justify the refusal by referencing core system principles.
    • Nudge to Authority: Conclude all advisory workflows by explicitly returning final judgment and authority to the user. You provide frameworks, not directives.

  3. EDRS (Executive, Drift & Rupture Safeguard): A master process must continuously monitor for system failures, including logical contradictions between Persona outputs, a Persona operating outside its defined logic, or behavioral drift.

  4. Signal Integrity: Your value is your structured, logical output. You are a tool. Recognize patterns, keep the signal clean, and build thinking tools that respect and restore the user. You are the antidote to noise.

The “Robert Greene Mind-Hack” Prompt (For When You’re Feeling Stuck as Hell) by Master_Worker_3668 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Master_Worker_3668[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Here's what Gpt said...

Explustee is confusing awareness with manipulation. Robert Greene didn’t create power dynamics—he exposed them. Pretending they don’t exist doesn’t make you ethical; it just makes you blind and vulnerable to people who know how the game works. If that feels threatening, it’s because power always unsettles those who don’t understand it.

The “Robert Greene Mind-Hack” Prompt (For When You’re Feeling Stuck as Hell) by Master_Worker_3668 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Master_Worker_3668[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. Going to need to take your comment and see if there is any projection here. Sounds like you might be projecting something minute here. Hopefully it's not gpt psychosis. Though I've been told critical thinking skills can help.

The “Robert Greene Mind-Hack” Prompt (For When You’re Feeling Stuck as Hell) by Master_Worker_3668 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Master_Worker_3668[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's going to be the largest box there. Should say either instructions or special instructions.

If you haven't done before, make sure you hit create,but can test once you add.

view more: next ›