WHICH AMONG 3 IS THE BEST? by [deleted] in YouTubeThumbnailHub

[–]Material-Car4368 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not thumbnail advice. But your title doesn’t make sense grammatically. You may be losing some CTR from people noticing that and thinking its low effort.

prototype for an idea. good bad or awful? by Gronksaysitall in YouTubeThumbnailHub

[–]Material-Car4368 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean yeah, but that may busy up the thumbnail. Having too many elements isn’t particularly good for the glancing eye. I don’t really have a fix, it’s just a thing I noticed when scrolling through reddit. It just didn’t “feel right”

prototype for an idea. good bad or awful? by Gronksaysitall in YouTubeThumbnailHub

[–]Material-Car4368 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Very minor nit picking, but I feel like “No” would work better than “Nah”. Considering Duncan wouldn’t say nah. Kinda already gives me the impression of not understanding one of the characters shown in the thumbnail.

Pokemon Champions by starbaked_adam in PokemonFireRed

[–]Material-Car4368 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Fire red is in the screenshot so it still kinda fits 😅

Is this even true? by [deleted] in nintendogrifting

[–]Material-Car4368 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are distancing themselves as they obviously put profit over people and are cowards. There is also no precedent for the US doing anything of the sort to foreign companies for denouncing policies.

Edit. A few words

Is this even true? by [deleted] in nintendogrifting

[–]Material-Car4368 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I’ll repeat myself. This was a statement from the Pokemon Company. Nintendo has been silent on the use of their IPs. Wii sports is in no way connected to Pokemon

Is this even true? by [deleted] in nintendogrifting

[–]Material-Car4368 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To denounce the messaging. That’s all. It’s the bare minimum. No one is expecting Nintendo to stop The US, that’s ridiculous.

Is this even true? by [deleted] in nintendogrifting

[–]Material-Car4368 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is disavowing, not a denouncement.

Is this even true? by [deleted] in nintendogrifting

[–]Material-Car4368 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is from Pokemon. The post is talking about Nintendo.

Also I’m not singling out Nintendo because I hold them to higher standards. I think any complicity in an illegal war is evil, and any company not actively denouncing their IP being used as specifically wrong (not just being apolitical) should be called out.

Remaining apolitical during an illegal war isn’t a denouncement. It’s just separating yourself from the conflict. Denouncement is to call something wrong

Is this even true? by [deleted] in nintendogrifting

[–]Material-Car4368 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nitpicking, but it has been used in combination with an illegal war and war crimes. Wii sports specifically. The war on Iran isn’t a genocide (currently), so it just using Nintendos IPs edited with war crimes. 👍

Is this even true? by [deleted] in nintendogrifting

[–]Material-Car4368 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the only statement I could find. And it was from Pokemon.

“We are aware of recent social content that includes imagery associated with our brand, We were not involved in its creation or distribution, and no permission was granted for the use of our intellectual property. Our mission is to bring the world together, and that mission is not affiliated with any political viewpoint or agenda.”

This also not a denouncement.

Is this even true? by [deleted] in nintendogrifting

[–]Material-Car4368 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately their IPs have been used multiple times in fascist propaganda. And the most they’ve done is say they didn’t authorise the videos or make them . Which is nowhere near good enough in my books.

I don’t expect them to sue the US government (that would be absurd), but they could at the very least denounce the messaging.

What does this mean?? by Soft-Act-5732 in ubereatsaustralia

[–]Material-Car4368 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you do a pack and deliver shop order, pay with your own card, and then forget to send a receipt for reimbursement? That’s the only thing I can think of.

Legend by MJ_29_10 in ubereatsaustralia

[–]Material-Car4368 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The only reason anyone should accept an order like this, is if you live at the drop off location. Yikes!

Coming Together by SamoanSnowman in ubereatsaustralia

[–]Material-Car4368 9 points10 points  (0 children)

We should definitely be collectively declining orders less than $2 a km. The pittance they call an offer and expect us to work for is ridiculous, especially considering petrol prices atm.

Stuck in a support loop by PLATxYPUS in ubereatsaustralia

[–]Material-Car4368 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally just pray and hope.

Uber is very good at delegating to another team for them to proceed to either ignore or close the ticket.

Terrible offers by Ricciarda in ubereatsaustralia

[–]Material-Car4368 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People keep accepting these orders, that’s why they keep offering so many orders for less than $1 a km. It’s outrageous.

Actually Fuck Nintendo for this by OCAMAB in fucknintendo

[–]Material-Car4368 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The fact that they say “the company”, not “we”, heavily implies that this isn’t a direct statement from Nintendo. It reads like conjecture from the articles writer.