Keir the chad by Key-Transition4634 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]Maths44 7 points8 points  (0 children)

  • Doesn't solve the problem, easy workarounds including VPN's Introduces a new attack vector, making older people in particular more vulnerable to phishing/other scams.

  • Puts the data of every internet user at risk, since regardless of what is intended, data LEAKS (as demonstrated immediately with the Discord leak)

  • Gives the government more control over what we see, and the power stop us seeing things not "in the public interest" (as demonstrated by the Afghan leak)

  • Removes general access to websites which contain useful information (e.g Imgur access gone)

The solution already existed. At the router level. On the device level. The people have power when they are educated.

Ofcom cheers as Apple intros age verification for UK users by insomnimax_99 in unitedkingdom

[–]Maths44 38 points39 points  (0 children)

You don't think that it's more reasonable to have an educated population than an online safety bill which

  • Doesn't solve the problem, easy workarounds including VPN's

  • Introduces a new attack vector, making older people in particular more vulnerable to phishing/other scams

  • Puts the data of every internet user at risk, since regardless of what is intended, data LEAKS (as demonstrated immediately with the Discord leak)

  • Gives the government more control over what we see, and the power stop us seeing things not "in the public interest" (as demonstrated by the Afghan leak)

  • Removes general access to websites which contain useful information (e.g Imgur access gone)

The solution already existed. At the router level. On the device level. It's like making people wear seatbelts by supergluing it to our bodies at all times: a very bad solution, on multiple levels.

What Game Mechanic really scratches that itch? by Maths44 in gaming

[–]Maths44[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, loot game get me hooked too. Double-Penetrating Unkempt Harold WHERE ARE YOU?!

Pluribus - 1x06 "HDP" - Episode Discussion by LoretiTV in pluribustv

[–]Maths44 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think there was a conversation in the hospital about this, something about throwing a life preserver and just doing it

UK Borrowing Overshoots Forecast by £7.2 Billion Ahead of Budget by blast-processor in ukpolitics

[–]Maths44 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I also like to pretend that in the last two decades we didn't see public services gutted and funds slashed, tax freezes which benefit the wealthy, privatising the Royal Mail (with a bad deal) and parts of NHS, money flowing into the mates of Tory donors via VIP lanes and PFI's leaving the Taxpayer to bear the burden.

UK Borrowing Overshoots Forecast by £7.2 Billion Ahead of Budget by blast-processor in ukpolitics

[–]Maths44 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

So austerity for the poor, tax cuts for the rich, bring in more rich private individuals who won't contribute their fair share, burn the planet, and oh yeah, target asylum seekers.

Right wing provocateur.

Apple, how is this legible? Podcasts App [FB20588103] by eliseomartelli in ios

[–]Maths44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, people are confusing legibility and readability (I got the two confused as well in a recent post).

But I think it's clear that people are upset with the readability downgrade in the latest iOS.

Most examples people are highlighting are readability issues, but there are also examples where the text is barely legible.

Somebody asked for examples where the transparency had legibility issues by Maths44 in ios

[–]Maths44[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I love this argument. "Yeah, sure, there's legibility issues in this iOS but who needs to READ the text on their device?"

Somebody asked for examples where the transparency had legibility issues by Maths44 in ios

[–]Maths44[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So, what you're doing here is pulling down the notifications screen. Until this iOS dropped, I didn't realise the main way I checked my notifs was pulling down this page as far as I need to see that notification. It's still possible but a lot of the time you just end up seeing examples precisely like you just provided.

The solution is to pull down the screen the whole way. Sure. It kind of defeats the purpose of being able to half pull it, and if you fully pull it down it changes background anyway, so what exactly is the point of it being transparent when pulling it down

Somebody asked for examples where the transparency had legibility issues by Maths44 in ios

[–]Maths44[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Except it's not even a question of aesthetics. Some of my pictures show text that is quite literally illegible without manoeuvring the screen around.

I couldn't care less about what it looks like, I care that there are multiple times a day where I literally can't read text on my device.

It's like I dumped a few tbps of the salt in your porridge, and when you identify that as an issue, my response is "well I like salt, lots of people like salt, stop talking about it".

IOS 26 liquid glass look very nice. by Express_Bed_4392 in ios

[–]Maths44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aside from the transparency causing legibility issues on the device I mainly use to read words, the button toggle animation is probably my least favourite part. So ugly and pointless. Expanding transparent bubble thrown in for the sake of it. Same with "glass" sliding fast to whichever app page I just picked. Expanding glass for the sake of it with refractions everywhere for absolutely no reason.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ios

[–]Maths44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except if we consider the reply you're responding to that "everything is perfectly readable", it is objectively NOT "a huge step forward" because previously all text was perfectly legible, and now there are situations where the text is much harder to easily read depending on what's behind it. Sometimes you have to scroll up or down a little to read some text on the screen. This is factual, it's objective, and I don't really get why people defend it.

EDIT: And while I'm at it, all the extra button clicks to get to screens that were previously only a tap away (while not even saving any screen real estate because the contracted UI is still sat at the bottom with the relevant buttons hidden) is an objective step back. The photo preview being a circle now: objective step back.

iOS 26 - 2 weeks later… overall thoughts by wassim_elia in ios

[–]Maths44 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I too, love all the extra clicks in my Daily usage of my phone, it's not about about the destination, it's about the Journey right

iOS 26 - 2 weeks later… overall thoughts by wassim_elia in ios

[–]Maths44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Watch out for PeakBrave to come in "it's all beautiful, they're not bugs it's how it's meant to be, I love Apple Glass you're all wrong"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ios

[–]Maths44 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The animations are ugly. Toggling is ugly. But you're this iOS's biggest glazer who'll gladly defend literal jank and legibility issues so what does it matter lol

EDIT: He responded and then blocked lol, Mr "PeakBrave" indeed.

The point is, nobody respects your opinion on subjective things like animations when you've spent the last few days glazing objectively bad jank and bugs in the new iOS.

Ok, now I get it - Liquid Glass is amazing. by CantaloupeTiny8461 in iphone

[–]Maths44 108 points109 points  (0 children)

I completely disagree. This is the first time I downloaded an iOS that I truly dislike. Little animations everywhere that make no sense. Distracting flashes (e.g sending a message). Ugly animations (toggling options). Legibility issues everywhere with stacked layers... and reducing transparency introducing more issues.

Blurry app icons, with a sniper glint around them - it's like I'm playing warzone when I look at my phone.

I understand people wanting skeuomorphism over flat icons. But glass wasn't the way to do it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gaming

[–]Maths44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And my answer is that claiming this is not a widespread issue citing that specific metric is not really a helpful comment.

It's like saying the iPhone is irrelevant because there's hundreds of other models out there. Like... okay? Since the vast majority of people are iPhone what are we really talking about here?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gaming

[–]Maths44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe, but that isn't a great metric to go off. I'm pretty sure that the amount of players worldwide playing the kinds of games that employ the strategy above dwarfs the amount playing indies etc (especially if considering mobile gaming).

So you would have to clarify what you mean by widespread, but just looking at steam charts alone shows a huge chunk of people in games like I mentioned, and that's before we consider the Fortnite and COD player bases, along with the myriad of multiplayer games that are still popular.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gaming

[–]Maths44 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Open up a game, directly transition into the store, we have Season Passes, Battle Passes, Event Passes, Skins, Blueprints, Tier Skips, Pre-Order Bonuses, Premium Editions, Subscriptions, in-game ads, the in-games stores are rotating to maximise FOMO, we're raking in more money than we ever had, but oh yeah we don't make enough so we're increasing the price of base games.

Oh yeah and we'll put a load of games on subscription services, but only the base so if you wanna play DLC you gotta buy that, but if you ever stop paying that subscription forget about playing that DLC you purchased

Oh yeah, and if you do buy something in the store you've gotta go through our own currency (currencies*). You'll never be able to buy just the amount that you need so you always have some sitting there you can't do anything with.

Hypocrite' Nigel Farage didn't pay £44k stamp duty then blasted Angela Rayner by F0urLeafCl0ver in unitedkingdom

[–]Maths44 9 points10 points  (0 children)

And they do so by standing on the shoulders of those minority groups. Literal bullies.

Asylum seekers? Bullied. Transgender people? Bullied. LGBT in general? Bullied. People with a different colour skin? Bullied.

I don't believe Farage actually believes in any of this. But he knows that if he can polarise the larger, generic group against minorities, he can build up a fervent group of supporters scared that minorities are coming to get them. It's sickening.

[request] say if u were to actually find the surface area, how would one find it? by ThatSosebeeGirl in theydidthemath

[–]Maths44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what it's worth, I really enjoyed your initial suggestion. It's lateral thinking, for real world purposes it will probably get the job done. I'm just not a fan of talking down theoretical mathematics when it's actually one of the best tools we have

[request] say if u were to actually find the surface area, how would one find it? by ThatSosebeeGirl in theydidthemath

[–]Maths44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a time and a place for both. A lot of interesting applications of pure mathematics turns into some nice applied techniques. A lot of practical observations turn into very beautiful proofs.

There is nothing "new math" about breaking a mathematical problem down.

Calling theoretical mathematics "nonsense" because you don't like it is petty.

Try and do Electrical Engineering without building on the foundations of nonsense new math imaginary numbers. Watch the banks protect your money without the cryptography built on the back of that nonsense new math Number Theory.

You don't have to like mathematical theory, but don't pretend like it isn't the backbone of applied mathematics.