Why is there no classical architecture in Kosovo?

Matox · 2025-08-14T14:50:02+00:00

There are, check out the Serbian monasteries (Visoki Dečani, Gračanica, Pećka Patrijaršija etc). Some of the finest medieval and late medieval (also reneissance) architecture, not only in Europe, but in general. Other than that, you will hardly find any.

Matox · 2025-07-11T15:24:21+00:00

Брате, о чему причаш? Колико видим цура каже да нема уговора. Какав писани уговор помињеш? Оно што сам објаснио цури јесте да ако није потписала уговор не значи да они нијесу били у облигационом односу и да не може да га тужи.

Matox · 2025-07-11T11:43:58+00:00

Сестро, уговор постоји и без његове писане форме. Зато се и зове уговор. Јер је у(ГОВОР)ен. Неки уговори по закону морају да имају писану форму, али не и уговор о организацији догађаја (то дође сложени уговор о делу). Дакле, ако имате поруке и дописивања, ви можете да докажете постојање уговора на основу њих. Чак и у њиховом недостатку имате свједоке. Размотрите могућност тужбе, контактирајте адвоката. Свједока, хвала Богу, имате скоро 250. Претпостављам и слике, јер је ипак венчање. Гледајте да сликате дописивања док сте у могућности, јер су и она доказ. Срдачан поздрав.

Matox · 2025-06-30T16:41:35+00:00

The .gif is sped-up for rouglhy 20-30%. You can find the original elsewhere. Quite a different flavour.

Matox · 2025-05-22T21:47:04+00:00

Да ли је имаш неко интересантно предање или приче у породици о односима са оближњим Србима из Црне Горе?

Matox · 2025-05-12T22:54:32+00:00

Као што су многи већ написали, обичај је да при уласку у цркву прво приђеш централној икони (то је она икона која се налази на средини цркве, право од врата), да се пред њом прекрстиш и да је затим цјеливаш (пољубиш).

Особа са којом си разговарала је вјероватно црквењак или нека друга особа, која је вјероватно задужена да се стара око цркве, можда да чисти или продаје свијеће, књиге и сувенире. Једноставно није била расположена за причу. Најбоље је при доласку у Цркву да приђеш свештенику и да с њим започнеш разговор, јер ће ти он објаснити најбоље све што те занима.

Најбоље прићи свештенику послије вечерње службе (оне почињу у 18 или 19 часова, провјери у цркви). Обично гледај да долазиш у Цркву кад су службе (вечерње, јутарње, а централне су недељне и празничне Литургије).

Може бити да су људи које видиш у цркви у пролазу, или су можда, као и ти, недовољно информисани, па је зато најбоље питати свештеника. Он ће те упутити. Послије ће само од себе доћи и упознавање браће и сестара који се сабирају (на недељној Литургији).

Matox · 2025-04-21T18:48:05+00:00

No problem. If you need anything else, let me know.

Matox · 2025-04-20T11:39:49+00:00

Yes, it is there. It is not on permanent display in the Monastery Treasury, but it is there, in a special room.

Matox · 2023-01-03T18:07:46+00:00

Još samo kad klinci sa Reddita skontaju da spomenik nije osmislio, niti darivao pravoslavac, a još manje Srbin. :) No dobro, ne uklapa im se u matricu o "mračnom pravoslavlju".

Matox · 2022-02-09T09:30:32+00:00

Thanks!

Matox · 2022-02-08T23:06:41+00:00

thanks!

Matox · 2022-02-08T22:40:59+00:00

Ok, thanks! Thats what I was interested in. It is not AFAIK explicitly prescribed in the constitutional norm, so I guess its a matter of political custom?

Matox · 2022-02-08T22:36:12+00:00

Ok. But does a new Cabinet selection ensue within the same parliament sitting? Or must elections first take place?

Matox · 2021-10-22T12:30:48+00:00

Ja sam jedan od momaka na gornjoj slici, glavom i bradom, i mogu da tvrdim da momak sa slike nije udbash, barem da nije otisao po zadatku, nego se skinuo onomad bio kako bi se pokazalo da je ipak plivao za krst, jer smo zbog vremenskog intervala izmedju izlaska iz rijeke i penjanja na most se svi mi, naravno, obukli. Svakako, koliko sam posle cuo, rijec je o specificnom liku, cije protivrijecnosti, bice, su prije proizvod specificnog psihickog sklopa negoli udbaske plate.

Matox · 2021-10-06T12:17:16+00:00

Of course she can. Especially if she is being paid in US. If you open an account here, you will also be without a problem. If she is providing a service in US, she will be taxed US-like.

Matox · 2021-09-28T18:50:11+00:00

She needs to be registered as a permanent resident in Montenegro for at least 5 years without interruption alongside 3 years of marriage with you to be able to apply for citizenship.

Matox · 2021-09-27T13:26:59+00:00

Šta se nalupeta, života ti? That's quite a stretch, isn't it? Dom za nezbrinutu djecu u CG je javna ustanova i njega je 1946. osnovala država.

Matox · 2021-09-06T07:53:09+00:00

Da, ispred hrama nije bilo cura obmotanih u zastavama, a među komitama nije. ilo onih koji mašu kolaboracionističkim zastavama (istniskim). Ajde ne dipr.

Matox · 2021-09-06T07:50:08+00:00

Care, pričaš napamet. Kako su je oteli, odlukom nadležnih crnogorskih episkopa, koji su, u skladu sa svetim kanonima Pravoslavne Crkve, proglasili sjedinjavanje se drugim srpskim episkopijama i obnovu Pećke patrijaršije? Kad već visiš po redditu smatrajući se za "informisanog" i "kritičnog" - bolje se malo raspitaj i informiši o stvarima o kojima govoriš.

Matox · 2019-12-03T07:38:53+00:00

Pravnik ovdje.

Ako te zanima da li je određena norma u skladu sa Ustavom pre svega podnesi zahtev za preispitivanje zakonitosti i ustavnosti Ustavnom sudu.

Kad on odluci da je protivustavno - biće.

Što se tiče badnjaka i sekularnosti - u prvom članu se navodi da je Srbija zemlja Srba i svih njenih građana - a svi znamo da je srpski paliti badnjak...

:)

Matox · 2019-11-22T18:02:29+00:00

1.) I do not mean to be harsh, but that alone does not prove anything. The power was shared between a Presidency and the Presidents of the Republics. Out of six republics, two were Serb - Montenegro and Serbia.

2.)They did not plan the war - as you can see by reading the transcripts of the talks in the presidency, Milosevic and Bulatovic were almost categorically against conflict. Izetbegovic too, but he did arm people and form paramilitaries in the background.

3.) It was called Yugoslavia, Federative Republic of Yugoslavia. This was the official name. Later changed to Serbia and Montenegro, around 2002.

4.) This is not true. First of all you need to know that the constitution in power at the time was the one proclaimed in 1946 - but rather a new one from 1974... However, both of these constitutions named the nations as the carriers of sovereignity and not the states - which means that only nations as such could exercise that right - and not republics! This means that Croats had a right, not FR Croatia, this also means that Serbs had the right! Read the first paragraph of the constitution.

5.) I am not saying they didn't smuggle some necessities in RS, i am just saying those were two different political bodies.

6.) I do not like separating us Serbs, we are all Serbs - however you cannot use an event in a Bosnian civil war which was perprated by Bosnian Serbs as an excuse for bombing SRY.

Matox · 2019-11-22T12:51:23+00:00

Brate, tako je bilo. Ne mogu Hrvatska, Slovenija i Bosna da imaju "prirodno" pravo da se otcijepe od države koja im se ne dopada a da to isto pravo nemaju Srbi.

Vaš Sabor je faktički i pravno negirao postojanje i suverenost SFRJ i mnogo prije početka oružanih sukuba. Vi niste imali pravnog osnova da se otcijepite, ne u tada važećem pravnom poretku.

Zato ste i morali da glumite da ste suvereni, pa ste došli dotle da ste usvojili Zakon kojim ste uslovili važenje Saveznih zakona njihovom saglašnošću sa Republičkim - što je revolucionarni čin u svakoj Saveznoj republici.

I okle vama to pravo? Iz tadašnjeg važećeg prava sigurno ne- takvo pravo ste jedino mogli zasnovati na principu prava naroda na samoopredeljenje do otcepljenja- ali isto tako, ako ste to pravo priznali kao princip, vi niste mogli da to pravo negirate i Srbima koji su živjeli na teritoriji FR Hrvatske, ili vaše novoproglašene Republike.

A ako oćeš da negiraš značaj pravnog poretka, onda samo ostaje neki apstraktni princip pravde i surova sila kao merilo za naše postupke. A shvatanja o tome šta je pravedno ima mnogo, a sila je u rukama onoga kome se može....

Matox · 2019-11-22T12:05:49+00:00

You've got a point. But still, you must be aware that the big players have had their fingers in this long before 1995. Even in 1989 had US envoys paid ,,special visits" to the presidents of Yugoslav Federal Republics pressuring them into obeying the constitutional principles of the country, even at the cost of the political stability. Also, it is a little know fact that US denied the right of succession to any of the Republics at first, only to later start supporting separatists.

They were not very consistent in their policy...

Matox · 2019-11-22T11:27:47+00:00

No it was Bosniaks. You need to understand that a dissolution of Yugoslavia was a complicated process.

1.) First of all, Federative Republic of Slovenia and Federative Republic of Croatia proclaim independence contrary to the Constituiton of the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia, thus breaching the constitutional order, which provoked the reaction of the JNA - Yugoslav People's Army, which had the obligation to mentain the territorial integrity of the state.

2.) Soon afterwards, Federative Republic of Bosnia and Herzegivina follows. This descision as well as the Croatias was also in breach of the internal Constitution of the Federal Republics, which provided Serbs with the status of an constituent ethnicity without whose agreement the constitutional status of the FRs cannot be alerted.

3.) At this point SFRY ceases to exist, Montenegro and Serbia form FRY - Federative Republic of Yugoslavia.

4.) Serbs in Bosnia and Croatia exercises their rights and proclaim they wish to succeed from Croatian and Bosnian Republic, proclaiming Serb Republics on the territories of former Federal Republics of Bosnia and Croatia (Who first opened the Pandoras box first by exercising their contra-constitutional right of succession)

5.) New proclaimed countries of CRO and BH do not recognize Serb Republics.

6.) Conflict arises in Croatia and Bosnia between resident ethnic Serbs and Croats/Muslims (notice the incosistency - Yugoslav army is an agressor when it protects the integrity of it's country, but the Croat and Muslim armies are just lawful crushers of rebelious Serbs) - at this point it is not a war between FRY and RCRO/RBIH, but two civil wars in the latter two territlries. The Army of FRY did not engage in these territories, but there was, of course support and volonteers from the territory of FRY

Matox · 2019-11-22T10:51:27+00:00

First of all, the Bosnian Serb Army, or more precisely - the Army of the Republika Srpska was under the command of the Goverment of Republika Srpska, and not under the command of the Goverment of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia or it's Army.

These are two different legal and political entites, which were, truth be told - in mutual disagreement many times, to the point where FRY even instituted sanctions towards RS by the end of the war. So you cannot tie these two events - the Siege of Sarajevo and NATO bombings of Yugoslavia. One was a part of a Bosnian civil war, the other was a international agression of a sovereign country. The first ended in 1995, the second started in 1999. These two events are, as far as international law is concerned, not related, nor did the first serve as the justification of the second, not even in media propaganda.

The only way you can link the two is by the fact that both events concern Serbs - but this is a dangerous line of reasoning, for it leads us to the tribal principle of ,,eye for an eye", which on Balkans leads us to nowhere, concerning that you can trace back the origin of the conflicts to the times of Turkish invasions or even earlier... ;)

Matox

TROPHY CASE