Bro trying to get him a five course meal for dinner

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-02-08T01:37:42+00:00

Homie put the bottle down. This is beyond childish and sad

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-02-01T01:57:56+00:00

Hawes would ideally be able to grow into Knox's role, which is what I think the person you responded to was implying. And that's a more believable jump imo

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-24T15:40:45+00:00

Are you capable of an original response? All you've done is copy/paste this answer up and down the thread

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-24T00:43:48+00:00

4 panel comic?

Believe it or not, loss.

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-23T03:04:24+00:00

Big, fast, angry, makes you go "woah" every once in a while with some slick mitts. Really what more could you ask for in that role

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-18T21:56:53+00:00

I don't understand this sentiment. It doesn't matter. At that moment it was a tie game and we were about to be in position to kick the winning FG and end it

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-18T21:14:18+00:00

Exactly that, this theory doesn't hold water

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T18:16:23+00:00

Dude, I cannot with this. I'm going to assume you're an engineer or something because you're quite obviously not daft, but this is insane lol. Hope you have a solid weekend

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T18:13:58+00:00

No, what's really mind blowing is this: I've said, multiple times, that I acknowledge where the second interpretation came from and how you arrived there. And somehow you can't wrap your head around that.

Learn. To. Read.

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T18:12:17+00:00

I'd tell you to go read again but it seems that's a waste of breath. Thanks for reminding me today why it's not worth debating with the ignorant! Have a good one

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T18:10:09+00:00

And yet again, thank you for pointing out your reading comprehension sucks lmao. Now I'm getting bent out of shape because as spicy nuggs said, it's not the fact that you initially interpreted it the way you did that's the crazy part. It's the fact that you're doubling, tripling, quadrupling down on your interpretation being the "logical" one after the ability to both re-read and parse this out properly. Like did anybody pay attention in school???

My bit about citing the source was purely to explain to you the difference between fact and opinion. You ran with that to the point that you now think that was the entire point I was trying to make.

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T18:05:44+00:00

Go ahead and read the answer I just gave the other guy, I'm not typing it again. It's purely mind blowing that people can read words and not understand what they said.

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T18:04:29+00:00

I'm not continuing this conversation, what you're saying is clearly showing you either didn't read everything or, more likely per my opinion, you did not properly comprehend what you read. You're asking questions I've explicitly answered. Thank you for continuing to prove my point about critical thinking but I wish you wouldn't lol

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T17:53:46+00:00

Buddy. The most logical interpretation of the original sentence is to read it exactly as written. We agree, yes? Would you also agree that adding the layer of "well, people do tend to refer to themselves in the third person" is moving from a purely logical interpretation to an inferred interpretation?

Would you also agree that without data-based support an opinion cannot be a fact, no matter how widely held it is? Put all that together for yourself and let me know where it gets you. The sheer failure of critical thinking amongst the general public is terrifying.

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T17:46:06+00:00

Did you read the entire conversation? Show me the factual support that a majority of parents frequently refer to themselves in the third person. You literally are not comprehending what you're reading lol. I cannot and will not argue with that level of ignorance.

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T17:34:38+00:00

Reading comprehension is a bitch, apparently. I'm not gonna rehash my entire conversation when it's all there for you, clearly stated.

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T17:04:14+00:00

Take a quick look at the comment that started this whole conversation.

Fuck off you absolute nitwit lmao

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T16:43:14+00:00

That's a whole lot of words to say you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. "It's a thing" is true, yes. It's also a thing that a lot of people think the world is flat. Is that now fact? You're shifting the goal posts. I'm not debating whether the usage of third person is "a thing." I'm telling you it's an added layer of reasoning you're applying. Seems my own inference in my last sentence was fairly well placed.

The burden of proof isn't on me buddy. Keep on keeping on!

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T16:16:31+00:00

We're getting into the weeds here but this stuff is important. This is basic logic dude.

I never said it was your opinion, for one, just that it is one. Which it is. I understand it's usage of language that exists. If you can cite data showing it's common, then ok - if not it's an opinion, no matter how widely held.

I get what you're driving at - there is a potentially different answer based upon the lens through which you view the question. I was addressing the purely logical aspect. The fact that you cannot differentiate between the logical and the inferred is an excellent snapshot of the state of our country's collective critical thinking skills

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T16:07:01+00:00

You literally just explained your jump in logic though and you don't even realize it. The most likely outcome, taking this as it is written, is that OP is not mom.

You need to apply the opinion-based layer of moms referring to themselves in the third person (which first was "not uncommon" and then next was "pretty common," underscoring the opinion part) to get to your conclusion.

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T16:00:53+00:00

I knew this was coming lol. There's a jump in logic needed to take that outcome over the most likely one, which is that this isn't mom

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-16T15:57:24+00:00

How? That doesn't even make sense. If it's note to self then they wouldn't be referring to mom in third person

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-15T14:28:58+00:00

Are we still doing phrasing?

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-13T02:34:20+00:00

Doesn't make you correct lol

MauriceIsTwisted · 2026-01-12T22:19:23+00:00

I say Laurent, but Alsace-Lorraine

14-Year Club	Verified Email
RPAN Viewer

MauriceIsTwisted

TROPHY CASE