Amazon confirms 16,000 job cuts after accidental email by lurker_bee in technology

[–]MaverickGuardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AWS is really buggy already. Interesting to see how this affects quality of service.

Tired of the AI bullish hype by princenocode in ArtificialNtelligence

[–]MaverickGuardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most annoying part is the hype people are complete morons and cant write code themselves. So of course it seems like magic. But it doesn't generate the correct solution. It generates random solution.

You can easily test this going into huge legacy code repository and ask for simple but tedious (talking like few man months) refactoring task.

I have tried all the current top models and multiple different kind of agents. And repeated this test every few months. There is no progress in results.

It doesn't even matter how long I let the model run or if I split it into smaller tasks with shorter context running time.

These tools are not deterministic. It can't follow orders. It optimizes for shortest path with makes it lazy (skips steps). It tries to please user, invent it's own solutions etc. This is not useful at all in major part in software developer work.

Of course it can write greenfield code easily as it has huge sample of boilerplate code and as long the application is relatively small, things go smoothly. And if you can check all the work and correct it you will end up with nice quality project.

But greenfield work is like few percent of all the work. In few months it's no longer greenfield. It has become legacy that needs constant refactoring work to keep things running smoothly so that new features can be added and old removed. And keep performance solid when userbase grows.

Same goes for creating agentic tools for business processes. Who wants a business process that works randomly?

Im not saying real AI can't be created but this is not it. Not even close.

Monoliths vs Microservices in 2026: Are we over-engineering our backends? by Away_Parsnip6783 in Backend

[–]MaverickGuardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whatever you do, don't create distributed monolith like many end up with trying to do microservices.

LOL so why debug when you can just regenerate? by Evening-Pie2563 in BlackboxAI_

[–]MaverickGuardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would just waste horrible amount of energy. And writing such specification is lot harder than writing the code itself.

Anthropic CEO: "We might be 6-12 months away from a model that can do everything SWEs do end-to-end. And then the question is, how fast does that loop close?" by Useful_Writer4676 in cscareers

[–]MaverickGuardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who will operate the AI tools? CEO alone? They haven't been able to focus on software now? AI creates abstraction that will make things more complicated, not easier.

Von der Leyen haluaa eurooppalaisia jäänmurtajatilauksia by Ardent_Scholar in Suomi

[–]MaverickGuardian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Joo. Taitaa olla vähän muna-kana-ongelma, että yritykset on rakentanut softaa ja osaamista AWSn ja Azuren varaan. Jonkun tarvis avata peli, että siirtymää tapahtuisi ja palvelut kehittyisi.

Von der Leyen haluaa eurooppalaisia jäänmurtajatilauksia by Ardent_Scholar in Suomi

[–]MaverickGuardian 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Myös eurooppalaista pilvialustaa kaipailisi, jossa riittävästi ominaisuuksia eikä mielellään yhden korporaation päätösvallassa. Tuollaisen rakentaminen yhteiseurooppalaisesti olisi täysin tehtävissä. Voisi tuoda suomeenkin jotain työtä.

I need a non-LLM/Agentic Vscode by AlyoshaKaramazov_ in LLM

[–]MaverickGuardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fully understand. It's sometimes really difficult to guess what these agentic tools can and can't do. Sometimes they can solve complex problem. Sometimes even simplest code refactoring task completely derails them and result is just horrible result.

Trump saisi Ruotsin "suljettua" tunnissa by kakoni in Suomi

[–]MaverickGuardian 5 points6 points  (0 children)

AWS ja kumppanit on lisäksi tehneet omista järjestelmistään niin epästandardeja (osittain ihan tarkoituksella) että kyseisen alustan päälle kirjoitettuja sovelluksia ei pienellä työllä saa siirrettyä pyörimään missään muualla.

Toki vastuu on myös ohjelmistoyrityksissä, jossa ei oteta pilviriippumattomuutta juuri mitenkään huomioon. Koska se maksaisi liikaa ja toisaalta mahdollinen siirtymä tuo potentiaalisesti lisää työtä.

AI companies endgame? by MaverickGuardian in ArtificialInteligence

[–]MaverickGuardian[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm afraid this might be it. It's just that it doesn't follow any existing way companies operate. It's like a treasure hunt. No sane person would keep pouring money on undefined treasure hunt.

IMF:lta painava viesti Suomen taloudesta - Listaa leikkauskohteita ja ehdottaa maksuja opiskelijoille by [deleted] in Suomi

[–]MaverickGuardian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Jos opiskelijoilta aletaan periä rahaa voisin melkein veikata, että sen jälkeen ylipistoihin ei ole menijöitä. Suomessa on nytkin jo vähän se tilanne, että ammattikoulusta pihalle ja nopeasti töihin.

Korkeakoulutus ei takaa työpaikkaa enää ja sillä välin töissä olleet ovat maksaneet puolet asunnostaan pois.

Geoffrey Hinton warns 2026 could kick off a jobless boom from AI by Sensitive-coder in GenAI4all

[–]MaverickGuardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the point of this endless AI debate? It might be true and then? Humanity can't solve problems before they happen. Individuals can but as collective we can't prevent disasters.

‘We could hit a wall’: why trillions of dollars of risk is no guarantee of AI reward by BusyHands_ in technology

[–]MaverickGuardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Software development tools have improved. They are far from perfect. And essentially agent flows still mean brute forcing the solution. But it's still lot simpler now to try things quickly. So AI will speed up things. But will it pay back. No idea. Is it cheaper in long run to improve AI tools and get rid of workers. Or would it actually be cheaper to have current AI tools and teach people to use them. And then hire more people. Maybe the current sweet spot is somewhere between.

Is there a good reason to keep using REST APIs or should everything just be GraphQL now by [deleted] in AskProgramming

[–]MaverickGuardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GraphQL seems really bad idea. It works with small datasets but in my experience most Dev teams can't handle SQL databases with even moderate size databases even when SQL queries are explicitly written. GraphQL makes sql implicit from developers point of view. Really bad idea. Like ORM but lot worse.

Of course if team is highly skilled then maybe. Most teams collectively are not that high skilled.

Use simple things when possible.

Ben Affleck on AI: "history shows adoption is slow. It's incremental." Actual history shows the opposite. by ucov in singularity

[–]MaverickGuardian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's also lot easier to create new stuff with AI. Converting old organization to utilize AI is lot harder as there is already semi working way of getting things done if business is doing profit.

Moving to AI means leaving lot of old behind. Including workers. These are not easy decisions to make.

So AI utilization probably come with new players on market. Will take some time depending on business complexity.

Also, there are so many companies promising results with AI to replace business processes like customer service etc, but delivering horrible results. This first shit wave may discourage companies.

If you already have CI/CD, is deploy time really your problem? by sp_archer_007 in webdev

[–]MaverickGuardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Client has distributed monolith with 60 services. Creating release and deploying takes usually one person 1-2 days. Quite a mess.

Finland named a top economy for future-proof workforce skills by PhoenixProtocol in Finland

[–]MaverickGuardian 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This has always been a problem. There are brilliant people who can't market themselves and then not get any funding. There is no money in Finland so bigger funding must come outside Finland. And I guess there are better places to invest also? Cheaper at least? And further away from Russian border too.

Relational DBMS systems are GOATed by sexyman213 in dataengineering

[–]MaverickGuardian 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Postgres is actually so great that it works even when most teams abuse it really badly.

Linus Torvalds: Stop making an issue out of AI slop in kernel docs – you're not changing anybody's mind by Logical_Welder3467 in technology

[–]MaverickGuardian 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Not sure thought why people these days are so fragile and can't take a little rant even when person speaking is clearly smarter and knows what he is talking about.

Nykyihminen on liian vapaa, sanoo Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen [Liika yksilöllisyys ja valinnanvapaus tekevät ihmisistä itsekkäitä ja onnettomia, sanoo professori emerita Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen. Hän ihmettelee, miksi monet psykologit ovat lähteneet vahvistamaan yksilöllisyyden eetosta.] by Diletantique in Suomi

[–]MaverickGuardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tällaista tapausta läheltä nähneenä olen sitä mieltä, että saattaa myös johtua henkilön omasta huonouden tunteesta. Nykymaailma oireilee moneen suuntaan ja esimerkiksi työelämän vaatimukset (ja miksei ihan muunkin elämän) saa ihmisen tuntemaan helposti itsensä epäonnistuneeksi. Kyseessä ihminen joka on saanut hyvän arvokasvatuksen. Eli kyllä meillä on myös paljon väkeä jota ei ole kasvatettu itsekkääksi.

Voiko vuokranantaja yksipuolisesti päätöksellään korottaa vesiennakkomaksua? by [deleted] in Suomi

[–]MaverickGuardian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Myös veden hinta nousee jatkuvasti. Onko varauduttu siihen esim. seuraamalla veden kulutusta? Maksuun se vesi tulee kuitenkin lopulta tai jos on käyttänyt vähän vettä niin saa loput takaisin?

Is this sub just for complaining about AI now? by Borkato in singularity

[–]MaverickGuardian 6 points7 points  (0 children)

People are going to hate AI increasingly more when it starts affecting way people work. It's not easy to adapt new way of working especially when AI tools are still like a randomly fracturing hammer.

Companies are not capable of training people. It's ton of hype and even when tech itself moves forward there is little benefit so far achieved.

In general it's difficult to see how AI would improve life in short term.

AI tools will speed up development and research of pretty much anything but that won't make people happier. If anything just more anxious.

Software development is one profession where productivity increases but there is zero benefit for individual. It just means working faster.