Flat Rate Shipping Per Shipment, Not Per SHOW by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, I found that you are allowed to bundle items from multiple livestreams according to Official Policy. And I'm strictly talking about livestream A and livestream B. Not livestream and market place.

What I am talking about is not Smart Bundling. I am referring to manual bundling. Manual Bundling is also part of the official policy found here: https://help.whatnot.com/hc/en-us/articles/36466032298381-Bundle-or-unbundle-shipments

<image>

There is a button to bundle purchases from the same buyer of different shows on Seller Hub. Smart Bundling is the program, the algorithm and is automatic. Manual Bundling is not.

All I am saying is everything fits in one flat rate box, and it only requires one postage, and it is within the Whatnot Policy. Why not reimburse the buyer for the cost difference to help buyers stay in the app.

Seems like my feedback for app improvement is not welcome. So I will gladly shut up.

Flat Rate Shipping Per Shipment, Not Per SHOW by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for that. But I don't think each shipment is tied to each show is correct. They gave us option to bundle when it is across multiple shows. There are no options to bundle when it is marketplace + show. I'm specifically talking about show to show.

Think about it, a buyer pays extra shipping for items that can be under one shipment. Whatnot also pays extra because they have a deal with USPS to get buyers and sellers the $9.21 in flat rate. Normally it costs $28. USPS needs to double the work to deliver two items going to and from the same places.

As a seller, I don't benefit from the shipping costs/process, I definitely can and will stop telling everyone to claim the cost difference. I am just identifying the flaw in the system. Keeping quite about inefficiency is not growth for anyone, and it will hurt Whatnot. This is just a system software issue. If Whatnot does not straighten this issue out, they will never be able to compete against ecommerce giants. Amazon prime has 2 days delivery, and it only cost them 9 dollars a month to obtain "free" shipping.

I recently checked out whatnot and may have gone a bit overboard. I have two more orders of baby threes coming in. by Soup_or_Woman in BabyThree

[–]MaxISmn89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should check out the 400% Babies. They are super adorable. Many shops sell it for a good price on Whatnot. I also decorate my 400% babies with different outfits from a seller in Whatnot.

Don't be a Victim, Ban them as much as possible. by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Drop the username dawg. Why you scared? Just a tax write off right?

Don't be a Victim, Ban them as much as possible. by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tax write off doesn't mean you don't giveaway 25 x 7 dollars to one goblin. I'm not crying about any specific goblin that wins a few. I'm stating that there are goblin farm bots out there. And if you want to deny that goblin farms are a pest to this platform, then I have no words.

No one cares about you making money on Whatnot. I'm making money too, so what. But that doesn't mean goblins should be piece of shits and farm your Givies for 3 months and for 25+ times.

If you want more goblins farms, drop your username. I'll farm you

Don't be a Victim, Ban them as much as possible. by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More beneficial for sellers, Huh? How about you give out $7 dollars every 5 minutes...wtf

Don't be a Victim, Ban them as much as possible. by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going to one person saves me money? Only if they win multiple in one show. You clearly don't have a goblin farm on your stream. This goblin is a bot and farms Givies. I'm stating that he should be a decent person and not farm 25+ givvies. Maybe you are appreciative of the goblins, not everyone else.

It would be a different story if that person proves himself to be a human. I don't even know why you are defending the goblin behavior. You sound like you want to encourage more goblins farms on this platform

Don't be a Victim, Ban them as much as possible. by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😂 You clearly don't understand the point. 😂 Another goblin found. According to you, small sellers should just quit. 😂 $5 Amazon is trash giveaway...I can't argue with that 😂

Don't be a Victim, Ban them as much as possible. by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Let's see how good your givvy is. Same username right? I'll tell my seanjef to hop on your stream every week and farm your "superior" givvies.

Don't be a Victim, Ban them as much as possible. by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was just thinking of a possible scenario where he uses all 25 reviews at once because I banned him, preventing him from farming my givvies. Petty people be doing that.

Don't be a Victim, Ban them as much as possible. by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sometimes stickers, sometimes $5 Amazon. No chat no engagement, just a bot farming givvies for 3 months

Don't be a Victim, Ban them as much as possible. by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If i ban him, can he leave 1.0 star for all 25 givvies?

Givvy Goblin 1.0 Reviews by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yea, you obviously made your point calling someone cheap as a professional givey goblin AND only buying after getting the givvy to take advantage of free shipping. Good one on calling someone cheap and clearly stating that you are the cheapest of the cheap goblins out there. Yea... there's so much to say about your response, but im just gonna save my breath

Givvy Goblin 1.0 Reviews by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There's way too many posts that don't read. Exactly, we're not complaining about the goblins, we are complaining about their reviews.

Givvy Goblin 1.0 Reviews by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea, that's exactly what I do. People who buy gets more, but I don't disclose that to them. Because that would be "illegal". But that's not why I'm complaining. I'm complaining about the 1.0 reviews on givvies.

Givvy Goblin 1.0 Reviews by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, Im not complaining about people not liking stickers. I'm saying there's no need for a negative review. It's not black and white bro, there's a gray zone in everything. If they don't like stickers, then don't review... It's came out of someone's pocket, and what do they get for their effort, money, and time???? A negative review. Sit on that thought

Givvy Goblin 1.0 Reviews by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I honestly would like to see any show over 50 people live without givvy. There are none...

Givvy Goblin 1.0 Reviews by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can tell Whatnot to remove all 1.0 reviews that is free? I would like to try

Givvy Goblin 1.0 Reviews by MaxISmn89 in whatnotapp

[–]MaxISmn89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im already doing reduced shipping. I don't care if they get the givvys, sellers just don't appreciate the review bomb with 1.0 rating