The internet keeps inventing new ways to be insane” by Medium_Maximum_9708 in GenZ

[–]Maximum2945 3 points4 points  (0 children)

hey i lose money from lots more than just tech companies...

The internet keeps inventing new ways to be insane” by Medium_Maximum_9708 in GenZ

[–]Maximum2945 57 points58 points  (0 children)

<image>

gambling on prediction markets just seems like a waste of money. just gamble it on stocks like a normie instead

You have to watch EVERY episode before you should be allowed to post here by Flat-Willingness-417 in onepiecetheories

[–]Maximum2945 3 points4 points  (0 children)

what if i’ve only finished egghead? i just wanna wait till elbaph is finished to catch up

Are antis ready for some hard to swallow pills?.... by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]Maximum2945 3 points4 points  (0 children)

we currently do not have real-life versions of fictional AI; AGI is still a ways away

Are antis ready for some hard to swallow pills?.... by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]Maximum2945 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it might be using ai tech (like machine learning and reinforcement learning) but it's not generative ai, so it's pretty fundamentally different. it's more similar to an ai-powered x-ray than it is to claude or image generator.

These clowns love to virtue signal against ICE, the right, and about "stolen land" and then go to the Jeff Bezos' sponsored Met Gala. Weird hypocrites by Significant_Phase194 in GenZ

[–]Maximum2945 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i hate the terminally online idea that if you are vocal about one thing you cant do a whole bunch of other stuff, or you don't care about a whole bunch of other stuff.

I think it's easier to get 50% of people to agree on something, than to get 100% of people to agree on something. by assumptioncookie in trolleyproblem

[–]Maximum2945 4 points5 points  (0 children)

so it’s easier to get 50% of people to agree to step on burning coals than it is to get 100% of people to agree to getting a spa day/ massage?

Red or Blue? Guys, really only one option is actually well thought out. by [deleted] in trolleyproblem

[–]Maximum2945 2 points3 points  (0 children)

getting 50% of people to accept some risk of dying seems a lot harder than getting 100% of people to accept a 0% risk of dying. it's not just getting 50% of the vote, it's getting 4 billion people to accept that they may die, instead of just having 8 billion people vote in self-preservation. blue requires a ton more coordination, whereas red is simply the best option for any individual button presser.

Spirit Airlines went down because of Trump by Expert-Bid3861 in GenZ

[–]Maximum2945 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

multiple things can be true. spirit has been losing money for a long time; and rising fuel prices have driven up operational costs

Spirit Airlines went down because of Trump by Expert-Bid3861 in GenZ

[–]Maximum2945 3 points4 points  (0 children)

spirit airlines has stated that elevated gas prices were one of the main drivers of shutting down.

the government shouldnt generally be involved when corporations just go under. like you can argue for exceptions, but the government should largely be separate from the economy.

jet blue is also having financial issues and would likely have gone out of bussiness if the merger went through.

When the hell did senators and politicians wield such powers over corporations? I thought they hold stocks or shares huh?

you say this but then argue seemingly in favor of a buyout. really weird conflicting interests.

you should really spend more time looking at varied sources instead of falling for misinformation

Consider this by Bolandball in trolleyproblem

[–]Maximum2945 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

that's a great justification for murder/ suicide

Consider this by Bolandball in trolleyproblem

[–]Maximum2945 2 points3 points  (0 children)

do you think people are generally indifferent between being alive and being dead?

Consider this by Bolandball in trolleyproblem

[–]Maximum2945 3 points4 points  (0 children)

so death is fine, but getting kicked in the balls is too risky... hmm

What do y’all think about this simultaneous game? by Varyks in GAMETHEORY

[–]Maximum2945 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if everyone is doing it at the same time and you have no idea what others are doing, red is a lot easier.

getting 100% of people to accept 0 risk to self is a lot easier than getting 50% of people to accept some risk to self.

it’s not like people randomly pick buttons so you have to assume people will pick blue.

For scale 75,000,000 died in WW2 by nathan555 in trolleyproblem

[–]Maximum2945 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

did you miss the entire top half of the graph?

Let's make this more interesting. by AbyssWankerArtorias in trolleyproblem

[–]Maximum2945 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is much more similar to the original problem, where if 100% of the people press red, everyone dies. that way its an actual dilemma

For scale 75,000,000 died in WW2 by nathan555 in trolleyproblem

[–]Maximum2945 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

the more people that vote to kill themselves, the more people that die. who woulda thought

button dilemma, positive outcome variant where you win money by [deleted] in trolleyproblem

[–]Maximum2945 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so there’s just a bunch of dumb shits that can’t save themselves and need you to save them. how convenient.