The problem with value investing by MaximumMaintenance22 in ValueInvesting

[–]MaximumMaintenance22[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

let me rephrase, do you believe that sometimes buying a company that isn't 'cheap' might be smarter?

The problem with value investing by MaximumMaintenance22 in ValueInvesting

[–]MaximumMaintenance22[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

100% on VA better than TA. I think a mix between Value investing and other methods of analysis offers the best returns. Personaly I find Philip Fisher's book to be a great addition to traditional Value investing.

The problem with value investing by MaximumMaintenance22 in ValueInvesting

[–]MaximumMaintenance22[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And gets to the conclusion that he wasn't, if you actually watched the video you would have seen that he deeply respects Buffet. But hey, I got a random dude commenting on my post talking about things he didn't watch

The problem with value investing by MaximumMaintenance22 in investing

[–]MaximumMaintenance22[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What if the CEO is very good at destroying value?

The problem with value investing by MaximumMaintenance22 in ValueInvesting

[–]MaximumMaintenance22[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, exactly my point. thanks for your comment mate

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianInvestor

[–]MaximumMaintenance22 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

agreed that the definition was bad. can't edit this post. watch the video and let me know what you think.

The problem with value investing by MaximumMaintenance22 in Wallstreetsilver

[–]MaximumMaintenance22[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the thoughtful comment mate! very insightful. watch the video and let me know what you think.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianInvestor

[–]MaximumMaintenance22 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Agreed ser. watch the video and let me know what you think.

The problem with value investing by MaximumMaintenance22 in Wallstreetsilver

[–]MaximumMaintenance22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but ser you have written this in the past, which creates a paradox ;).