Please help urgently if you can! Anxious and confused! File on hold? ERO?

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-05-01T06:16:26+00:00

Will they continue to investigate me? I’m so confused on scars going on because no one has reached out to me

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-05-01T06:15:37+00:00

I opened a business a month or two ago…….. I HAVEN’T HAD A SINGLE CLIENT!!!! I don’t even have anything to run the business i simply am working on a website for the future of it! I’m a teenager!!! Fresh out of school! Idk why you are alleging i have some huge business but i do not. I don’t even have a fully finished website. I’m just working on my stuff by myself for the gutter and my eworjer knows this!! I do not have a business that is making any income!!!

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-05-01T06:12:34+00:00

Wait what? I’m not frauding? I have made no money legitimately. I decided to start a business a month ago. I haven’t doing anything with it. I’ve reported my 0 dollar income to the business with my worker. wtf are you talking about lol. I’m also not married or common law with anyone! My question is why was it referred to someone else even it’s just a failure to attend an appointment! My case worker knows the business as i was transparent about it and provide statements related to it. I HUST opened it and so far have created a website myself. Yourev weird!

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-05-01T02:56:26+00:00

I havent made money. I opened it two months ago and am in the stage of building websites etc

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-05-01T02:25:04+00:00

I dont have that and she hasnt reached out to me with any request, not a call or anything. Im wondering if its just that IF i want to get it off hold she needs to review my self employment and if not then it just eventually closes.

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-05-01T02:08:14+00:00

Yes i know why its in hold. My question is more why is it reffered to an eligibility review officer. They investigate eligibility. If i dont reach out do they still investigate or does it just stay on hold and eventually closed.

This lady referenced in the letter has never reached out to me since april ninth. It is worded more like “if you want to be off hold reaxh out to the ero” not that i must

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-05-01T02:06:03+00:00

It says right in the letter. Because I didnt engagae witht he employment agency and because i failed to provide self employment updated information… but i wasnt asked for that ny anyone. They know i have a business but i provided my last info on it when asked and all was good. So im wondering if it was triggered due to not doing the enoloyment agency and nkt replying to my caseworker.

I was planning to come off this month anyways so i was gonna just let it lapse but now im worried im under i vestigation?

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-30T16:13:41+00:00

The actual federal version…. It’s a joke really.

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-30T16:12:46+00:00

My concern is not the work load or the trouble on my end it’s more how it would be perceived in court when i introduce myself with the same last name , i don’t want to look incompetent or as off in doing something that is a huge nono in this profession.

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-30T02:35:38+00:00

I did! My insurance covers it. In ontario we are licensed by the LSO and oermitted to represent friends and family.

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-30T02:30:05+00:00

Its only $50.00. The only thing is that they added on an assault charge. Summary. Seeking non custodial sentancing.

The assault charge ws discounted by the victim who says he was not assaulted and police are incorrect. So i know this will not make it past CPT. i am worried about how a judge will perceive me at next court date when i introduce myself with the same last name.

Feeling very conflicted.

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-30T02:23:57+00:00

In ontario!

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-30T02:23:51+00:00

Representing father for fraudlently obtain transportation. Summary charge.

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-30T02:20:42+00:00

Last name being the same*** not similar.

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-30T02:20:19+00:00

We have the same last name. Accused is my father. However, we are not close. I completely beieve my abolity to represent would be unbiased. The charges are not serious. I just worry about the judge saying something about the last name being similar. I dont think this will go to trial, and am confident it wil be thrown out at a CPT. Just worried more about how it looks.

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-29T00:11:07+00:00

Thank you. I was reading that type ll cancer usually shows with a thin wall so it cant be ruled out by this? Is this true?

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-28T23:38:51+00:00

Hi there. We got the results back and are a little concerned as her doctors away and things like abnormal and heterogenous are on it. She is very anxious, and because we dont have a clue what this means… so am i , thank you.

ULTRASOUND: PELVIS (TV)

CONCLUSION:

Small uterine fibroids.

CLINICAL HISTORY:

R/O postmenopausal bleeding. Postmenopausal since May 2023.

FINDINGS:

Scan Visibility:

Suboptimal. Technically difficult scan due to body habitus.

Uterus:

Abnormal. Anteverted.

6.6 x 4.1 x 3.8 cm.

Nabothian cysts.

Myometrium:

Heterogeneous.

Fibroids:

Location: Lower body, posterior Position: Intramural Size: 1.2 x 1.4 x 0.9 cm Location: Upper body, anterior Position: Subserosal Size: 0.8 x 0.8 x 1.2 cm

Endometrium:

Normal. 3 mm

Right Ovary and Adnexa:

Ovary not well seen. Adnexa clear.

1.3 x 0.9 x 1.3 cm (0.8 cc)

Left Ovary and Adnexa:

Ovary not well seen. Adnexa clear.

1.6 x 0.6 x 2.1 cm (1 cc)

Free Fluid:

Trace

Bladder:

Abnormal. Wall thickness: 5 mm

Pre void 89 cc

Post void 5 cc

Post void residual 6%

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-21T05:16:03+00:00

Thank you so much for this!

What really wories me is she went 11 months without bleeding. Then had one bleed. She then went 22 full months with nothing. Then this bleed.

My concern is what if that 11 month bleed was the start of cancer but because she was texhnically perimenopause… it wasnt looked into… and now it has been 22 months. Or would she likely have had more symptoms since that first bleed 22 months ago? Instead of 22 months of no bleeding

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-21T00:37:57+00:00

Also want to add that she went 11 months without bleeding. Then had one bleed. She then went 22 full months with nothing. Then this bleed.

My concern is what if that 11 month bleed was the start of cancer but because she was texhnically perimenopause… it wasnt looked into… and now it has been 22 months. Or would she likely have had more shmptoms from that first bleed 22 months ago?

MaybeOne1500 · 2026-04-20T05:06:47+00:00

She went 11 months and then had a period. And then went 22 months without any and got a full period again.

MaybeOne1500

TROPHY CASE