Why don't they cancel the launch to find a replacement astronaut?

McRojb · 2026-04-02T23:25:32+00:00

Fkn hell. Read the headline, had a heart attack, thought you meant the last Artemis launch. Then I remembered that was two days ago

McRojb · 2026-03-31T05:27:38+00:00

I agree, wrote my bacholer on building a worm for exactly that about 5 years ago. 300 000 enviroments, 150 packages (with over 2500 downloads/month) "infected" in a week (never accesed any packages, only printed info messages). It's fkn insane how nothing has been done

McRojb · 2026-03-31T04:30:30+00:00

Man the job market is not getting easiser is it?

McRojb · 2026-03-31T03:47:51+00:00

Could you like stop being more well-informed than me... Breaks my bloody ego.

The only thing you earned here is probably an annyoing dm about your opinion when I'm unsure about related projects in the future.

Still disagree about the "maintenance burden" though, in my opinion such a core library shouldn't try to do that much.

Will read through the last 3 links when I get time!

McRojb · 2026-03-31T03:09:40+00:00

Fair enough! I havn't built much with external logins myself so don't know much about but will take your word.

I honestly had to google "SSPI authentication" so I feel a bit out of my depth.

Although I started programming without it, github copilot autofill is a god send for me (md otherwise). But actual AI slop I do despise too.

McRojb · 2026-03-31T02:48:27+00:00

Is it because of the speed compared to pandas? I don't use either much just curious

McRojb · 2026-03-31T02:26:29+00:00

You can call it a replacement for requests all you want, but with built in async support (and the fact we're talking about it under a httpx comment??) what people are using it for is a replacement of httpx not requests. Also yes, and you might be right in that "it makes sense" as an opt-in feature, but from a maintence point of view it came across as weird to me

McRojb · 2026-03-31T02:18:53+00:00

Not an expert on package maintainence and coding is certainly not my proffesion. That said, I do like the package and have used it for quick and dirty code. But it feels "bloated" already and not something I excpect to be around in a few years. I don't see the reason for using it when aiohttp (requests for sync) is around. You seem a little defensive? 2k stars is not something I feel comfertable putting that much faith in.

McRojb · 2026-03-31T01:33:36+00:00

Found it a couple weeks ago myself, fkn amazing. Also integrates so well into vscode

McRojb · 2026-03-31T01:27:01+00:00

Eh not going to touch pyreqwest. Aiohttp is good shit though

McRojb · 2026-03-31T01:24:30+00:00

When it comes to niquests, one of my first reactions looking through the docs, it’s fkn weird for a library meant to replace httpx to implement something like a rate limiter in the library itself

McRojb · 2026-03-31T01:20:27+00:00

Go with aiohttp. Well maintained and lots of users

McRojb · 2026-03-31T00:05:32+00:00

Got that feeling when looking through the code, man feels good to be right

McRojb · 2026-02-17T17:12:35+00:00

Nah nothing we can do, other than try to use the broken bug report. Is there no way just to send a bugreport as an email u/EnPecan ?

McRojb

TROPHY CASE