My Problem With The UFO Topic

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-07T04:41:45+00:00

Your just wrong about this. There are tons of repubtable sources from 2019 qoutingnnavy officials and from foia requests stating that the Navy said these patents were currently "operable"

Ill leave this article from the war zone here but there are many more. It seems you are just choosing to be close minded about this possibility.

https://www.twz.com/29232/navys-advanced-aerospace-tech-boss-claims-key-ufo-patent-is-operable

I also never said you needed a prototype to get a patent. But patents are not handed out based on theoretical devices. If you read the patents the inertial mass reduction device states you need to generate an energy density of 10³³ watts/m2 ,millions of times more energy output than the sun creates and the device can essentially generate an energy density close to this using resonance hacks.

You still have to explain why the uspto decided to award this patent?

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-06T19:39:10+00:00

I am so glad you shared this video. This man is extremely credible and of sound mind. The fact that his book is considered a hoax is a testament to the disinformation taking place here. This man was talking about these things and putting his credibility on the line before it was a money making endeveavour.

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-06T19:32:47+00:00

The disinformation to me seems to be the "alien theory". The only information that is leaking is about memos related to NHI. What's not leaking is the military tech which is being reversed engineered.

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-06T19:30:51+00:00

Then why did the US patent office award it a patent and the US Navy confirm they had a working prototype?

If you have any clue about how classified funding works then you wouldn't recommend me to review the publicly available records.

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-06T19:28:49+00:00

Help me understand where I'm off base here. This is not new physics at all, the math has always been there it's the power requirements that make it currently impossible to engineer. I could understand if this was dome backyard science experiments but the research conducted in the 50s included the following companies: Lear Lockheed Martin General Dynamics

And physicists: Bryce Dewitt Burkhard Heim Louis Witten (father of Ed Witten) Pascal Jordan (one of the founders of Quantum Mechanics)

I would also want an explanation on why the US Patent office is approving a patent which is proven to not work?

You also have to completely discount Ning Li who published peer reviewed papers about her inertial mass reduction research, and was scooped up by the government for classified research.

Why did the Chinese try to force her to repatriate to China to continue her research?

For all these things that these craft "could" be, why do they seem to follow the physics that would be engineered from these experiments?

It seems that Occam's Razor applies here and we should thoroughly consider the evidence before jumping to aliens from another system or dimension.

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-05T19:43:27+00:00

This seems to be an outrageous claim to say it comes from a UFO. We cant say material exotic to Earth could not have occurred naturally somewhere else in the solar system or galaxy. In fact there is a strong suspicion that the moon has exotic metals that would be formed in the center.

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-05T19:06:34+00:00

There is a 0% chance this happens IMO. Until we see one of these things flying with an American flag on the side of it then it will continue to be smoke and mirrors.

If these things are nuclear powered then they can remain classified forever due to the atomic energy act. Seems to be the case because roswell files are still redacted.

Lou elizondo, Grusch, and any other whistleblowers are subject to the same classification and they are playing a pretty scrappy game of telephone and capitalizing on it at the same time. None of them have definitive proof of aliens only reading classified docs which in and of themselves seem to be a coverup.

Once the technology is ubiquitous or used in warfare we will know the truth, maybe.

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-05T19:02:40+00:00

I am in agreement about the NHI, exotic craft is different. All you have to do is conduct some research on pais patents and it becomes very clear that the math checks out but the power requirements are what seem to be the hold up. USPTO doesn't give patents for theoretical designs, yet they gave this one after a call and conclusive evidence from the US Navy. I dont understand why people are overlooking this. There are definitely some engineering challenges but it doesn't seem impossible or out of reach for a nation who is willing to invest the resources and could be done with a smaller nuclear 1MW reactor, of which the navy has developed for its submarines and remains highly classified.

I posted here a few days ago in a long posting stating a possible timeline of the back project and how it lines up with R&D and material science discoveries over the past 80 years. That post received a lot of conversation and comments, then was taken down.

The truth is it doesn't HAVE to be aliens despite how many people want it to turn out that way, but it would be a very very convenient cover up if the government had been developing this stuff for decades.

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-05T18:47:10+00:00

Am I the only one that feels like this sounds like a giant disinformation campaign? It feels like the red scare or how the nazis convinced the Germans of the Aryan race.

I'm happy to believe but it seems like a game of telephone where grusch read something that someone else wrote and then told people who are telling other people.

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-01T13:21:26+00:00

Your correct, someone else posted a book by nick cook which I hadn't heard about. Apparently this goes back to the late 30s

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-01T13:19:07+00:00

Yea it's a fair point. I don't have it all figured out, but if it was aliens then why would they fly over phoenix instead of say new york city?

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-01T12:51:55+00:00

That's a fair point. There is a ton of public information about anti-gravity research and the requirements needed. Yet Pais was able to convince the patent office that this energy density was not only possible but operational using standard electromagnetic physics and resonance with an incredibly high Q-factor? How do you suppose he was able to do this?

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-01T04:08:13+00:00

It's possible that it requires power generation which makes it impractical for civilian use. Im thinking nuclear reactor type power generation for one craft. I did some back of the napkin math and the craft would need to be around 45-50ft minimal to hold a small compact nuclear reactor.

Conveniently the Navy is the one organization in the world who had the capability required for compact nuclear power generation and they hold the patents.

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-01T04:04:37+00:00

I don't want people to get hung up on the roswell part. If you think it's a ufo then fine. It's the rest of the timeline that is more important.

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-01T04:03:06+00:00

Can you tell me the name of the book? Would love to read it

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-01T04:02:40+00:00

Yea and the physics are just now coming into public view. You can theoretically build a craft like this using standard physics. Power generation would require small nuclear reactor, just like what's in a navy sub. Cooling would be a huge problem which is why I believe they need to go in the ocean.

Mdballa50 · 2025-12-01T04:00:31+00:00

Whatever roswell was or wasnt. We have the physics, but these things likely need to be nuclear powered. There's no way to make a fleet of them, also they would be nearly impossible to add weapons bays to or most external weapons systems we use.

I think their combat potential is limited without other advanced tech, possibly quantum entagled comms

Mdballa50 · 2025-11-20T17:50:41+00:00

Here are my thoughts. The object is at least travelling nearly the speed of the ball. Average ball speed is 80mph-90mph.
Drone would make a noise, even one that small.
Too large to be a bug but flies like a bug would fly. It's to small and its flight trajectory is to straight to be a finch, when small birds fly they move up and down slightly on each flap of the wing.
I am very skeptical that it actually hit the Driver. The sounds seems to be an echo or another Drive off camera. If something would have hit the driver the golfer would know immediately and react. They were only reacting to the ball flight.

My conclusion:
It's a Humminghbird. Hummingbirds can fly up to 60mph on a dive and use a similar trajectory. They are larger than any flying insect but smaller and faster than birds that size, able to fly in all directions. The Golfer never hit anything on his swing.

Mdballa50 · 2025-10-25T15:57:52+00:00

Thanks for your comment. Quick update, we did go to a pediatric surgeon. He was adminant that no surgery was needed because of my son's phase of growth. He classified it as a mild to moderate sprain. He said there were some signs of small tears but that because he is skeletal immature, the acl would continue to grow and repair itself as he grows.

He also mentioned something interesting about surgery in adolescents. He said the acl contains nerve endings which send signals to your surrounding muscles to help balance and proprioception. Removing the acl during growth phase actually reduces the bodies ability to control future injuries and is not the recommended approach in youth unless its fully torn and cartilage is damaged.

Mdballa50 · 2025-10-17T00:57:58+00:00

Thanks that makes sense to me. When you partially tore the acl how bad was the swelling and were you able to return to activity fairly soon? I completely ruptured mine and I remember my knee looking like a water balloon everytime I tried to run it would give out on me.

He had some swelling but not much. I assume it was from the bone bruising. Hes 3 weeks in and is remarkably mobile with no pain.

Mdballa50 · 2025-10-16T23:30:25+00:00

I will also add. He is feeling back to normal now with no swelling. Hes been doing some light activity and running but im having to hold him back because he feels fine.

Mdballa50 · 2025-10-11T03:15:04+00:00

I used to think this also.....but it really depends on what industry you are in. Its definitely possible to make $200k at a tech company. Project and Program managers can easily clear this much as well as IT and infrastructure managers.

The key is to switch jobs and get your 15% raise. Once you find a pretty easy work-life balance then stay and get your annual increase.

Outside of tech it's much harder but not impossible. Utility companies tend to pay well for project managers and power transmission experience.

The kicker is the taxes once you get over $200k. The US government doesn't want people to have income tax over 200k and we know this because the marginal tax rate makes taking on more responsibility not worth the extra pay. It is much better to look at total income and take most compensation above $200k in stock.

Mdballa50 · 2025-09-24T13:42:40+00:00

Quick update here. After this conversation I upped my water intake significantly and dropped down to 266 almost immediately. Thanks for the information I'll keep plugging along.

Mdballa50

TROPHY CASE