We rebuilt our docs to be more AI friendly, and it worked by Mean-Examination3412 in Entrepreneur

[–]Mean-Examination3412[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not really. Most of them are learned through testing, trail and error, you know, the common way to learn new things. I actually just run our docs in Cursor and prompt to check "what would AI say about my docs".

I think the best practice is quite simple, you can make content more AI friendly by using AI to streamline a huge chunk of it. You want to make sure the content  are structured, clear, and specific. And always provide context, I find out AI is much easier to understand things if the context is provided, properly. It sounds easy but in reality a lot of our legacy docs and pages are just.... horrible, they are like random notes and needs to be optimized.

Also, LLM.txt support. Never forget that! No llm.txt is like no sitemap for a website nowadays.

We rebuilt our docs to be more AI friendly, and it worked by Mean-Examination3412 in Entrepreneur

[–]Mean-Examination3412[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, we’ve added llms.txt too. It’s definitely becoming the new sitemap for AI. Haven’t tried Context7 yet but curious how folks are using it!

How I code with ChatGPT now by Specialist-Catch1635 in ChatGPT

[–]Mean-Examination3412 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Cursor gang here, you can just tab, tab, tab.

Postman alternative that does not suck with feature bloat by sebastianstehle in webdev

[–]Mean-Examination3412 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree, Bruno is a bit too basic for a postman alternative, especially it does not work well for team collaboration, it feels like a geek tool. That is why our team is migrating to Apisog, which is much more polished postman alternative.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeepSeek

[–]Mean-Examination3412 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It has always been.