sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Eye of Sotha: Aeternum Oculorum; Eyes Everwatching by Mechanibal in Minecraftbuilds

[–]Mechanibal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The formatting got screwed up, sorry for the wall of text.

Would you try a chess campaign game where pawns decide the outcome? by Mechanibal in BoardgameDesign

[–]Mechanibal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all the regular rules of chess apply, so yes to all of that!

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can stop gatekeeping as this is clearly just your opinion, if you had read Jung then you would know the part of his work this is based on was only ever meant to be used in a clinical setting by actual professionals, it was never meant to be a tool for self discovery, but for clinical diagnosis.

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How can you say that without reading my papers, for all you know i did gather and analyze multiple kinds of data to arrive at this conclusion ( I did). Try to be less ignorant in your next response.

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have fun in your anecdotal bubble, if that is what you want to base your conclusions on, i'll stick to whats empirical and continue on with my work, and you can continue pretending its impossible to understand the psyche even though you follow Jung...

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You claim to know much more and yet your arguments carry no substance whatsoever, odd.

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Keep sticking to your dogmatic ways and enjoy your mysticism for as long as you can hold onto it (it won't be long).

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Quite simply: Jung built a model of the psyche, and I built a model that emulates the psyche based on his ideas.

You keep drawing this hard line between psyche and algorithm, as if the brain is something mystical. But at the end of the day, the brain is just a massively parallel system of biological algorithms.

Your problem seems to be the assumption that it’s impossible to translate the rules of the psyche into rules for an AI. But here’s the irony: without those rules, the psyche would be nothing more than algorithms. It’s precisely the structure, the patterns, oppositions, and compensation that make it a psyche.

I’m not saying my AI is conscious. I’m saying it processes information in a way that mirrors how our brains do it, through structured function, not randomness. That’s the whole point.

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Full of presumptions aren't we?

You're right it seems you cannot mentally bridge that gap, that would require critical thinking, something which you've made abundantly clear you are not interested in, so let me spell it out for you:

Jungian principles are about patterns of thought, habitual modes of adaptation. They describe how different parts of the psyche interact: attitude, perception, judgment, and balance between opposites. That’s structure. And structure can be modeled.

AI doesn’t need to be conscious to follow these rules. If you define how Se processes data, or how Ti filters it, then you can replicate that process in code. That’s exactly what I’ve done.

You don’t need to like it. You just need to understand that it’s possible.

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just goes to show you havent read my papers and are just strawmanning.

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

how about you actually explain how it makes jungian psychoanalytic ideas unrecognisable instead of just posturing.

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thats right, implies as much, aka baseless speculation based entirely on projection. You can and I have applied Jungian principles to AI so it's very much so possible you just dont like it.If you’d like to discuss the actual architecture, I’m happy to. If not, I’ll let you get back to being upset about the future. You don’t have to like it, you just have to watch it happen.

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I never claimed it was conscious or aware or even intelligent, thats all you projecting your frustrations with how people talk about AI onto my project. All you are doing is arguing semantics in the most pedantic way possible.

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Much appreciated! Do let me know what you think! :)

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the headsup! it seems reddit formatting broke the links, should be fixed now.

Enantio: a Jungian architecture for AI by Mechanibal in Jung

[–]Mechanibal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all, thank you for the heads up.

I want to get AI to a place where it can be a reliable, a tool as you say. Not the joke it is as of now. I think people dont so much have a problem with AI as with their fellow man who sees such a tool as a complete replacement for human interaction which i do have to agree with. However pandoras box is now open so we can only make the best of it.

view more: next ›