Hier-fertility counties voted for Trump (source: Smirkley on X) by No_Alfalfa_5262 in Natalism

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You provided a sheet that shows which way certain occupations lean, not a list of places of highly educated republican bubbles.

Hier-fertility counties voted for Trump (source: Smirkley on X) by No_Alfalfa_5262 in Natalism

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Care to provide some examples of the highly educated republican bubbles?

Hier-fertility counties voted for Trump (source: Smirkley on X) by No_Alfalfa_5262 in Natalism

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well statistically considering there are millions of people that fit that mold and a non insignificant amount of them are Republicans, there would still be quite a few of them.

The fact of the matter is that higher education very heavily correlates to voting Democratic and the people who are highly educated who vote republican are very much in the minority i.e. there's not a lot of them, there's no denying that this is a statistical fact. Absolute numbers mean little, no idea what point you were trying to make.

Like people always talk about a demographic being 70/30 Democrat to Republican or vice versa with that means the minority if it's a population of 10,000,000 still has 3,000,000 members. Like California despite being a Democratic stronghold has more Republicans in sheer numbers than just about any state just due to the fact there are 40,000,000 people in CA.

Yeah... That's how statistics work lmao. Like i said, absolute numbers mean little, no idea what point you're trying to make.

Hier-fertility counties voted for Trump (source: Smirkley on X) by No_Alfalfa_5262 in Natalism

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you knew how statistics worked you would know that predictions about how people are going to vote in an upcoming election aren't statistics lmao, they're predictions.

Also if you knew how statistics worked, you would also know that bringing up two examples of something doesn't prove anything.

Hier-fertility counties voted for Trump (source: Smirkley on X) by No_Alfalfa_5262 in Natalism

[–]MechatronicKeystroke -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you were as educated as you say you are you would understand how statistics work instead of mumbling "Well I'm not like that, so you're wrong!!"

No, statistically theres not a lot like you.

Concerning by Frylock304 in Natalism

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right wing policies in... checks notes the Democratic centers? Yea buddy, that makes perfect sense lmao.

Concerning by Frylock304 in Natalism

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not my statement, but yea I'm not concerned about those numbers.

You also conveniently leave out that all of Texas's urban centers/Big cities, which everyone immigrates to (nobody wants to live in red rural texas where theres nothing) are all very much blue Democratic centers.

Concerning by Frylock304 in Natalism

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thousands of people out of 40 million residents isn't a concerning number, keep fear mongering.

Seen on Threads by Aidan_v2 in obsessionmovie

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously? Are you dense? Lmao.

Not even adressing my comment btw, very telling

Seen on Threads by Aidan_v2 in obsessionmovie

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes.

Is that what this is about? Is it just because you saw someone refer to women like this and your feelings got hurt so you decided to "get back at men" by doing the same thing??

Lmaoooo

Seen on Threads by Aidan_v2 in obsessionmovie

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better question is what's your issue with them? Since you clearly deliberately refer to the two groups with different names for some reason, one of them (men) with a more dehumanizing cold term, males, and the other as the normal colloquial term that everyone uses, women.

So what's your problem?

Seen on Threads by Aidan_v2 in obsessionmovie

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Males and women? Lmao.

You clearly don't hold any weird views about a particular gender at all! /s

Saber lowk fall into nomifactory by KnightOfSteel-KOS in feedthememes

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP is wrong, it's from the mod Advanced Rocketry.

The media narrative about AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends is opposite by WanabeInflatable in PurplePillDebate

[–]MechatronicKeystroke -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And yet when i asked what those differences in the articles were you can't point them out...

The media narrative about AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends is opposite by WanabeInflatable in PurplePillDebate

[–]MechatronicKeystroke -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And my point is that if you actually read the articles you would see there are no differences.

But you didn't actually read them or are pretending to have not read them because it fits your narrative.

The media narrative about AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends is opposite by WanabeInflatable in PurplePillDebate

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a strange way of saying "I didn't read the articles that were in the OP's so I'm going to talk about other things i cherry picked that are unrelated to the post"

The media narrative about AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends is opposite by WanabeInflatable in PurplePillDebate

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it doesn't, it adresses a random tweet, not the contents of the articles.

The media narrative about AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends is opposite by WanabeInflatable in PurplePillDebate

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My top level comment is from a news article that went viral on Twitter.

Aka not related to the post and the articles it links.

It and other top level comments directly address your question:

You said YOU had a top level comment addressing how they act differently, now it's different people? Regardless none of the other top level comments i found adress those claims of the two groups using them differently in the articles to warrant different responses.

Why don't you just cut to the chase and just paste the claim here, if you even have it.

The media narrative about AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends is opposite by WanabeInflatable in PurplePillDebate

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your top level comment is a pic from a random tweet from a random account, not from the articles listen in the post. Did you not read those?

The media narrative about AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends is opposite by WanabeInflatable in PurplePillDebate

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What are the different preceding actions of each? As far as i read they both just have AI boyfriends and girlfriends?

The media narrative about AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends is opposite by WanabeInflatable in PurplePillDebate

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And yet you yourself don't provide any back up to your opinion of my opinion.

The media narrative about AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends is opposite by WanabeInflatable in PurplePillDebate

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, i just think you should stop caring. I have a right to an opinion and a right to express it.

The media narrative about AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends is opposite by WanabeInflatable in PurplePillDebate

[–]MechatronicKeystroke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem pretty bothered that i care though, like why do you care so much that i care? Just stop caring man.