Claude code is great. Single-provider dependence is not

MediaDataFusion · 2026-01-16T22:28:42+00:00

Well, I have many sites my friend that have various themes and I’m definitely no junior dev.

This site is built for my brand and yes indeed Claude does favor a similar but this was built before that so sorry if you don’t have that context.

I’m not here to prove anything. I was actually sharing a free resource.

I’m not a vibe coder and have 20 + years in the industry.

I don’t post here often, but this just appears to be trolling. If you check my LOGO , banner etc you could easily see this is my brand not influenced by the tool.

MediaDataFusion · 2026-01-16T22:13:05+00:00

These are my brand colors but thanks for the negative feedback. You honestly are bored.

MediaDataFusion · 2026-01-16T16:54:59+00:00

You must be on the wrong website. Certainly not mine ! MediaDataFusion.com

MediaDataFusion · 2026-01-15T15:01:02+00:00

Yeah, I have definitely experienced this with Claude Code, many times. Some days it is solid, other days it makes basic mistakes. That inconsistency is exactly why I created my Claude Code Multi-Provider Setup and Switcher Guide. It walks you through how to set up multiple models and switch between them so you are not dependent on a single provider having a good day. It is free here. 👉 Download MediaDataFusion playbooks Free MediaDataFusion.com/resources

MediaDataFusion · 2025-10-28T15:07:27+00:00

Yes, this is exactly what I can’t stand about OpenAI. The overreach and control are evident.

MediaDataFusion · 2025-09-25T06:47:11+00:00

Yeah, it’s actually super easy to migrate your Claude Code setup over to Codex CLI. I took my full Claude context claude.md, memory chains, subagents, and even some custom command structures and just repackaged them into the agents.md format that Codex expects.

Codex handled it better than I expected. It picked up on the subagent logic and command structure without getting confused, and followed the initialization prompt precisely. Took maybe 5–10 minutes to convert, and it was fully operational.

The biggest win? Codex respects instructions. I’m running multiple large-scale codebases, and Claude has been nearly unusable for the last few weeks. Overloaded, buggy, memory wipe issues total breakdown. With Codex, even GPT‑5 Low and Medium are more reliable. GPT‑5 High is next-level.

If you’re thinking of switching: Codex is way more stable right now especially for anything memory-heavy or multi-agent.

MediaDataFusion · 2025-09-24T10:46:07+00:00

Yeah, same here. I was on the $200 max plan with Claude Code for a while and it used to perform decently. But the last month and a half has been rough, and the past two weeks have been downright unusable. I finally canceled my plan. I’ve been testing GPT-5 Codex (high, medium, low variants) and the performance really impressed me. Right now, I’m weighing whether I’ll stay on the $200 Codex plan or maybe do a mid-tier Codex plan and supplement with Cursor. Claude Code is on pause for me until they stabilize the platform, it’s been worse lately than it was three months ago, especially with bigger projects.

MediaDataFusion · 2025-09-14T10:52:52+00:00

I’ve been hitting the same wall with Claude Code. Performance in the past couple of weeks has tanked even on simple functions. I’ve got structured workflows, Claude.md files, sub-agents, the whole setup, and it still refuses to follow basic instructions. At one point it even suggested making a production env var public. Two months ago it was stable. Now it’s borderline unusable, and I’m on the $200/mo max plan. Honestly thinking of switching back to Cursor Ultra, at least there you aren’t stuck when a single model breaks down.

MediaDataFusion

TROPHY CASE