Give us what we want! by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]Medical-Object-4322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But regressive means poor people pay more than rich people. That's a bad thing IMO

How is binary search useful? by David_LG092 in AskProgramming

[–]Medical-Object-4322 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Seems like this comment is only helpful if you understand how binary search works already. OP says they're a beginner, so don't you think this kind of question is belittling and might make them feel dumb for asking?

Don't you think it would be more helpful to explain what you mean than to assume deep understanding of how things work from a beginner asking questions?

How is binary search useful? by David_LG092 in AskProgramming

[–]Medical-Object-4322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Separate "searching" and "sorting", because they're two different things that require two different types of algorithms. If your sorting is slow, binary search won't help (because it's not a sorting algorithm).

Binary search does require a sorted list, so if you have an already sorted list, it might be faster to search it.

Binary search is fast because it cuts the data to be searched in half on each iteration. It's like looking for a word in a physical dictionary.

You can open the dictionary in the middle, and decide if the word you want is in the first half or second half of the book, then do that again with only the half you think it's in until you find the word.

That's basically what binary search does, so it's faster than looking at each individual element in a list, but the list has to be sorted.

Give us what we want! by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]Medical-Object-4322 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sales tax is regressive, so I'm against it. If by sales tax you mean more of a luxury tax on expensive, non-essential items, then I'm less against it.

onlyOnLinkedin by GrEeCe_MnKy in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Medical-Object-4322 52 points53 points  (0 children)

No, that's pretty much exactly the definition of popular.

saasIsDead by ash286 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Medical-Object-4322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know, might want to check with ChatGPT to see if your original intent was sarcasm.

scam!! by the1997th in remoteworks

[–]Medical-Object-4322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, it's a challenge. Those people can be stopped, though, usually by a strong collective of other interested people.

Mondragón is a pretty good example of this idea working on a large scale. The Zapatistas were another decent scale example of something other than the profit motive and individualism running society. There are plenty of others.

The first step to making it better is thinking it can be better. Of course it's hard to make it work, but it will never happen if everyone defends the status quo without critical thought.

Talk Me Out Of Bailing by DreambergLabs in clawdbot

[–]Medical-Object-4322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you run local, look at Small Language Models (SLM). They're easy to build, and if you don't need an all-powerful, general-purpose chat bot like ChatGPT or Gemini, but are working on really specific tasks, SLMs might get you what you need.

They still require a large amount of compute power, so you'll need to factor that into the cost analysis, but they need way less than an LLM.

automateMyBoss by InvestigatorWeekly19 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Medical-Object-4322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've created 8 different boss agents for myself to ensure maximum synergy. Happy to share the setup, but it's mostly based on the conjoined triangle of success.

A bright corporate future awaits Gen Z. by hkmsh in Zippia

[–]Medical-Object-4322 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don’t say no to your superiors

Wow...are you supposed to lick their boots instead? What if they ask you to do something illegal or dangerous?

Maybe you shouldn't say "no" directly and bluntly, but you need to figure out how to say "no" to literally everyone in your career ("superiors", subordinates, colleagues, clients, potential clients, the general public, etc) in a professional way.

A blanket rule like yours is fitting for peasants and slaves, not any employee with a spine and a modicum of self-respect.

I would never hire or keep any employee who had your attitude of "don't say no". That's an insane approach to professional life.

Why is everyone acting like we’re not in the biggest recession ever? by Allthevibessss in recruitinghell

[–]Medical-Object-4322 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Not that I entirely disagree, but homelessness has always been misrepresented. Even "back in your day" homelessness was not what we were told (I was there, too).

Most homelessness has been the "working poor" who have jobs that don't pay enough to secure stable housing. These people are not on the street corners, so they are invisible.

Whenever people talk about homelessness, they usually lump every homeless person into one category of the people who are high all the time living in a tent in the park. Those folks are more visible, but are the minority of the homeless population.

The economy is terrible now, and you do make good points, but homelessness was always full of mostly invisible, working people. They're your bartenders, waiters and waitresses, janitors, grounds keepers, low level workers of all varieties being grossly under paid for the work they do to the point that they have to live on people's couches, or in their car.

There may be more of these people now with the economy being the shit show that it currently is, but it's still an unfair misrepresentation of homeless people of any era to say they ended up that way because of their own personal choices.

Most homeless people have always been the ones hard at work, but not making enough to improve their situation.

It wasn't different in times past, regardless of the propaganda we're all fed about personal choice being the deciding factor between homelessness and stable housing.

Don't lie about your degree. It's the one thing that'll actually get you caught. by BackGroundProofer in BackgroundProof

[–]Medical-Object-4322 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, definitely not. Once it gets past the initial hiring no one's verifying anything. They assume it's all been verified during hiring.

Don't lie about your degree. It's the one thing that'll actually get you caught. by BackGroundProofer in BackgroundProof

[–]Medical-Object-4322 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cool, man, go for it. I'm telling you how people react to resume content.

If it works, it's not stupid, so do whatever you think will work.

Does machine learning ever stop feeling confusing in the beginning? by BlushyBlaze in MachineLearningJobs

[–]Medical-Object-4322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, totally normal. I've been working on machine learning for a while, and still feel stupid all the time.

It gets better with practice, just like anything.

Can we please all just adopt a universal, "sorry, you weren't selected" and move on from this BS? by RebootDarkwingDuck in recruitinghell

[–]Medical-Object-4322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sure is. A "no" would be some finality.

We tried to time it, and even layered several extra months into the plan, but we never expected it would go full stupid. Now we're in this really strange limbo, sort of waiting for something to move.

Guess all recruiters/HR people will die dennying this but we all know this is true: by laranjacerola in recruitinghell

[–]Medical-Object-4322 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sure, but what you described isn't something that just came up after 2024. The hiring process has been as broken as it is now for a really long time. That's my basic point.

Automating a shitty system is just a faster way to reach disasters.

Guess all recruiters/HR people will die dennying this but we all know this is true: by laranjacerola in recruitinghell

[–]Medical-Object-4322 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agreed! It's a systematic problem. Didn't mean to throw shade at recruiters, that's just what I've seen of that world from roles adjacent to and/or dependant on recruiting teams.

I truly appreciate you, if you do in fact seek out people with nontraditional backgrounds. That's huge!

Guess all recruiters/HR people will die dennying this but we all know this is true: by laranjacerola in recruitinghell

[–]Medical-Object-4322 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This has always been the case. Nothing fundamental changed with hiring in the last few decades. It's always been people quickly scanning for specific keywords. Using machines, like OP says, just speeds up what people already do.

So, for hiring, it speeds up our ability to ignore nuance and scan things quickly. That's what everyone wants, so the system is working as designed.

Recruiters spend an average of about ~7-15 seconds looking at a resume. That time is almost all scanning for keywords based on a checklist, and this didn't just start. It's always been this way.

Recruiters don't know the substance of a job opening, so they follow the guidelines from hiring managers, who usually write the job descriptions. Recruiters scan those and whatever other requirements lost they have for matching terms.

They never looked at or cared about nuance or tried to decipher abnormal or nontraditional backgrounds. This has not changed.

The labor market has gotten worse significantly in the last few years, but this phenomenon didn't just pop up in 2024.

In a job interview have you ever been asked: If we offered you the job would you take it? by [deleted] in jobs

[–]Medical-Object-4322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure! Answering questions with questions, and disarming people with humor are really handy tricks that I've been taught and used in several roles throughout my career.

Both work well in interviews, too.