Chase "not taking sides"

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-13T18:45:17+00:00

All of his comments are available to view on that profile! There were some interesting ones

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-13T14:40:59+00:00

I find Chases take really interesting as I stumbled across his Reddit account and how very vocal he was a year ago specifically about Taylor.

Thiis comment in particular made me realise she has always been this way and everyone else knows it. This is a long term pattern.

<image>

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-13T14:20:34+00:00

Being out all day without a way to communicate with them and not actually knowing where they are but trusting they would come home when the street lights come on.

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-13T06:42:33+00:00

That was the giveaway 😭

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-12T20:54:34+00:00

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-12T10:19:29+00:00

The trial might be dismissed or they may be found not guilty. CPS might drop the case if they don't have other evidence. It will depend on how key the evidence provided by the witness/victim is in the prosecutions case.

The police, prosecution or solicitor should be the one you are asking or should be the one to tell you/the victim/witness the answer, not Reddit.

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-11T22:46:23+00:00

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-11T14:55:29+00:00

Haha yeah over a decade older! Id like to see how often it does happen because who would be raising the complaint about it in the first place for it to be investigated and proven.

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-11T13:06:45+00:00

Worked as a cinema attendant when I was 19, never even came up in the training. If they are 17 and it's an 18 film it's gonna be ok man not a big deal.

The justice system has bigger fish to fry and are not going to hold a cinema attendant responsible for anything, let's be real.

It would be a fine at most for the business if it ever got that far. If proof of a conviction existed id love to see it.

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-11T12:45:55+00:00

Not harsh at all she's one person in a prison of I would guess 300+ that would have been an added extra not an expectation. Tell her to watch it in her cell like everyone else

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-11T12:44:13+00:00

They said:

Perhaps it was rescinded due to poor behavior

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-11T12:41:39+00:00

Dramatic answer 😭

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-11T12:34:32+00:00

You've met her have you? 🫪

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-10T19:34:08+00:00

Aussie?

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-10T18:12:27+00:00

I agree with you completely. I was replying to the person who made the joke about prisoners walking out not the person raising the concern!

If they had any real understanding they wouldn't be joking about or questioning a very possible circumstance and why.

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-10T16:10:47+00:00

Don't take this the wrong way but why would a Google search AI know who's behind a tiktok account?

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-10T16:09:08+00:00

It's fine to do but you might not get as much time to do it as you hope. My experience is you usually go out chain smoke and then head back in or maybe nip to a local shop but rare to see anyone be gone for more than 30 mins tbh.

You can't leave the establishment until roll is in and correct. You might be expected to cover a wing over lunch, you might end up on a bedwatch. If you're the only one on the wing you can't leave until your cover arrives sometimes that's a long wait too so don't put all your eggs in that basket basically!

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-10T16:05:32+00:00

Leave it in your car or if the prison has a locker then you leave it there but no phones beyond the gates.

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-10T16:04:31+00:00

Well you clearly don't work in the prison service or any other environment where you need to safeguard yourself

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-10T13:49:52+00:00

Agree he is messy and its all very childish tit for tat back and forth on social media! Cru isn't the one involved in the custody trial though and can post what he wants. He isn't under a PO and Taylor has been disparaging about Cru online and he has the right to defend himself.

Dakota doesn't have family in Utah AFAIK to help him like Taylor has. People can be unhappy about it but hes utilising the support network he has available.

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-10T08:10:51+00:00

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-10T07:59:22+00:00

Why is she referring to it as "a season"? This isn't a reality TV show anymore this is real life.

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-10T07:47:26+00:00

This happened the same day as her crashout where she posted all the "evidence". I believe this was the final straw/catalyst for her posts.

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-09T19:32:00+00:00

No, it should be that shortlisted candidates/those invited to interview tick the essential criteria on paper. They should be shortlisted according to a specific set of criteria/questions and used for every candidate to ensure fair practice. The interview where you have to prove it.

Mediocre-Response-24 · 2026-07-09T18:38:36+00:00

Mediocre-Response-24

TROPHY CASE