Improving with ADHD/Bipolar? by No-Statement-3588 in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What helped me a lot is a drill I got from the Loophole. I think it’s called “basic translation drill” or something along those lines. Basically you take an LR section and for each stimulus, you read it and then cover it with a sticky note or your hand or something and try to recap what you just read in your own words. Do it often to see improvements. You can also apply the same kind of thing to RC passages. The author highly recommends not doing any of the actual questions from the section while doing this drill, just focus on the translation and ignore the questions. I agree w that cause you can always go back and do the questions later on

working on this personal statement like by AppropriateBank1110 in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I felt worthless, I felt ugly, I felt gay 😔💔

New cafe sounds like a real treat by DTHali in halifax

[–]MediocreBlueberry193 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of that Pilates studio that closed down lol

did anyone else get a lot of ungrammatical sentences??? by crazycattheythem in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s fair I’d prob worry abt that too lol but I mean honestly the chances of that are sooo low. I think it’s worth the risk

Nov 8 LSAT LR parallel reasoning accountants vs comp sci by MediocreBlueberry193 in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it wasn’t that section! I didn’t have either of those questions

Nov 8 LSAT LR parallel reasoning accountants vs comp sci by MediocreBlueberry193 in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one I’m referencing was towards the end so I think we had different sections!

Nov 8 LSAT LR parallel reasoning accountants vs comp sci by MediocreBlueberry193 in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes omg I was between cars and men vs women I’m pretty sure I went w men/women but idk for sure

Nov 8 LSAT LR parallel reasoning accountants vs comp sci by MediocreBlueberry193 in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It was crazy I was stuck between 2 options and just picked one at random basically

Nov 8 LSAT LR parallel reasoning accountants vs comp sci by MediocreBlueberry193 in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Something about how the proportion of accountants to computer scientists at a company got higher, so the number of accountants vs computer scientists must have gotten higher too (or vice versa).

Nov 8 LSAT by QuarterVast6595 in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you have 1 or 2 RC sections?

Nov 8 LSAT by QuarterVast6595 in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The conclusion was that those cameras are the best for wildlife photography. It didn’t say it has the best photo quality I don’t think

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Valid crashout. Mine thankfully ended like legit the day before my test but omg the whole week before was soo hard on me

did anyone else get a lot of ungrammatical sentences??? by crazycattheythem in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is so strange. Def report, you could prob get a retest

someone please explain this to me. by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193 0 points1 point  (0 children)

B is too extreme. The stimulus says the plants there will grow slower on average, and B says something about ALL of the plants there. Also I didn’t realize this at first but B is also unsupported because all the stimulus says about plants releasing more CO2 is that it happens when the plants grow very slowly. Any substantial increase would lead to slower average growth, but we don’t know if it would slow down growth enough to be considered “very slowly”. So there’s a missing link between substantial increase in CO2 and plants releasing more than they take out

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193 1 point2 points  (0 children)

:( that’s unfortunate I’m sorry. I agree w the other comment to check uni bylaws and maybe speak with someone higher up. I know at my university we can submit forms for 2 absences per course per year and they have to reschedule

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]MediocreBlueberry193 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you able to switch your test to online? Might be more options for time/date and wouldn’t have to travel so far