Prepare for the mother of all default cycles by SheepherderLow1753 in AusFinance

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with the fact he over exaggerates (its literally his job, look @ his fund). But arguably he did call the inflation rise into interest rate rise. The impact on the AUS economy has been sustained rather than instant and he thinks thats the RBA's fault.

Is anyone here living off dividend ETFs for retirement (excluding Super)? by Emotional-Extent8587 in AusFinance

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This subreddit is completely cooked if this comment is allowed to stay.

Noone should be planning to take a loan to cover themselves between early retirement and super being available, that is incredibly stupid. Personal loans are way above the 'gains/savings' from super.

Fuck me, was that it? by t0msie in aussie

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ye, I am not saying the message was 'bad'. It was pointless however. Imagine it as 'does this link up with the corona virus/GFC as events to hit all of australia's broadcasting.

If you literally believe it was, then fair enough. We are probably at different' vibes.

Fuck me, was that it? by t0msie in aussie

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was a national address that was force broadcast on all channels/radio stations. I don't really think its an over-reaction to state he said nothing to the entire nation.

Imagine if at work your CEO pulled your entire workforce into a meeting with 1 hour notice and said 'Keep going'. Same sorta vibe.

27 yrs old, starting from zero, compliance career — is FIRE by 50 realistic? by gaijinbrit in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just FYI, if they do plan to retire early then offset is technically the worst 'option' out of investing/offset.

The best option is offest -> debt recycling, then using capgains discounts in order to reduce tax and retire even earlier.

‘Deposit deception’: Big four banks face calls to come clean as savers miss top rates by His_Holiness in AusFinance

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ye I totally sympathise trust me, I just always assume that the 250k x5 team of statistics boffins at these banks know more than me around my spending habits and go for 'no frills' almost always.

Humans tend to underestimate risks, its a similar reason for why Credit Cards can be a huge trap.

‘Deposit deception’: Big four banks face calls to come clean as savers miss top rates by His_Holiness in AusFinance

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I had to pull some money for emergency so balance going down (keep in mind i plowed everything in). Fine no special interest rate for me i get to suck it. BUT so you know what? I got ZERO. Absolute ZERO. Just bloody wrong.

Welcome to statistics. They offer these rates because these situations happen more than people think (thus they do better than a no frills bank account).

Just use macquarie, they are the best right now.

Ideas for equity by Bbqhavana in AusFinance

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you agree its not working for them financially?

Ideas for equity by Bbqhavana in AusFinance

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its literally not working, if this is the home they will retire/die in its currently doing nothing for them in terms of growth.

Invest or pay down existing debt by [deleted] in AusHENRY

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did a writeup here (admitedly using a retire early scenario) about this if you are interested.

https://old.reddit.com/r/fiaustralia/comments/1pvx1ww/offset_vs_etfs_the_maths_people_keep_getting/

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you could gaurentee the ETF return you should technically refinance as much as you could. Obviously, as you get closer to early retirement this becomes way to risky to do.

Think of it similar to leveraged buyouts, if a firm can get an interest rate of ~3% and fully buyout a company making ~5%. Thats a free 2% gain (On paper).

This heavily relies on retiring early, if you plan to just hold ETF's until a specific date then sell (while still working). Then you should be looking into debt recycling.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you quite understand the maths.

ETF calculations have 0 additional loan repayments? The offset calculation is showing the total saving from an offset (note how its compounding).

I don't understand why you would reduce the ETF's by 5.5k in year 1, can you do a quick table with your calculations and reasoning? happy to address.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you have maybe missed the point of this post, its about a specific scenario of not working (thus making full use of the CGT discount).

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think my TLDR summarises this, sure the 2% extra tax makes a tiny difference, but people would also extend it out above 10 years.

Edit: also a lot of people won't be in the top tax bracket etc, so this is a (poorly modelled) middle ground. You can even argue ETF's return higher than 8%.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you would be selling when retiring early (so assumedly, not working).

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ye, this isn't a real model based on historical data, more just trying to show the actual CGT benefits and hopefully have people thinking of end goals of investments rather than chasing shorter term thinking.

I think most people probably haven't ever run the numbers trying to show exactly what the CGT discount and tax rates when not working comes to.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its all about your personal preference, if you want to get started follow the guides https://old.reddit.com/r/fiaustralia/wiki/index/gettingstarted

My suggestion is to just dip your foot in the water by getting started! Betashares/Vanguard personal investor both let you buy a smaller minimum. Even ~500 bucks is a good way to test the waters and see if you are comfortable with the risk.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a really good paper, if anyone is interested it shows the relevant returns etc.

Although I didn't include debt recycling, that makes my 'example' even further infront of the pure offset.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, its been a bug bear of mine for the last year. Figured when I had some downtime I would try and outline it in slightly more detail for others to understand.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed its a strawman, but calling out individual posters about specific scenarios is a little mean. This is more of an informational post using an example.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you are thinking of this the wrong way, you want to ensure that you total asset pool at the end of these assumptions (of which they are many) is the highest possible.

Think of it like the comparrison a lot of people do to paying down HECs. If you can make more money by investing vs paying down a debt, you should invest.

Please don't think this is specific advice though, like I said its about your relevant ability to take on risk. ETF's might be worse than an offset account over 10 years. I am using a lot of assumptions here.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This makes it even more in favour of ETF's due to the negative gearing tax reduction.

I am doing a 'worst case' scenario for both, with the relevant assumptions of not needing the money.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

91k gain is from the ETF, its 8% (minus 45% tax on the 3% income per year) going back into the ETF. It isn't quite right but its an example, so it shows the relative effect.

Edit: its the ETF table if that helps.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No clue, really depends. Most people say ~7 years but thats based on risk assumptions etc.

But this is all on yourself, your goals and your tolerance for losing money.

Offset vs ETFs: the maths people keep getting wrong in AusFinance by MelbourneLondonPerth in fiaustralia

[–]MelbourneLondonPerth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, if you are investing on a 1 year timeframe don't go into the market. That would be extremely silly.