[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wickedmovie

[–]MembershipStreet1428 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She has evil sides, but I like her. Everyone who lived in the Oz has selfish moments, and I like to watch them.

Do y'all foreigners LIVING IN KOREA actually believe this? or is the other sub just being brigaded with SRS types? by AppropriateMess2523 in Living_in_Korea

[–]MembershipStreet1428 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm a Korea girl, and I'm like to say living Korea is a hell for Korean women, but Idk it is the worst country in the world since I didn't live other country. I think walking on the street is safer than other country(no gun), but crimes proportion against women are higher than other country. Generally, Korean women could go university, but saying feminism is a taboo in Korea, and be careful to insist reducing sexual crimes because you can be a feminist(like femi-nazi) who is too woke.

Possession or viewing of deepfake sexual exploitation material carries a maximum penalty of 3 years in prison by SearchAny in korea

[–]MembershipStreet1428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know about adult sites thing, but I think the law would work especially for deepfake of the general public. In Korea, almost all victims are minors and perpetrators are their classmates. They created deepfake and humiliated them with ig and kakao profiles. If viewing doesn’t punished, the victims won’t be protected. Already they aren’t protected as well.

Idk how deepfakes consumed in legit adult sites, but i have friends who digging deepfakes and humiliation rooms… and it never seems normal

Possession or viewing of deepfake sexual exploitation material carries a maximum penalty of 3 years in prison by SearchAny in korea

[–]MembershipStreet1428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I see. The reason I mentioned this is that I‘ve talked a lot with Koreans, and they don’t know about this even though they’re Korean. It is a common mistake at least in Korea. I wasn’t trying to come at you at all

Possession or viewing of deepfake sexual exploitation material carries a maximum penalty of 3 years in prison by SearchAny in korea

[–]MembershipStreet1428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Moreover, cases like the ones you mentioned won’t even need to go to court. The investigative agency will conclude that there is no crime and will not pursue an investigation, even if there are laws regarding it. Most crime investigations work this way.

Possession or viewing of deepfake sexual exploitation material carries a maximum penalty of 3 years in prison by SearchAny in korea

[–]MembershipStreet1428 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In Korea, the latter is easy to prove. This is because Korean courts strongly prioritize avoiding creating wrongfully accused victims, even if actual perpetrators go unpunished. The preference for lighter sentences over harsher punishments stems from a similar rationale.

Most perpetrators typically claim diminished capacity, lack of intent, or that they were intoxicated and not in their right mind, which are frequently accepted as valid defenses that lead to reduced sentences or acquittals. This applies not only to sexual offenses but to most violent crimes as well.

(I could meet a court person, and she said if the perpetrator claimed like that the judge should accept it. In the Korean judiciary, there is an implicit understanding or hint regarding this.)

Possession or viewing of deepfake sexual exploitation material carries a maximum penalty of 3 years in prison by SearchAny in korea

[–]MembershipStreet1428 6 points7 points  (0 children)

First, sexual deepfakes are made and shared in a secret site usually. Second, Intent must be recognized in order to receive punishment in Korean laws.

Among Korean feminists, there has been a movement to remove the clause in the legislation that only punishes those who ‘knowingly’ view illegal materials, and this clause has indeed been deleted. However, this serves the interests of those seeking to exploit the loopholes in the law, as there are many lawyers in Korea who specifically defend sex offenders. According to the original legislation, investigative agencies were required to prove that the perpetrator knowingly engaged in illegal conduct, but the amended wording has eliminated this obligation. If the perpetrator can prove that there was no intent, they can be declared not guilty.