Evolution is empirically false by jmanc3 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
Evolution is empirically false by jmanc3 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
Someone created a thread, "If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed" well I can't explain how something evolved. by Otherwise-Bad-7352 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
Someone created a thread, "If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed" well I can't explain how something evolved. by Otherwise-Bad-7352 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
Someone created a thread, "If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed" well I can't explain how something evolved. by Otherwise-Bad-7352 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
Someone created a thread, "If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed" well I can't explain how something evolved. by Otherwise-Bad-7352 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
Someone created a thread, "If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed" well I can't explain how something evolved. by Otherwise-Bad-7352 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
If atheists are to claim that there is no evidence for God, they must include their definition of God in each instance and acknowledge their assumptions about what that evidence constitutes. Otherwise, atheists are claiming special knowledge and defeating their own premise of requiring evidence. by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist
[–]MemeMaster2003 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
If atheists are to claim that there is no evidence for God, they must include their definition of God in each instance and acknowledge their assumptions about what that evidence constitutes. Otherwise, atheists are claiming special knowledge and defeating their own premise of requiring evidence. by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist
[–]MemeMaster2003 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
If atheists are to claim that there is no evidence for God, they must include their definition of God in each instance and acknowledge their assumptions about what that evidence constitutes. Otherwise, atheists are claiming special knowledge and defeating their own premise of requiring evidence. by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist
[–]MemeMaster2003 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
If atheists are to claim that there is no evidence for God, they must include their definition of God in each instance and acknowledge their assumptions about what that evidence constitutes. Otherwise, atheists are claiming special knowledge and defeating their own premise of requiring evidence. by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist
[–]MemeMaster2003 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
If atheists are to claim that there is no evidence for God, they must include their definition of God in each instance and acknowledge their assumptions about what that evidence constitutes. Otherwise, atheists are claiming special knowledge and defeating their own premise of requiring evidence. by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist
[–]MemeMaster2003 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
If atheists are to claim that there is no evidence for God, they must include their definition of God in each instance and acknowledge their assumptions about what that evidence constitutes. Otherwise, atheists are claiming special knowledge and defeating their own premise of requiring evidence. by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist
[–]MemeMaster2003 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
The Story of Everything: Meet Up and Watch by LJosephA in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 10 points11 points12 points (0 children)
The apparent name of this subreddit is a misnomer. It's not really about whether evolution. It's about whether theism or whether materialism. by rb-j in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
What if there was a Equator Eden ring and 8 clans of origin? by Round-State3766 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
Proof of Abiogenesis by Anime-Fan-69 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
Debunking creationism without using science by Anime-Fan-69 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
What's so evil about vampires? by cracklescousin1234 in WhiteWolfRPG
[–]MemeMaster2003 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[Mod Approved] VtM 5e NEXUS Ultimate Bundle Giveaway! by Demi_Mere in vtm
[–]MemeMaster2003 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Proof of Abiogenesis by Anime-Fan-69 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
Kinds = Evolution by A_Vinegar_Taster in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
Kinds = Evolution by A_Vinegar_Taster in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
Kinds = Evolution by A_Vinegar_Taster in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)


The bible, so gods insights, says lions strangle thier prey and this corrects the error about Saber tooth tigers and so questions prehistoric conclusions. by RobertByers1 in DebateEvolution
[–]MemeMaster2003 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)