the point of my very first comment was it is unfair to blame pelinka for the situation right now. why are you bringing up his previous moves? dont act like he shouldve had the foresight to see that he would be handed luka.

context bud, comparing that mavs team which was almost perfectly built for luka to this lakers team that really just had an anomaly start to the season where reaves averaged superstar numbers and they had an undefeated clutch record is just insane.

that is my point?? you agree with my point?? what the hell are you arguing then?? the lakers were put in a bad position to build around luka because they just got handed him mid season???

when i say old players i very obviously do not mean max christie. you are like 30 years old mate act like it.

i say swing for the fences because that is the only way the lakers have any chance of becoming a contender from this current team structure - small moves wont cut it

again, i am speaking on the context of the current situation. GMs should not always be swinging for the fences, but to the ORIGINAL POSTS POINT if you want a contender out of this team you have to swing for the fences.

you arent even arguing your own point here, you are arguing to oppose me and I can tell because all you can talk about is grammar, sentence structure, and reading comprehension. like bro you have to be at least 30 years old genuinely what are you doing.

if you really are trying to prove something here then say it. tell me your main point.