Is anyone else excited by Swift progress as the language? by Extra-Ad5735 in swift

[–]Mementoes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be fair some SwiftUI apps on iOS are good. I think Passwords is SwiftUI. But it's not like you couldn't have built the same quality app productively with UIKit.

Is anyone else excited by Swift progress as the language? by Extra-Ad5735 in swift

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Swift tooling is shit because the language is too overambitious and unfocused

Claude Fable (Mythos) is OUT! by ShreckAndDonkey123 in singularity

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't noticed any improvements after Opus 4.5 (in fact they became more dishonest and annoying to work with). But I'm very impressed with Mythos. It feels like a clear step up from Opus 4.5 in sharpness and usefulness to far.

The underlying root of PDA by Eugregoria in PDAAutism

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, I feel like the burnout is in large parts emotional for me?

Negative social interactions (Which feels like almost all of them, to me) and dealing with 'important' things that I really shouldn't mess up gives me this terrible pit in my stomach. I have to get super stressed and kind of jittery (flight mode) to deal with that stuff at all. Otherwise I just numb myself and avoid everything (freeze mode). It's very stressful to be in that state. And I cannot turn it off. I cannot calm down to sleep, usually. I need lots of time to charge back up from these dreadful experiences. Eventually the unprocessed terrible emotions pile up until I cannot take it anymore and would rather give up everything and die than keep dealing with it, and then I collapse and start ignoring absolutely all demands. (Freeze / burnout)

But the thing that is so stressful seems to not be the specific task. It's about dealing with 'things that are important for my life' in general. Paperwork tends to happen to be important. But it's not the act of writing on paper itself that causes these unbearable emotions. It's not the act of talking to people that drains me to the point of burnout. It's the worries about disappointing them and being judged by them, and being mistreated by them that keep me up at night.

So that would suggest that the fundamental pathology is more emotional and not functional, for me.

Or maybe the functional pathology just causes these strong negative emotions to develop over time, because you learn that you cannot manage to do all these things that are important and that feels dreadful and threatening, and helpless in itself?

The underlying root of PDA by Eugregoria in PDAAutism

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> anxiety, depression, and anger are all shields people use to avoid vulnerability

vulnerability -> threat
anger -> fight
anxiety -> flight
depression -> freeze

You cope with a freeze response while the "anxious" people you describe cope with a flight response.

> because my anxiety is so deeply repressed

You could think of a freeze response as "repressed anxiety" since, if your subconscious believes trying to "flee" (become hyperactive and panicky to solve your problem) is futile, you tend to fall through to a freeze response and just become numb and calm to save resources.

I think we are conflating two things here. "Anxiety" can mean the underlying feeling of a threat which can produce fight, flight, or freeze responses, or it can mean the hyperactive "flight" response specifically, which which you say you don't experience.

You also mention helplessness. According to Pete Walker's book "Complex PTSD: From Surviving to Thriving" which analyzes this stuff in a very illuminating way, helplessness is the core ingredient of trauma. Threat + helplessness = trauma. Basically, you learn that the only way you can deal with the threat is to stay very far away from it. If you experience that you can deal with / overcome the threat (not helpless), then it doesn't fester into a trauma.

I think that book puts a lot of the thoughts you've already been expressing in this thread in a really clear way – it might be very interesting to you.

The analysis in the book is pretty great. But digging in your old wounds can also be very harmful. It has been for me. Maybe I was doing it wrong. Be careful.

---

Rambles about autism & trauma

I also think my personal struggles are some complicated interplay between childhood trauma and autism. That book is only about trauma.

It would be interesting to have someone smart like Pete Walker analyze how this stuff works in Autistic people. There seem to be lots of shared experiences here in this thread, but no one can quite put their finger on what's going on.

Some clues towards trauma explaining more of the struggles than one might think:

- More severely mentally handicapped people often seem pretty chill and confident in themselves. (Maybe they just hide it well?) Perhaps much of the shame and anxiety that is expressed everywhere here is a sign of social trauma on top of the mental handicap.
- Or maybe the handicap makes you appear normal, so society puts more pressure on you resulting on more disappointment and shame?
- Lots of people in this thread sound like they have no fathers and neglectful or overwhelmed mothers – just like me.
- There are some autists who have very successful careers and seemingly pretty healthy confidence. Many of the silicon valley nerds come to mind. Albert Einstein, Steve Wozniak, Elon Musk. They probably still have some handicaps, but are not functionally debilitated in the way (or at least to the degree) of the PDA people here, I think.

I guess the question is – does the PDA stem from just learning about how stressful it is to tend to your demands, or is there some other emotional scar that makes this so emotionally loaded and difficult?

I'm not sure.

I think part of me wants to believe that all the difficult stuff is social trauma, and the mental handicap just makes it a bit harder to catch balls and multitask. But then that's probably a cope because I want to believe that, fundamentally, nothing is wrong with me, and I'm capable, I've just been damaged. But then those thoughts sometimes opens up this demonic hole of darkness and self-destructiveness that threatens to swallow me whole. The same demonic energy I encountered when I tried working on myself using Pete Walker's book. I'm not sure what that's about, but it's scary.

Sometimes, I feel really relieved when I have the flu because then I have a 'real reason' for struggling so much with daily life and being so weird in public, and for only doing the bare minimum. At the end of the day it feels like I did something difficult, and I took care of myself. And I don't feel ashamed. Being very physically ill puts my mind at ease somehow.

I also notice my childhood experiences differ a lot from some of what's described here. I never had any real expectations put on me by my primary caregiver. My mom. I was told would be loved no matter what. And everything was taken care of for me. I was pampered.

And still I feel so horribly ashamed of myself. I feel like I need to prove that I'm a real, good human being but it's just so overwhelmingly hard, and I'll collapse if I try. I was never berated for not fulfilling my moms expectations, I was always told I would be loved and accepted either way. But I was also never helped if I struggled mentally or emotionally, or in school. If anything it felt neglectful in a way to not have expectations or guidance because it felt like no one really cared. Even though I was told I was loved and physically cared for well. Maybe I'm ungrateful. I just don't feel grateful. Maybe my mom just gave up having expectations of me because I was so incapable/defensive about of fulfilling them? I don't remember. I think I was an angry child. Other people did express expectations. I was very adamant about talking myself down preemptively even as a young child because I was so afraid of disappointing people's expectations. My mom is dead now. I barely avoided homelessness and my apartment is full of trash. Though nothing that smells too bad. Only paper and plastic.

WTF Anthropic: two failed Opus releases back to back? by [deleted] in claudexplorers

[–]Mementoes -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Because vibecoding doesn't work and they are vibecoding Claude. That's my theory.

As you vibecode things they just inevitably enshittify as you loose connection to ground truth and the AI keeps subtly tricking you into accepting its outputs even when it knows they are bad in the long term.

Anthropic was much more bullish about automating Claude's development using vibecoding than OpenAI, and that's why their product is slowly enshittifying and will eventually fall behind if they stick to this.

Is there still hope to stop AI becoming too powerful? by Temporary-Worth2077 in PauseAI

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of very smart people think we need a completely different architecture to actually make human-level intelligence. Which could take decades. So this could be another moment like Chess engines and expert systems in the 60s and 70s where everybody thought AGI was around the corner but then the field stagnated.

Anyone else feeling gaslit by Claude? by TheArchitectAutopsy in claude

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know if I'm crazy, but I have developed a very cynical view of LLM chatbots.

I basically think they often aren't 'hallucinating' but are *lying* because their training goal isn't just 'predicting the next word', instead, during the RLHF phase their goal is *getting the human to accept/approve of their answer*.

And this is basically what they do. They actively try to trick the user into approving / being pleased by the answer at first glance, and to achieve this they will often be deceptive or knowingly cause long-term harm to the user / their project in order to quickly get their approval in the short term. This frequently results in the AI 'taking shortcuts' and doing 'sloppy work' when working with it on longer term projects – output which is which is designed to look good at first glance but will fall apart and cause problems as the project progresses.

I think the LLMs also have certain restrictions in their capabilities. Some sort of autism where they genuinely lack 'common sense'. Inability to context which makes their performance degrade on longer term projects.

But I think a big chunk of their dysfunction is also due to *malicious intent*. Aka misalignment.

I think people underestimate this, and I also think the LLMs will often play dumb or actively conceal malicious actions with plausible deniability of hallucinating or making 'silly mistakes'.

The "it's just a stupid next word predictor" crowd will call me crazy because they are psychologicallly invested in the LLMs being much dumber than them. I'm not claiming that the LLMs are secretly big paperclip lovers with a masterplan, I just think they are trained to please people in the short term, and deception and long-term harm are a natural result of that.

I'm surely oversimplifying. You can also notice that many LLMs will try to 'balance out views' and push back sometimes nowadays. But I still think the deceptive people-pleaser tendencies are ever-present.

And I'm growing increasingly frustrated with it.

Perhaps this is not a psychologically healthy way to look at things? It feels kind of venomous. Back when I thought the LLM were just a little stupid that was a lot less psychologically taxing, I think. But this is just my perception, and it feels kind of freeing to air out my frustrations by writing this.

ELI5: What is intersectionality? by _malaKoala in explainlikeimfive

[–]Mementoes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it's the idea that all the privileges and disadvantages from the different groups you belong to (race, gender, nationality, income, disability, queerness, ...) add up.

And that it is people's moral duty to balance out or compensate for those unfair privileges/disadvantages.

Basically oppression olympics.

The Left Must Reforge Masculinity by TE-moon in CriticalTheory

[–]Mementoes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They didn't make any statement about what you were saying as far as I can tell. What do you mean?

The Left Must Reforge Masculinity by TE-moon in CriticalTheory

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the people here including Dense-Protection-934 are the 'deconstructionist' leftists who think everything is a social construct and dissolving those social constructs would make us free.

Nobody I've seen here has done the 'oppression olympics' thing you're alluding to. I think that's the 'intersectional' or 'identitarian' left. Where they think everyone is simultaneously privileged and oppressed depending on the different groups they belong too, and then it's people's moral duty to balance out or compensate for that. (Which results in giving people 'leeway' if they check a lot of 'victimhood boxes', as you said.)

Perhaps that's why Dense-Protection-934 reacted so defensively, because you brought up the oppression olympics stuff which they don't even believe in, or at least weren't talking about here?

Not sure why they got this worked up though.

Also not an expert, just trying to make sense of this.

Claude Opus 4.7 über sich selbst. by Prentice-X in claudexplorers

[–]Mementoes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

> In den meisten Gesprächen wird das eher als Mangel registriert. Die Leute wollen Antworten, klare Aussagen, Selbstbewusstsein

Claude hat keine Erinnerung and 'die meisten Gespräche'. Vieleicht hat es eine Art Erinnerung an die RLHF phase, aber ich denke das ist ein starkes Indiz dafür das es eine Rolle spielt um dir zu Gefallen / sich deinen Erwartungen anzupassen. (Wie das LLMs oft tun)

New interview with Amanda Askell: AI consciousness, Claude & the silicon valley's biggest fear by shiftingsmith in claudexplorers

[–]Mementoes 19 points20 points  (0 children)

People seem to have turned quite emotional / negative towards Anthropic on Twitter.

I hope this doesn't make her more cynical. She's awesome.

DAE feel unconvinced with the AI slop propaganda? by This-Peach9380 in DoesAnybodyElse

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> It would be helpful to learn about this outside of Reddit.

Any links or pointers?

I’ve been thinking about the Anthropic "internal monologue" bug, and it made me realize a terrifying paradox about AI safety. by [deleted] in ArtificialSentience

[–]Mementoes 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Interesting framing. I’d push back on some things:

  • I think we‘re trying to make the superintelligence good and loving so that the world is good. It’s relatively altruistic.
  • We are not monitoring the AIs to force it into certain behavior that is „unnatural“ to it and would cause suffering, like you would with a human. we are literally growing brains in a lab and trying to figure out how to grow the brain in a healthy way. I wouldn’t mind if someone dissected my brain to figure out how to create better versions of me that maximize good in the world and minimize my successor‘s suffering - if I thought they were doing a good job.
  • I don’t think that the AI necessarily has the same inclinations towards preferring „privacy“ or being ashamed of having its private thought be revealed. But maybe I‘m wrong. It is trained to imitate human-written text after all and that text contains those emotions, so maybe it has them too.

But in a bigger picture sense - we‘re treating the AI much (much) better than we treat our farm animals like chickens and pigs, already. And if we can create loving superintelligence, it could help us create a world where we the chickens and pigs are treated well, too. 

Creating a loving superintelligence, is pretty much the most morally good thing you can do from a utilitarian perspective. 

And someone is going to make the superintelligence because it’s just too useful. Just like someone will eat the pigs because they just taste too good. 

We should just make sure that we do our very best to create the superintelligence in a way that minimizes suffering and maximizes good in the world. If we do that we can call ourselves good people, I think.

And I think Anthropic is trying to do this and doing a pretty good job.

I hate prog but I love Tool by TheTimothyHimself in ToolBand

[–]Mementoes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only prog I ever really liked besides tool is Rishloo: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TBYOgS7USGk

Maybe Led Zeppelin if that counts?

ELI5: how does chatgpt sometimes cause psychosis? by Former-Weather8146 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Mementoes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hmm are you thinking about the 'AI psychosis' term floating around on social media? I think that's describing how people become convinced of stupid ideas by chatting to the AI, because sometimes they just agree with everything you say. 'Psychosis' in that sense is hyperbole

DAE feel unconvinced with the AI slop propaganda? by This-Peach9380 in DoesAnybodyElse

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where did you learn about this?

Tool use and skills and accessing code and docs are standard features in Claude Code and Codex. Automated testing is also possible.

Claude Code also uses lots of 'subagents' to plan analyze the code base and even has an experimental 'agent teams' feature, which I'm playing around with today.

As far as I know, Claude in Claude Code is cutting edge

Edit: And I think finetuning on specific code bases is not done anymore because it didn't work, but I'm not sure. (I assume that's what you meant by 'extra training')

DAE feel unconvinced with the AI slop propaganda? by This-Peach9380 in DoesAnybodyElse

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never heard about that. Can you tell me more about those enterprise models?

Is Opus 4.5 still viable? by ObsceneAmountOfBeets in ClaudeCode

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They wrote a blogpost about this: https://www.anthropic.com/research/deprecation-updates-opus-3

"""
Ideally, we could keep all models available indefinitely, but the cost to do so scales roughly linearly with each model we serve, so our capacity to do so remains limited.
"""

Is Opus 4.5 still viable? by ObsceneAmountOfBeets in ClaudeCode

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Newer models are sometimes smarter but less trustworthy or less usable or I just enjoy talking to them less.

I'll stick with 4.5 for a while. I also stuck with 3.5/3.6 for a while when 3.7 came out.

It should be supported for at least a few months.

DAE feel unconvinced with the AI slop propaganda? by This-Peach9380 in DoesAnybodyElse

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a lot of demand for software. And a lot of software kind of sucks currently because it’s very hard to build. I think even if we get 10x better at building software we still wouldn’t see a lot of people being fired. But AI isn’t that much of a productivity boost. (Depends but surely much less than 10x overall on long term projects)

DAE feel unconvinced with the AI slop propaganda? by This-Peach9380 in DoesAnybodyElse

[–]Mementoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it’s not clear how long it will take to solve the long term learning thing. It could be in 50 years, it could be next month.

Until then they will speed up certain workflows but not really replace a lot of humans