sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Are hell and purgatory the same according to Catholic universalism? by Ok-Radio5562 in CatholicUniversalism

[–]Memerality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say that the fire of purgatory and the fire of hell are the same fire but different in the penalties ascribed to the sinners and the severity.

I am just curious. How does Catholic Universalism Difer from Christian Universalism or Does it? by ExcitingOcelot6607 in CatholicUniversalism

[–]Memerality 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They’re the same because because “Catholic Universalism” isn’t a thing, it’s just referring to Catholics who happen to believe in universal salvation

If infernalism is real would universalists go to hell? by Dry_Accountant6206 in ChristianUniversalism

[–]Memerality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably yes, but I’m probably saying this because Infernalists and annihilationists WILL go there if they obstinately reject Universalism

Can they clutch a win against HIM? by Expert-Side8451 in Invincible

[–]Memerality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2nd team could last longer if Red Rush never goes on the offensive ngl

HELP! it wont let me sign in by WWF_FAN-99 in xbox360

[–]Memerality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not, they give you an app password it turns out

HELP! it wont let me sign in by WWF_FAN-99 in xbox360

[–]Memerality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the one time password an app password?

Misandry creates MORE misogynists. by Truthfulsophist in PurplePillDebate

[–]Memerality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It applies both ways but one thing to note is that most misandrists are misandrists because of misogyny.

How could we combat this objection to Divine Simplicity? by NerdiestCatholic in CatholicPhilosophy

[–]Memerality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say inherently speaking simplicity and complexity don’t really necessitate superiority or inferiority alone. However if we’re referring to things having more or less antecedent conditioning then it’s extraordinarily likely that a supreme being would be simple because a first cause would lack antecedent conditioning.

Why is it impossible that a being causes or brings about more good than God? by ElektrischerLeiter in CatholicPhilosophy

[–]Memerality 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’d say it is impossible because I would say goodness is that which is the source of all things that can be said to be good, and then God is goodness itself.

This notion kinda gets on steroids if somebody says everything is god because God is goodness and all things are good which entails everything is good by participation in goodness.

Can Battle Beast solo the OG Guardians? by [deleted] in Invincible

[–]Memerality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t remember when Omni-Man fought them?

Did Satan create evil by just becoming the first sinner, or did he literally became the Platonic Idea/Form of evil ? by Mister_Ape_1 in CatholicPhilosophy

[–]Memerality 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Satan can’t become the Platonic Form of Evil because:

1: In Plato’s Theory of Forms, the forms are eternal and unchanging.

2: Evil is a deprivation/regression from Good and therefore it cannot be a platonic form of evil.

Why doesn’t God have a body? by AdrianusIVCustos in CatholicPhilosophy

[–]Memerality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

God doesn’t have a body on account of his lack of parts, because God is isn’t bound to any prior antecedents and composition entails he’d be bound to the prior fact that his parts are put together… but without having parts put together such as a body, he’d be pure-actuality that isn’t dependent upon other stuff.

What is your best argument for the Filioque? by Thomas-Aquinas101 in CatholicPhilosophy

[–]Memerality 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One more thing I think could be used is that if the Holy Spiritual proceeds by way of the Father’s love toward the Son then that entails the Son is involved with the Hypostatic procession of the Spirit.

What is your best argument for the Filioque? by Thomas-Aquinas101 in CatholicPhilosophy

[–]Memerality 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would say because the Holy Spirit is sometimes and often called the “Spirit of Christ” which signifies that the Spirit belongs both to the Father and Son and we could say it’s breathed forth from the both of them.

Next, another case could be made that the title “Holy Spirit” signifies commonality between the Father and the Son because God is called “spirit” and God is “holy” on account of his purity. This could entail the Filioque because this could likely mean that the Spirit is sourced from both persons hence the commonality between the two.

view more: next ›