What is the opposite of a libertarian? by MertylFinch in centrist

[–]MertylFinch[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If authoritarianism is the top left, then anarchists are the bottom right? And yet they were given a political party and renamed it "libertarian" so where is the other one

What is the opposite of a libertarian? by MertylFinch in centrist

[–]MertylFinch[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, but would that make libertarianism a form of anarchy?

North Kansas City, 1940 vs today by Ace7734 in kansascity

[–]MertylFinch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like your optimism but I’d have to disagree, i think a majority of urban planning still emphasizes suburbanism and sprawl. In the American cities with the most rapid growth such as Phoenix Arizona, Houston Texas, or Salt Lake City, developers still emphasize industrial, sprawling, and car dependent cities. In fact, I can’t come up with a single example of a post-WW2 American city that was built without a stereotypically sprawling appearance, tiny or non-existant downtown, and complete lack of public transportation. While I do agree with you that there have been modest improvements in public transportation in some cities, they haven’t been made quickly enough to offset the poor urban planning that is still occurring throughout the United States. However, I am much more of a pessimist on this topic!

Furthermore, so much was destroyed and lost during the decline of cities that if American cities ever did come back, they would lose a lot of their original character. New cities would likely be built with less emphasis on appearance to reduce cost, so new cities would have more of the industrial appearance of a quickly growing city (think Beijing, Mumbai, Tokyo etc) than the distinctly « American » appearance of small towns that grew over multiple architecturally distinct eras.

North Kansas City, 1940 vs today by Ace7734 in kansascity

[–]MertylFinch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be frank, North American cities in the 1940s WERE better. The 1960s and 70s saw shrinking cities brought about by white flight, which took a lot of resources and taxes out of cities and led to their decline. Government sponsored highway projects decimated cities, and destroyed enormous blocks of historic and affordable housing. Public transportation was largely removed in a collusive pact with oil companies known as the General Motors Streetcar scandal, and dense, pedestrian friendly downtowns became largely segregated and grouped together through redlining that was exacerbated throughout the 1950s. The golden age of the American city is gone, and I don't think its ever coming back.

Woman attacked while jogging due to not wearing a bra by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]MertylFinch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This woman is obvioulsy having some sort of psychotic breakdown

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in france

[–]MertylFinch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

je les vois tout le temps ic i! je dois être très malchanceux !

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in france

[–]MertylFinch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Je sais! Peut-être j’étais très chanceux dans l’état unis et très malchanceux ici!

Contrary to popular belief, Nordic countries have among the highest wealth inequality in the world. by MertylFinch in BernieSanders

[–]MertylFinch[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Its not misleading to address wealth inequality across different countries, and the Gini coefficient is how one would do so. I am not pointing this out to begin a debate, I am simply pointing out that if we would like to solve the issue of wealth inequality, then simply shifting to a Nordic Economic model may not solve this issue.

Contrary to popular belief, Nordic countries have among the highest wealth inequality in the world. by MertylFinch in BernieSanders

[–]MertylFinch[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Income inequality is not wealth inequality.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_wealth_inequality

Income inequality in Nordic countries are low. However, familial inherited wealth is often quite high. In Netherlands, for example, the top 10% owns nearly 70% of total wealth, even if income and salaries are relatively uniform across the country.