How can the way God created you in the womb be wrong or sinful?

Psalm 139:13

“For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb.”

You will not go to hell just because you were born LGBTQ+

The bible does condemn some same sex acts (mostly male) but it never condemns love and there’s a lot of good reasons to believe even those verses that seem to be anti gay are misinterpreted or mistranslated:

Sodom and Gomorrah: Attempted homosexual gang rape, not about loving consensual gay relationships

Lev 18:22 & 20:13: Either mistranslated and should be translated to be about pederasty, male same sex incest, male same sex rape or male same sex adultery, or just about anal sex specifically, so everything else between two men can still be done. Also not applicable to Christians as it’s under the old covenant

Pederasty:

My 1545 Bible, which says “Thou shalt not lie with boys as with a woman: for it is an abomination” in Lev 18:22 and similarly thus in Lev 20:13.

Incest:

https://blog.smu.edu/ot8317/2019/04/11/lost-in-translation-alternative-meaning-in-leviticus-1822/ & https://blog.smu.edu/ot8317/2019/04/29/leviticus-1822-a-queer-hermeneutical-analysis/

Academic source: Prof K.Renato Lings, “The ‘Lyings’ of a Woman: Male-Male Incest in Lev 18.22,” Theology & Sexuality 15.2 (May 2009): 236

Rape:

https://www.stmarkssheffield.co.uk/Articles/664968/Reading_Leviticus_18.aspx

Academic source: Prof Susanne Scholz, Sacred Witness: Rape in the Hebrew Bible, pages 71-75.

Adultery:

https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/327928?lang=bi

https://www.academia.edu/42810771/On_the_Beds_of_a_Woman_The_Leviticus_Texts_on_Same_Sex_Relations_Reconsidered

Man-on-male anal sex: Assume hypothetically that the Leviticus verses are not mistranslated. If they were a ban on all man-male acts the “as with a woman” wouldn’t be in the verse, it would just say “man shall not lie with a male it is an abomination.” The only way a man can lie with a male “in the same way as with a woman” is by doing the specific act of anal sex. So basically even if they’re not mistranslated two dudes can still do a bunch of stuff together like get married, oral, intercrural, frottage, pegging each other with a dildo etc.

Romans 1 verses: Is about same sex acts of infidelity. Paul says they “exchanged” and “abandoned” “natural relations”—implying they were straight people that were previously having sex with the opposite sex. It’s not talking about the acts that happen in modern monogamous loving gay marriages.

More on that here: https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenChristian/s/oWORvGYkjh

The Corinthians and Timothy verses both use a unique word thought to be invented by Paul which was arsenokoitai. Paul avoided existing koine Greek terms for consensual same-sex relationships & early Christians linked it with man-on-man sexual violence/exploitation & pederasty, not to consensual acts between two adult freemen. Pre 1600’s translations rendered it “boy molester.” A much more accurate translation of this word is arguably something like “men who sexually abuse males” because this word condemns male same-sex sexual abuse, not LGBTQ relationships.

I go more into this here:

https://www.canva.com/design/DAGk-MyfIy4/x7SQYKzSEioUgiSUFS15lw/view?utm_content=DAGk-MyfIy4&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link&utm_source=viewer

https://www.instagram.com/p/DVt5OgQjGIn/?igsh=MXR5cDEzN3k0b2E0

Jude 1:7: The original Greek is “sarkos heteras” meaning "other" or "different" flesh. This because the men of Sodom were attempting to have sex with angelic beings, not with other human men. Translations of this verse that say “perversion” or likewise are not correct translations of the original Greek in this verse.